17-07-2009, 07:19 PM
Ed,
What you're on to, I think, is a most important realization regarding attacks on ostensibly well-protected targets -- human and otherwise.
The common denominator you've noticed: security stripping.
Protection was compromised -- if not stripped entirely -- from the following targets of interest: JFK, MLK, Rabin, Diana, 9-11 targets (WTC, Pentagon continental US).
RFK's "security" was minimal and wholly ineffective so as to render the stripping exercise unnecessary. So too with Malcolm X.
Understand that the vast majority of security personnel in all of these cases were NOT complicit in the attacks. Key players in the protective organizations, however, surely were.
CD
What you're on to, I think, is a most important realization regarding attacks on ostensibly well-protected targets -- human and otherwise.
The common denominator you've noticed: security stripping.
Protection was compromised -- if not stripped entirely -- from the following targets of interest: JFK, MLK, Rabin, Diana, 9-11 targets (WTC, Pentagon continental US).
RFK's "security" was minimal and wholly ineffective so as to render the stripping exercise unnecessary. So too with Malcolm X.
Understand that the vast majority of security personnel in all of these cases were NOT complicit in the attacks. Key players in the protective organizations, however, surely were.
CD