10-03-2017, 01:40 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-03-2017, 07:55 AM by Albert Doyle.)
Bart Kamp is quoting Dallas newspaper articles that repeat Ochus Campbell's story of seeing Oswald in a storage closet on the 1st floor shortly after the assassination. The Murphy-ites are trumping this witnessing up in order to suggest Campbell saw Oswald enter from the Prayer Man position into the lobby storage closet where he was seen by Campbell.
First of all, the first Dallas Morning News article Kamp quotes obviously mixes up Baker's lunchroom encounter with Campbell's account. Common sense tells you that Baker and Truly did not confront Oswald in the foyer because others would have seen it. Kamp displays both his lack of research ability and honesty by ignoring this. What Kamp is telling you to believe is that Baker held a gun at Oswald in the lobby immediately upon entering and no one noticed. Smart people will realize the reason "Excellence In Research" Kamp doesn't mention these details is because he knows they refute his dishonest suggestion.
There's two reasonable explanations for Campbell's witnessing. The more likely one is that Campbell got back in to the building 3 minutes after the shots and simply saw the Oswald that was walking past Mrs Reid who had descended to the lobby by then. Kamp ignores that Campbell said he went to the Knoll before going back to the lobby. This pretty much tells you his witnessing of Oswald in the storage closet was minutes after the shots. Kamp offers an oversimplified case that ignores the Oswald in the storage closet may have been a CIA double who was trying to hide from Baker. There is nothing in Campbell's statement that necessitates the storage closet Oswald being Prayer Man nor does it exclude him from simply being Oswald who had descended to the lobby by then from the lunchroom encounter. If Campbell's encounter happened while Oswald was in the lunchroom then he's simply the other Oswald who either left out the front and was seen by Roger Craig or the Oswald who left out the back and was seen by Frazier. Kamp is trying to infer this is Prayer Man but we have already proven Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton, even if the Campbell Oswald was there immediately after the shots.
.
First of all, the first Dallas Morning News article Kamp quotes obviously mixes up Baker's lunchroom encounter with Campbell's account. Common sense tells you that Baker and Truly did not confront Oswald in the foyer because others would have seen it. Kamp displays both his lack of research ability and honesty by ignoring this. What Kamp is telling you to believe is that Baker held a gun at Oswald in the lobby immediately upon entering and no one noticed. Smart people will realize the reason "Excellence In Research" Kamp doesn't mention these details is because he knows they refute his dishonest suggestion.
There's two reasonable explanations for Campbell's witnessing. The more likely one is that Campbell got back in to the building 3 minutes after the shots and simply saw the Oswald that was walking past Mrs Reid who had descended to the lobby by then. Kamp ignores that Campbell said he went to the Knoll before going back to the lobby. This pretty much tells you his witnessing of Oswald in the storage closet was minutes after the shots. Kamp offers an oversimplified case that ignores the Oswald in the storage closet may have been a CIA double who was trying to hide from Baker. There is nothing in Campbell's statement that necessitates the storage closet Oswald being Prayer Man nor does it exclude him from simply being Oswald who had descended to the lobby by then from the lunchroom encounter. If Campbell's encounter happened while Oswald was in the lunchroom then he's simply the other Oswald who either left out the front and was seen by Roger Craig or the Oswald who left out the back and was seen by Frazier. Kamp is trying to infer this is Prayer Man but we have already proven Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton, even if the Campbell Oswald was there immediately after the shots.
.