06-03-2017, 07:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-03-2017, 08:10 PM by Albert Doyle.)
The Assassination community has become a swamp of hijacking where it is impossible to have an objective conversation about evidence. Bob, who refuses to answer the basic question about Larsen lining-up the plaid bars in Lovelady's shirt with those on the man walking down the Elm St Extension is now back with an attitude chiding me for not providing reference. This is the giant double standard playing field created by the pro-Murphy posters where they don't have to answer basic evidence and I am always at fault no matter how good my evidence is. Bob doesn't have to answer obvious evidence that establishes the two men walking down the Elm St Extension are most definitely Lovelady and Shelley while I have to live up to his research standards on demand.
When Bob went over to the ROKC forum and verified from fantasy theory guru Greg Parker that indeed Buell Frazier had said directly that Shelley was memorably slightly taller than Lovelady, Bob's reaction to this iron-clad confirmation shows his true stripes as a Murphy-ite. He attacks Buell Frazier - a person who knew Shelley and direct witness who was there - and says he isn't credible, even though the quote is innocent and not formed in relation to any Elm St Extension questions. Bob's reaction to evidence he doesn't want to hear is a good example of the dishonest dynamic by which this Murphy nonsense has been promulgated. His obvious denial will have no penalty or remonstration from the community and he might even be in line for a Lancer Excellence In Research award for his contemptuous denial of the facts. Here we are forced to once again endure an everything-but-the-truth analysis used to counter this unwelcome information delivered with utmost sincerity and righteous indignation by Bob. The one thing we can't allow is that this lock stock and barrel confirmation proves that Lovelady and Shelley are the two men walking down the Elm St Extension, and we don't need further years-worth of pro-Murphy bullshit on it.
Thomas Graves is nothing but an irritating troll who has free reign to violate all the dishonest restrictions Gordon placed on me when I was cleaning the clocks of his favored pro-Murphy posters. While pretending he was enforcing strict academic rules instead of just protecting his friends who were losing, James Gordon has since allowed the Education Forum to degenerate in to a chat room like atmosphere where any kind of idiotic comment is OK as long as it comes from his favored posters. The only rule over there is who accepts the pro-Murphy corrupted moderation and who doesn't. The Education Forum will never be credible as long as he is in charge. It is obvious to me that the room is UK-biased and that since ROKC is UK-based they have free reign with the British crook Gordon. - Knowing that Davidson verified Prayer Woman in Wiegman Graves has pulled the obnoxious move of showing a graphic from Davidson that puts a camera in Prayer Man's hands and shows him as Oswald. Graves, who gets away with deliberate deceit from the wit-less non-moderator Gordon, is doing this because, in his usual trouble-making way, he is trying to stir up conflict in order to get around answering for Davidson's most pertinent evidence - the woman's face that is backed by his metadata. No one points out to Graves that the Oswald with camera image Davidson fabricated shows Oswald lifting the viewfinder to his eye. No one points out to these pro-Murphy trouble-makers that they were saying the glowing hand was the Imperial Reflex top viewfinder reflecting through the lens and that they are directly contradicting their own claims while pretending not to notice.
For credible analyzers, we have already proven the glowing object is Sarah Stanton's hand, as indicated by the rounded knuckles and slits between the fingers seen on this object at best resolution. Of course, the everything-except-what-it-is approach of the pro-Murphy posters automatically disallows this proof as its main objective, but the first credible photo analyzer will confirm it as soon as they get a hold of the originals. Sarah is holding her purse in both hands while her right hand glows in sun. Andrej Stancak is a would be expert pretending to be a skilled analyzer. He gets praised by Larry Hancock who doesn't answer for his failures and Gordon, having no skill himself, uses their opinion as guidance, ignoring all the proof and censoring in favor of the people who have just been out-argued while claiming a sensitivity to content. When I pointed out that Stancak did not put a cartoon graphic for Prayer Man in to his overlay image because he realized it didn't fit the dishonest pro-Murphy posters ignored it. No one asked Stancak on the Education Forum why he didn't place a cartoon graphic for Prayer Man in the overlay image? The obvious answer is he did and when he did he realized it didn't fit and therefore proved what I was saying. Gordon knew Stancak was in deep trouble so he solved the problem by banning me without explanation.
Sorry Bob but you can't call for evidence and then ignore it when it shows up. Buell Frazier was a person who knew Shelley directly and clearly said Shelley appeared slightly taller than Lovelady. It is time for you to stop filling these boards with dishonest doubt designed to bolster the now-refuted Prayer Man theory and accept the evidence. Be honest and admit that the only reason you were pursuing these peripheral cases of Depository evidence was to loosen the witnessing in order to fit Murphy in. Ray Mitcham's denial of Frazier's comment is a perfect example of the intentional dishonesty I am talking about. Mitcham is a world class fool whose lack of skill prevents him from realizing the buttons on Prayer Man's garment, that he has been mocking me over, are real and will be confirmed by the first photo analysis expert who looks at them. Ray asks us to tolerate his coming in and doubting Buell Frazier, whose witnessing pretty much puts an end to Bob's gratuitous doubt.
What is not being honestly discussed on the Education Forum or the ROKC site is that Davidson's enchancement has yet to be shown to Buell Frazier to see if he recognizes Sarah Stanton. Frazier needs to be briefed on the controversy according to the latest best evidence (Davidson) and asked if he was facing and talking to Sarah Stanton when Calvery ran up, as he said in testimony. He needs to be shown the whole thing as we have arrived at it with the best analysis. That hasn't happened because the pro-Murphy people don't want to hear the obvious answer Frazier will give.
