William F. Pepper - An Act of State - The Execution of Martin Luther King

[Tracy Riddle]

In one of Pepper's videos, he talks about Jesse Jackson coming to Chicago with a letter of introduction from Strom Thurmond. I have to wonder about the possibility of Jackson and Rev. Kyles being FBI moles within King's organization. So many of the "civil rights leaders" since MLK's death have just been speech-making self-promoters.

[Tracy Riddle]

[Peter Lemkin]

In one of Pepper's videos, he talks about Jesse Jackson coming to Chicago with a letter of introduction from Strom Thurmond. I have to wonder about the possibility of Jackson and Rev. Kyles being FBI moles within King's organization. So many of the "civil rights leaders" since MLK's death have just been speech-making self-promoters.

There are multiple reasons to suspect Jesse Jackson's complicity in the assassination....I won't review all that here and now. It is on the Forum somewhere and available on the internet in several places.



The video above covers some of the main points on the day of the assassination. There are other things from before and after too.

[Tracy Riddle]

1990 issue of Covert Action Information Bulletin with an article on the MLK assassination (big PDF):[URL="https://archive.org/download/CovertActionInformationBulletinNo34Summer1990/Covert-Action-Information-Bulletin_No-34_Summer-1990.pdf"]

https://archive.org/download/CovertActio...r-1990.pdf[/URL]

[Albert Doyle]

Pepper describes the plot:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2l6wUfNRKuw

[Tom Bowden]

I realize there has been many theories about there being a mole in MLk's party. I have heard names mentioned including Walter Williams and Jesse Jackson. Many of those in King entourage of that day have made a living off that relationship. Someone had to make the call, which resulted in King being on the balcony. My in-depth involvement with several parties begin when I signed an agreement with Jerry Ray to purchase the rifle presented in evidence for further testing after the death of James. Judge Joe Brown was an active supporter of our effort. In those days, I met with several members of the entourage and never had a good feeling about Jesse Jackson but feelings can not be presented in a court hearing. Unfortunately, the powers that be refused to let us conclude the sale and instead placed it with the Lorraine Motel Museum and we were unable to do further testing. I realize that some on this forum are supported of Pepper but I and not one of them. He does some good but he has not been successful for either Jame Earl Ray or Sirhan Sirhan. He has certainly been successful in making money.

[Peter Lemkin]

I realize there has been many theories about there being a mole in MLk's party. I have heard names mentioned including Walter Williams and Jesse Jackson. Many of those in King entourage of that day have made a living off that relationship. Someone had to make the call, which resulted in King being on the balcony. My in-depth involvement with several parties begin when I signed an agreement with Jerry Ray to purchase the rifle presented in evidence for further testing after the death of James. Judge Joe Brown was an active supporter of our effort. In those days, I met with several members of the entourage and never had a good feeling about Jesse Jackson but feelings can not be presented in a court hearing. Unfortunately, the powers that be refused to let us conclude the sale and instead placed it with the Lorraine Motel Museum and we were unable to do further testing. I realize that some on this forum are supported of Pepper but I and not one of them. He does some good but he has not been successful for either Jame Earl Ray or Sirhan Sirhan. He has certainly been successful in making money.

Isn't it rather suspicious of the 'powers that be' you mention seeing to it that the rifle winds up in a museum and thus is not able to be further inspected?....and which 'powers that be' were involved in that little move?

Jackson has never spoken to any of the really critical ideas that certainly got MLK killed...he just very mildly and glibly goes on about equality and civility - exactly the sanitized version of MLK given to the Public. I very strongly suspect Jackson for many reasons. He certainly never did anything to further the investigation of the real events of the assassination nor the framing of Ray.

[Tracy Riddle]

48 years ago today...[URL="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/01/martin-king-assassinated-us-govt-king-family-civil-trial-verdict-demands-arrests-todays-ongoing-complicit-criminal-liars.html"]

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/01/m...liars.html[/URL]

Martin King assassinated by US Govt: King Family civil trial verdict demands arrests of today's ongoing complicit criminal liars

Posted on January 11, 2016 by Carl Herman

Coretta Scott King: "We have done what we can to reveal the truth, and we now urge you as members of the media, and we call upon elected officials, and other persons of influence to do what they can to share the revelation of this case to the widest possible audience." King Family Press Conference, Dec. 9, 1999.

Dr. King's 2-minute message to you:

Dr. Martin Luther King's family and personal friend/attorney, William F. Pepper, won a civil trial that found US government agencies guilty of assassination/wrongful death. The 1999 trial, King Family versus Jowers and Other Unknown Co-Conspirators, is the only trial ever conducted on the assassination of Dr. King. The King Center fully documents the case, with full trial transcript (to more fully explain the following summary of trial evidence, here is the best article I've found).
Importantly, the following evidence demands arrests in our world of the present of those .01% liars in government and corporate media who act as ongoing criminal accomplices after the fact to protect those who assassinated Martin.
The overwhelming evidence of US government complicity found valid by the jury includes:

• US 111th Military Intelligence Group were at Dr. King's location during the assassination.
  
