03-02-2018, 09:01 PM
Quote:the 's' I believe is a Freudian slip
Well, then so is the "were" (should be "was" if he was referring to a single person). OK, we can't rule out poor grammar or failure to proofread but its still intriguing.
Document - Oswald Was CIA+ - [likely forgery]
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Document - Oswald Was CIA+ - [likely forgery] - by Peter Lemkin - 03-02-2018, 07:03 AM
Document - Oswald Was CIA+ - [likely forgery] - by Phil Dagosto - 03-02-2018, 08:27 PM
Document - Oswald Was CIA+ - [likely forgery] - by Phil Dagosto - 03-02-2018, 09:01 PM
Document - Oswald Was CIA+ - [likely forgery] - by Jim DiEugenio - 04-02-2018, 05:39 AM
Document - Oswald Was CIA+ - [likely forgery] - by Peter Lemkin - 04-02-2018, 06:11 AM
Document - Oswald Was CIA+ - [likely forgery] - by Alan Ford - 05-02-2018, 09:51 PM
|