DiEugenio backing the ROKC troll group only shows the serious danger of the Murphy Syndrome. We have arrived and proven the person is Depository employee Sarah Stanton. These dishonest Murphy-ites know this which is why they have parlayed dishonest banning into ignoring the subject. They don't want to admit I single-handedly demolished them and Murphy. They'll try their best to go after you personally but it's obvious the only reason they are doing it is to avoid admitting they've been debunked. They have the full approval of Lone Nutter Steve Logan on their site.
.
When Bob went over to the ROKC forum and verified from fantasy theory guru Greg Parker that indeed Buell Frazier had said directly that Shelley was memorably slightly taller than Lovelady, Bob's reaction to this iron-clad confirmation shows his true stripes as a Murphy-ite. He attacks Buell Frazier - a person who knew Shelley and direct witness who was there - and says he isn't credible, even though the quote is innocent and not formed in relation to any Elm St Extension questions. Bob's reaction to evidence he doesn't want to hear is a good example of the dishonest dynamic by which this Murphy nonsense has been promulgated. His obvious denial will have no penalty or remonstration from the community and he might even be in line for a Lancer Excellence In Research award for his contemptuous denial of the facts. Here we are forced to once again endure an everything-but-the-truth analysis used to counter this unwelcome information delivered with utmost sincerity and righteous indignation by Bob. The one thing we can't allow is that this lock stock and barrel confirmation proves that Lovelady and Shelley are the two men walking down the Elm St Extension, and we don't need further years-worth of pro-Murphy bullshit on it.
Thomas Graves is nothing but an irritating troll who has free reign to violate all the dishonest restrictions Gordon placed on me when I was cleaning the clocks of his favored pro-Murphy posters. While pretending he was enforcing strict academic rules instead of just protecting his friends who were losing, James Gordon has since allowed the Education Forum to degenerate in to a chat room like atmosphere where any kind of idiotic comment is OK as long as it comes from his favored posters. The only rule over there is who accepts the pro-Murphy corrupted moderation and who doesn't. The Education Forum will never be credible as long as he is in charge. It is obvious to me that the room is UK-biased and that since ROKC is UK-based they have free reign with the British crook Gordon. - Knowing that Davidson verified Prayer Woman in Wiegman Graves has pulled the obnoxious move of showing a graphic from Davidson that puts a camera in Prayer Man's hands and shows him as Oswald. Graves, who gets away with deliberate deceit from the wit-less non-moderator Gordon, is doing this because, in his usual trouble-making way, he is trying to stir up conflict in order to get around answering for Davidson's most pertinent evidence - the woman's face that is backed by his metadata. No one points out to Graves that the Oswald with camera image Davidson fabricated shows Oswald lifting the viewfinder to his eye. No one points out to these pro-Murphy trouble-makers that they were saying the glowing hand was the Imperial Reflex top viewfinder reflecting through the lens and that they are directly contradicting their own claims while pretending not to notice.
For credible analyzers, we have already proven the glowing object is Sarah Stanton's hand, as indicated by the rounded knuckles and slits between the fingers seen on this object at best resolution. Of course, the everything-except-what-it-is approach of the pro-Murphy posters automatically disallows this proof as its main objective, but the first credible photo analyzer will confirm it as soon as they get a hold of the originals. Sarah is holding her purse in both hands while her right hand glows in sun. Andrej Stancak is a would be expert pretending to be a skilled analyzer. He gets praised by Larry Hancock who doesn't answer for his failures and Gordon, having no skill himself, uses their opinion as guidance, ignoring all the proof and censoring in favor of the people who have just been out-argued while claiming a sensitivity to content. When I pointed out that Stancak did not put a cartoon graphic for Prayer Man in to his overlay image because he realized it didn't fit the dishonest pro-Murphy posters ignored it. No one asked Stancak on the Education Forum why he didn't place a cartoon graphic for Prayer Man in the overlay image? The obvious answer is he did and when he did he realized it didn't fit and therefore proved what I was saying. Gordon knew Stancak was in deep trouble so he solved the problem by banning me without explanation.
Sorry Bob but you can't call for evidence and then ignore it when it shows up. Buell Frazier was a person who knew Shelley directly and clearly said Shelley appeared slightly taller than Lovelady. It is time for you to stop filling these boards with dishonest doubt designed to bolster the now-refuted Prayer Man theory and accept the evidence. Be honest and admit that the only reason you were pursuing these peripheral cases of Depository evidence was to loosen the witnessing in order to fit Murphy in. Ray Mitcham's denial of Frazier's comment is a perfect example of the intentional dishonesty I am talking about. Mitcham is a world class fool whose lack of skill prevents him from realizing the buttons on Prayer Man's garment, that he has been mocking me over, are real and will be confirmed by the first photo analysis expert who looks at them. Ray asks us to tolerate his coming in and doubting Buell Frazier, whose witnessing pretty much puts an end to Bob's gratuitous doubt.
What is not being honestly discussed on the Education Forum or the ROKC site is that Davidson's enchancement has yet to be shown to Buell Frazier to see if he recognizes Sarah Stanton. Frazier needs to be briefed on the controversy according to the latest best evidence (Davidson) and asked if he was facing and talking to Sarah Stanton when Calvery ran up, as he said in testimony. He needs to be shown the whole thing as we have arrived at it with the best analysis. That hasn't happened because the pro-Murphy people don't want to hear the obvious answer Frazier will give.
DiEugenio backing the ROKC troll group only shows the serious danger of the Murphy Syndrome. We have arrived and proven the person is Depository employee Sarah Stanton. These dishonest Murphy-ites know this which is why they have parlayed dishonest banning into ignoring the subject. They don't want to admit I single-handedly demolished them and Murphy. They'll try their best to go after you personally but it's obvious the only reason they are doing it is to avoid admitting they've been debunked. They have the full approval of Lone Nutter Steve Logan on their site.
.