16-01-2011, 05:12 PM
Again, how much of Zapruder's jiggling of the camera is his own and how much is added in the alteration? Even if the Zapruder Film is altered (it probably is, knowing those CIA bastards) you've created a blank canvas in which to insert any creative suggestion you like to fit your theory. For instance, OK, let's accept Connally's "rodeo wave" of his Stetson is forged, why then would CIA continue to have Connally grip his hat all the way down to the floor as seen in the film? This would only draw doubts because it would show Connally never releasing his hat, as it does. Why would they do that? It would only draw suspicion on the film and what it shows. You have them committing a full free-for-all alteration. Since they can do anything they like at that point, why would they commit such an obvious error?
You can't expect an amateur cameraman to not jiggle the camera, especially with loud gunshots and an assassination happening in front of him, as well as testimony he had vertigo and had to be stabilized by another person standing behind him. To be honest with you I see CTer's cutting corners they wouldn't let the other side get away with here.
You can't expect an amateur cameraman to not jiggle the camera, especially with loud gunshots and an assassination happening in front of him, as well as testimony he had vertigo and had to be stabilized by another person standing behind him. To be honest with you I see CTer's cutting corners they wouldn't let the other side get away with here.