30-05-2011, 05:51 PM
Seamus Coogan Wrote:I'm open to it in some ways but why am I not cool about putting a cardboard role up against a camera imitating a scope to me and using the Altgens photo as evidence (when it was on a totally lower elevation) is just plain stoopid. As for 180 degrees shooting archs and sniper angles where did you get that? Are you also saying the fatal head shot came from the Southside as well Al? What CIA hitman (often free lance or hired ie they're not quite as in-house as people think) would wanna take shot through a wind sheild with a low cal rifle? Nope I'm sticking with more or less to the Elm side of the Plaza.
I've always held the position that if a bullet went through the windshield there would be no doubt about it. That there would be a clear, fully-blown and visible bullet hole for all to see that would leave no doubt. Perhaps some materials fell out after a bullet impacted the inside of the windshield making it appear as a clean bullet hole later on.
Weldon makes a good point when he says the weather was not predictable. Therefore the bubble top could have been in place if the showers continued during the motorcade. So it is possible a windshield shot was planned for that contingency.
Weldon makes a good case that the middle man usually sitting in the front seat was removed for the Dallas motorcade. You are looking at pure evidence of a CIA coup d etat there since no mafia men or Cubans could have ordered that. It also suggests a planned shot from the south knoll.
In the end we can't prove that the windshield wasn't just nicked and removed in the Ford plant just to head-off ALL evidence. However the logic still stands that Altgens captured the windshield damage at a time where it can't correspond to any of the official shots. The best we can do is say the magic bullet was faked and the windshield damage came from a fragment from that shot. But if you compute that with the magic bullet shot wounds it still doesn't make sense. So all evidence and logic points towards the windshield shot being a separate shot. It would also explain Kennedy's neck wound being an entrance wound.
A shot from the south knoll would also correspond to the CIA sniper tactic of setting-up a kill shot opposite the diversion shot. But also a simple crossfire triangulation. The combination of Grassy Knoll, South Knoll, Dal-Tex, and possibly Depository would more than cover the need for an assured kill.
If the head shot was from the rear then the angle of Kennedy's head at 23 degrees left would correspond to a shot exiting on the right side of his head. I won't commit to this because I'm now a believer in the temple shot seen by Crenshaw. I didn't believe in it before but I've since been persuaded by the overt level of corruption in the evidence I didn't think was possible. I've seen enough proof of total corruption and deep CIA control that we are now into Alice's wonderland and anything is possible as far as the evidence.
What is very interesting here is Penn Jones said he saw a woman being interviewed by a TV reporter saying she saw a shot from the south knoll. It would be very scary if we had a unknown victim whose witnessing was so dangerous that we don't even know she disappeared. So much for the bravery of our so-called "free press" in stepping-up and revealing that interview.
Oh for a photographer that caught a sharp close-up of the windshield at Parkland. Or for a conscientious Ford worker crew that switched windshields and smuggled the real one out to keep as evidence.