24-02-2017, 07:18 PM
Even though Sandy Larsen is the one who proved the plaid pattern on Lovelady's shirt matches the one on the man walking down the Elm St extension, he is now over on the Education Forum arguing that Lovelady is still on the steps. This is bizarre and what I call the "Murphy Effect" because while Larsen is arguing against his own evidence, no one points it out. Not even his opposition Bill Miller. There is no processing of evidence now in the community and useless petty parsing is preferred over evidence. Even those who proved evidence are not held accountable to its necessary conclusions and are allowed to argue against their own findings with no one pointing it out.
The reason the plaid bars line up is because the man is Lovelady. The Murphy effect is apparently capable of curing baldness...
The reason the plaid bars line up is because the man is Lovelady. The Murphy effect is apparently capable of curing baldness...