06-12-2017, 12:51 AM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Blah, blah blah Cliff.
You have been saying the same thing about this case for years, probably decades. Even people on our side disagree with you, like Pat Speer.
Pat wrote today:
(quote on, emphasis added)
This is stuff I discovered years ago, and discussed in my 2014 presentation at Bethesda, which represented the final nail in the single-bullet theory. (If the first nail was Fonzi's discussion with Specter--where Specter couldn't get the clothing to rise--the last nail, IMO, was my presentation in Bethesda, where WC counsel Burt Griffin stormed out of the room when I proved that Arlen Specter called the wound a back wound until he was shown a picture of the wound proving it was on the back and too low to support the single-bullet theory, whereupon he started calling it a "back-of-the-neck" wound.
(quote off)
On one hand Pat acknowledges the prima facie case for conspiracy -- wielding it wickedly well with Burt Griffin -- but then he always claims JFK was shot in the back at T1, requiring multiple inches of clothing to rise.
I guess the cognitive dissoance made Pat giddy about himself, but debunking the sbt is no big deal -- that JFK was shot in the throat from the front is a major deal, a fact Pat obfuscates.