18-04-2017, 04:03 AM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:You are the one who is being dishonest.
We published "excerpts" from it. You do know what an excerpt is eh?
You had to go fishing from an extremely long pamphlet in order to mix up the issue.
So what the heck are you saying in your latest Roy Cohn/ Joe McCarthy incarnation?
That someone has made you the Grand Inquisitor or Torquemada? And whoever did that has given you the right of divine intervention to go ahead and condemn anyone for even being associated with someone who thinks differently than you do on this issue? Is that what you are saying? What utter pomposity. Don't make me puke.
I should have known something was up with you with your utterly hapless defense of Peter Janney.
Thanks Jim.
You're not seriously trying to suggest that I violated some kind of (yet again undefined) rule or ethic by actually reading and quoting the real contents of Bart's essay that you praised on Kennedy's & King?
You praised the essay and claimed it did not attempt to put Oswald on the front steps. On pages 28 and 29 Kamp is showing a large image of the Wiegman frame with a number one over Prayer Man. On page 28 Kamp indexes that image with the caption:
Quote:In case you are wondering who is below No. 1, that is Prayer man who is Lee Oswald.
Jim, Bart's essay, whether excerpted or not, very much openly tries to put Oswald out front on the landing. Oh, by the way, you gave no answer to the serious flaws in the excerpted parts I exposed in post #12.
I'm curious for an answer over how Kamp could be just trying to show Oswald was eating lunch on the 1st floor, as you chastised before, and be Oswald out on the front steps at the same time?
Oh, and thank you for bringing Janney up as well in the same vein...
Nobody is above facts and correct argument no matter what their assassination community politics are...