• 20th Special Forces Group had an 8-man sniper team at the assassination location on that day.
  
• Usual Memphis Police special body guards were advised they "weren't needed" on the day of the assassination.
  
  
• Regular and constant police protection for Dr. King was removed from protecting Dr. King an hour before the assassination.
  
• Military Intelligence set-up photographers on the roof of a fire station with clear view to Dr. King's balcony.
  
• Dr. King's room was changed from a secure 1st-floor room to an exposed balcony room.
  
• Memphis police ordered the scene where multiple witnesses reported as the source of shooting cut down of their bushes that would have hid a sniper.
  
• Along with sanitizing a crime scene, police abandoned investigative procedure to interview witnesses who lived by the scene of the shooting.
  
• The rifle Mr. Ray delivered was not matched to the bullet that killed Dr. King, and was not sighted to accurately shoot.
  

Also, the FBI acted to cause Dr. King's death by suicide. The FBI illegally spied on Dr. King, used data in attempt to split leadership, and sent Dr. King a letter promising to expose alleged sexual misconduct. This was part of the FBI's illegal COINTELPRO program.
[B]Please read the above evidence twice to be clear on its overwhelming power.[/B]
[B]The King family's attempts for a criminal trial were always denied by state and federal government. Claimed suspect, James Ray, said that his government-appointed attorney told him to sign a guilty plea to prevent the death penalty and threatened arrests of his father and brother as co-conspirators for his only part in the assassination plot: delivering a rifle. Mr. Ray produced a letter from his attorney stating the promise that Mr. Ray would receive a trial. When Mr. Ray discovered that he was solely blamed for Dr. King's assassination and would never receive a trial, Mr. Ray's subsequent recants of his guilty plea and requests for trial were denied.[/B]
[B]The US government also denied the King family's requests for independent investigation of the assassination, despite the overwhelming evidence produced at the 1999 civil trial. Dr. King's wife, Coretta, spent more than twice the number of years she was married to Martin working to get a criminal trial for her husband's assassination.[/B]
[B]Importantly, [B]the US government has never presented any evidence subject to challenge that substantiates their claim that Mr. Ray assassinated Dr. King.[/B][/B]
[B][B]The King family believes the [B]government's motivation to murder Dr. King was to prevent his imminent camp-in/Occupy at Washington, D.C. until the Vietnam War was ended and those resources directed to end poverty and invest in US hard and soft infrastructure. [/B][/B][/B]
[B][B]US corporate media did not cover the civil trial, interview the King family, and textbooks omit this information. This is crucial evidence of a controlled corporate media rejecting coverage of a game-changing story. Journalist and author, James Douglass:[/B][/B]

[B][B]"I can hardly believe the fact that, apart from the courtroom participants, only Memphis TV reporter Wendell Stacy and I attended from beginning to end this historic three-and-one-half week trial. Because of journalistic neglect scarcely anyone else in this land of ours even knows what went on in it. After critical testimony was given in the trial's second week before an almost empty gallery, Barbara Reis, U.S. correspondent for the Lisbon daily Publico who was there several days, turned to me and said, Everything in the U.S. is the trial of the century. O.J. Simpson's trial was the trial of the century. Clinton's trial was the trial of the century. But this is the trial of the century, and who's here?' "[/B][/B]

[B][B]For comparison, please consider the media coverage of O.J. Simpson's trials:[/B][/B]

[B][B]"Media coverage of the Simpson trial, which began in January 1995, was unlike any other. Over two thousand reporters covered the trial, and 80 miles of cable was required to allow nineteen television stations to cover the trial live to 91 percent of the American viewing audience. When the verdict was finally read on October 3, 1995, some 142 million people listened or watched. It seemed the nation stood still, divided along racial lines as to the defendant's guilt or innocence. During and after the trial, over eighty books were published about the event by most everyone involved in the Simpson case."[/B][/B]

[B][B]Coretta Scott King was certain of the evidence after 30 years of consideration from the 1968 assassination to the 1999 trial:[/B][/B]

[B][B]"For a quarter of a century, Bill Pepper conducted an independent investigation of the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. He opened his files to our family, encouraged us to speak with the witnesses, and represented our family in the civil trial against the conspirators. The jury affirmed his findings, providing our family with a long-sought sense of closure and peace, which had been denied by official disinformation and cover-ups. Now the findings of his exhaustive investigation and additional revelations from the trial are presented in the pages of this important book. We recommend it highly to everyone who seeks the truth about Dr. King's assassination." Coretta Scott King.[/B][/B]

