Even more evidence of reliance upon a hastily contrived script to frame an innocent partyrather than actual facts-- is also evident surrounding a jacket officialdom says belonged to the wrongly accused, whoaccording to them discarded it in an adjacent parking lot as he made his getaway after Tippit's demise. The jacket can be seen here ---->
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=9547&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9547&stc=1)
Please take a good, long look at their "evidence" above, because we'll come back to view that "evidence" w/more scrutiny later.
During the House Select Committee on Assassinations in the late 1970's, largely upon the testimony of 10th & Patton eyewitness Jack Tatum (who drove by/through the Tippit murder scene) the point-blank headshot into the right temple of the fallen officer was addressed/described as, quote, "a coup de grace."
Rather than insert that grotesque picture here of the fallen officer bearing that head wound, I'll respect that some of you reading along may be having lunch, dinner,etc. That said, let's now return to the jacket image above.
Ask yourselves, IF the wrongly accused was actually wearing this trumped up evidentiary jacket, and fired an up close and personal shot into a fellow human being's temple, Where is the blood back spatter evidence upon the jacket?
Did that normal back spatter blood--that blows back to the surface of the energy from whence it came--come under a magical spell somehow, and simply disappear altogether ?
Hasn't there been enough magic produced in the "evidence" against the wrongly accused already….magic bullets, magical self-cleaning coats...
There is no blood spatter evidence there becauseas with all of the other "evidence" in this case against the wrongly accused, the "evidence" is just that, contrived "evidence"… contrary to reality, resting solely upon magic/manure spread amid a hastily contrived script to frame an innocent party.
Again, thank goodness this case is now under review for a much closer examination in the new millennium.
Please take a good, long look at their "evidence" above, because we'll come back to view that "evidence" w/more scrutiny later.
During the House Select Committee on Assassinations in the late 1970's, largely upon the testimony of 10th & Patton eyewitness Jack Tatum (who drove by/through the Tippit murder scene) the point-blank headshot into the right temple of the fallen officer was addressed/described as, quote, "a coup de grace."
Rather than insert that grotesque picture here of the fallen officer bearing that head wound, I'll respect that some of you reading along may be having lunch, dinner,etc. That said, let's now return to the jacket image above.
Ask yourselves, IF the wrongly accused was actually wearing this trumped up evidentiary jacket, and fired an up close and personal shot into a fellow human being's temple, Where is the blood back spatter evidence upon the jacket?
Did that normal back spatter blood--that blows back to the surface of the energy from whence it came--come under a magical spell somehow, and simply disappear altogether ?
Hasn't there been enough magic produced in the "evidence" against the wrongly accused already….magic bullets, magical self-cleaning coats...
There is no blood spatter evidence there becauseas with all of the other "evidence" in this case against the wrongly accused, the "evidence" is just that, contrived "evidence"… contrary to reality, resting solely upon magic/manure spread amid a hastily contrived script to frame an innocent party.
Again, thank goodness this case is now under review for a much closer examination in the new millennium.