13-10-2013, 12:55 PM
David Guyatt Wrote:I'm more inclined to think those responsible were the "Defence of the Realm" boys rather than the Palace, Pete. But I doubt we'll ever find out via a real police investigation. My guess is despite the EXpress pushing the story it will quietly fade and be forgotten. Too much at stake imo.
Agreed it will go nowhere. It may well evidence family dissatisfaction with the official narrative though - in fact I think it probably does. Mohamed al-Fayed can safely be ignored by TPTB - the hatchet job on him, together with his own ham-fistedness is assurance enough of that - but skeletons being rattled by the Althorps and their Argentinian connections? Hmmm that's another matter entirely; not to mention the cognitive dissonance that her two sons must be wrestling with.
I have recently been reading the series of books by Aussi John Morgan. Most are dry dense but massively detailed deconstructions of the Dianna inquest - but no less illuminating for that if you can wade through them. But his last one in the series "The Paris-London Connection" is both short and massively enlightening, being a sort of potted summary of the other 5. It is available as an eBook. I challenge anyone to read it with an open mind and still conclude Diana died in an accident.
I agree David's 'Defense of the Realm Boys' attribution but pose the question 'where does that definition end and the Royal Household begin?'
My answer is that there's a seamless continuity. All Special Forces/Intel/Military officers swear allegiance to the Crown. We are regularly harangued about the implications of 'constitutional Monarchy' for allegedly real Royal power, but frankly most of that is for the gullible. 'Royal prerogative' powers are still greater in their scope than those of Parliament itself, up to and including declaring war. They are legally vested in the Prime Minister of the day but anyone who thinks the holder of that office does anything of significance these days other than on the advice of the Privy Council and/or other Deep State constructs, is living in cloud cuckoo land.
The relationship between our present day Royal Household and Establishment upper echelons is essentially unchanged from medieval times. I think the anguished question posed by Henry II about Thomas Becket in 1170 "Will nobody rid me of this turbulent priest?" and its consequences is probably a pretty accurate analogy of what happened with Diana Prices of Wales.
Peter Presland
".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn
[/SIZE][/SIZE]
".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn
[/SIZE][/SIZE]