15-04-2017, 06:14 PM
At KennedysandKing.com we have posted an excerpt from Bart Kamp's very long essay, actually a pamphlet, which examines the encounter with a lot of new evidence and analysis. His work won an award at JFK Lancer last year. Personally, I think its is well deserved.
As I write in my intro, this whole Baker/Truly/Oswald meet up is beginning to look more and more like a WC shibboleth which the first generation critics managed to let slide by, sort of like the ersatz "fact" that Oswald ordered the (wrong) rifle.
Bart really did a lot of new research on this and summoned a multiplicity of new sources. Al Rossi did a nice job of excerpting the essay. I think its provocative and unique work. It asks the implicit question: did the WC get anything right?
https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kenne...r-excerpts
As I write in my intro, this whole Baker/Truly/Oswald meet up is beginning to look more and more like a WC shibboleth which the first generation critics managed to let slide by, sort of like the ersatz "fact" that Oswald ordered the (wrong) rifle.
Bart really did a lot of new research on this and summoned a multiplicity of new sources. Al Rossi did a nice job of excerpting the essay. I think its provocative and unique work. It asks the implicit question: did the WC get anything right?
https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kenne...r-excerpts