[B][B]The US Department of Justice issued a report in 2000 that explained their claimed investigation into their own possible guilt in the assassination. They concluded that they found no evidence to warrant further investigation. Dr. King's son issued the following statement rebuking the "self-study" rather than independent investigation:[/B][/B]
[B][B]"We learned only hours before the Justice Department press conference that they were releasing the report of their results of their limited investigation,' which covered only two areas of new evidence concerning the assassination of Dr. King. We had requested that we be given a copy of the report a few days in advance so that we might have had the opportunity to review it in detail. Since that courtesy was not extended to us, we are only able at this time to state the following:[/B][/B]
[B][B]1. We initially requested that a comprehensive investigation be conducted by a Truth and Reconciliation Commission, independent of the government, because we do not believe that, in such a politically-sensitive matter, the government is capable of investigating itself.[/B][/B]
[B][B]2. The type of independent investigation we sought was denied by the federal government. But in our view, it was carried out, in a Memphis courtroom, during a month-long trial by a jury of 12 American citizens who had no interest other than ascertaining the truth. (Kings v. Jowers)[/B][/B]
[B][B]3. After hearing and reviewing the extensive testimony and evidence, which had never before been tested under oath in a court of law, it took the Memphis jury only one (1) hour to find that a conspiracy to kill Dr. King did exist. Most significantly, this conspiracy involved agents of the governments of the City of Memphis, the state of Tennessee and the United States of America. The overwhelming weight of the evidence also indicated that James Earl Ray was not the triggerman and, in fact, was an unknowing patsy.[/B][/B]
[B][B]4. We stand by that verdict and have no doubt that the truth about this terrible event has finally been revealed.[/B][/B]
[B][B]5. We urge all interested Americans to read the transcript of the trial on the King Center website and consider the evidence, so they can form their own unbiased conclusions.[/B][/B]
[B][B]Although we cooperated fully with this limited investigation, we never really expected that the government report would be any more objective than that which has resulted from any previous official investigation."[/B][/B]
[B][B][B]Let's summarize: Under US Civil Law, covert US government agencies were found guilty of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King. Dr. King was the leading figure of the Civil Rights Movement, a Nobel Peace Prize winner, and widely recognized as one of the world's greatest speakers for what it means to be human. The family's conclusion as to motive was to prevent Dr. King from ending the Vietnam War because the government wanted to continue its ongoing illegal covert and overt military operations to control foreign governments and their resources.[/B][/B][/B]
[B][B]It is therefore a factual statement that under US Civil Law, the US government assassinated Dr. King.[/B][/B]
[B][B]People of sufficient intellectual integrity and moral courage to apply critical thinking skills will embrace the trial evidence and testimony, jury conclusion, and King family analysis as appropriate and helpful information in seeking the facts.[/B][/B]
[B][B]People who at least temporarily reject challenging information out of fear might say something like, "The government killed Dr. King? That's a crazy conspiracy theory!"[/B][/B]
[B][B]Let's consider that statement.[/B][/B]
[B][B]When someone says that a body of evidence is "crazy," or a "conspiracy theory" (meaning an irrational claim easily refuted by the evidence) that's a claim. With a claim comes a burden of proof. In this case, the person would have to demonstrate command of the facts to explain and prove why the evidence from the civil trial is somehow "crazy" and refute the evidence.[/B][/B]
[B][B]If the person can do this, it would be tremendously helpful in understanding the facts. However, we know from our experience that such statements almost always have zero factual support, and that the person making such a claim literally doesn't know what they're talking about.[/B][/B]
[B][B]We also know from our experience, a person making such a statement is really voicing an emotional reaction something closer to, "The government killed Dr. King? Ok, I read and understood the paragraphs about the trial and evidence. I read Mrs. King's and her son's statement. I haven't invested the time to verify how valid that information is. I'm not stupid, but because the implications of what that means is so disturbing, I'm going to deny anything about it could possibly be true as my first response. If I'm going to continue being in denial and refuse to discuss the evidence, I'll attack the messenger."[/B][/B]
[B][B]We also need to consider the lack of coverage by US corporate media of this compelling evidence, trial verdict, and King family testimony from over 30 years' analysis of the facts. Recall the evidence of US corporate media reporting being infiltrated by CIA agents to propagandize Americans' access to information. This included the Director of the CIA's admission to Congress that they have over 400 agents working in corporate media to make the US public believe what the CIA wants them to believe.[/B][/B]
[B][B]In 2006, George Washington University used a Freedom of Information Act request to obtain the US military's "Information Operations Roadmap." This formerly secret and approved document details present US government strategies to generate propaganda, and then attack Internet alternative media that provides dangerous facts and discussion. The military promoted the term, "Fight the net."[/B][/B]
[B][B]Although I won't enter the burden of proof here, you may know that there are similar and related bodies of evidence that the US government assassinated other American leaders. The 1975 Senate Church Committee disclosed that the US government initiated and helped assassination attempts on multiple foreign heads of state.[/B][/B]
[B][B]If we were discussing how the population of some other nation could employ critical thinking skills to understand current events from anytime in history, we would certainly understand the importance to anticipate disinformation from government, danger of controlled media, and assassination as a political weapon.[/B][/B]
[B][B]Failure to do so would appropriately elicit the label attributed to the first dictator of the Soviet Union, Vladimir Lenin. Such people who believe what their government tells them when the history and present have overwhelming objective evidence to explain, document, and prove that the government is typical of so many other historical self-serving oligarchies are:[/B][/B]
[B][B]"Useful idiots."[/B][/B]
[B][B]To the extent the United States today is any different from all other nations and all other times is up to your exercise of critical thinking skills.[/B][/B]
[B][B]And that said, objective, measurable, and independently verifiable facts easily explain, document, and prove US history of Emperor's New Clothes obvious crimes:[/B][/B]

• [B][B]Unlawful and lie-began wars.[/B][/B]
  
• [B][B]Crimes Against Humanity for ongoing intentional policy of poverty that's killed over 400 million human beings just since 1995 (~75% children; more deaths than from all wars in Earth's recorded history).[/B][/B]
  
• [B][B]So-called "money" that is actually debt that creates accelerating and unpayable total debt. The .01% hide ~$30 trillion in tax havens.[/B][/B]
  
• [B][B]Destruction of nearly all rights lawfully guaranteed in the US Bill of Rights within the US Constitution, and in Orwellian inversion of limited government.[/B][/B]
  
• [B][B]"Covering the crimes" with lies by corporate media.[/B][/B]
  

[B][B][B]These crimes annually cost millions killed, billions harmed, and trillions looted, with recent history continuing literal centuries of US lie-began Wars of Aggression that involved nearly all families in two horrific global wars for colonial empire.[/B][/B][/B]
[B][B][B]An obvious question: What does the 99.99% of humanity do to end these viciously psychopathic assassinations of our best people, end lie-started Wars of Aggression, end bankster looting, and genuinely have opportunity to create a bright future for all Earth's inhabitants?[/B][/B][/B]
[B][B][B]An obvious answer: We tell the truth/facts, arrest obvious criminals, and have media broadcast our true condition so we may begin:[/B][/B][/B]

• [B][B][B]Arrests of .01% "leaders" for obvious crimes centering in war, money and lies (4-part series on arrests with videos).[/B][/B][/B]
  
• [B][B][B]Leveraging a reclaimed media, continue arrests with generous plea bargains and Truth & Reconciliation for testimony, documentary evidence, and physical evidence to best put the "Big Picture" together in preparation to build the brighter future for all Earth's inhabitants' success.[/B][/B][/B]
  
• [B][B][B]SOLUTIONS: the .01% with corporate media have suppressed solutions documented beginning with Benjamin Franklin how government can abundantly operate without taxes: monetary and credit reform allow the public to have near-instant prosperity: [B]full-employment, zero public deficits and debt, the best infrastructure we can imagine, falling prices, and release of public TRILLIONS held in "rainy day" accounts. Full documentation here and here.[/B][/B][/B][/B]
  

[B][B]In just 90 seconds, former US Marine Ken O'Keefe powerfully states the "very obvious solutions" to US/UK/Israel unlawful Wars of Aggression: arrest the obvious criminal leaders (video starts at 20:51, then finishes this episode of Cross Talk):[/B][/B]

[B][B]Bill Pepper, King family friend and attorney, explaining the assassination (start at 7:35 to avoid a glitch; 100 minutes):[/B][/B]

[B][/B]
[B][B]Dr. King's 47-minute speech to Stanford University, 1967:[/B][/B]

[B][/B]

[Peter Lemkin]

[Rolf Zaeschmar]

A little off topic, but I would like to point out that both MLK's mother and brother also died under odd circumstances:

On July 21, 1969 Alfred Daniel Williams King(aka A. D. King), 38, allegedly drowned in his swimming pool at his home in Louisville, Kentucky. He was the younger brother of Martin Luther King, Jr., and was also a Baptist minister and a civil rights activist.
MLK, Sr.: "I had questions about A.D.'s death and I still have them now. He was a good swimmer. Why did he drown? I don't know I don't know that we will ever know what happened." Naomi King, his widow, said, "There is no doubt in my mind that the system killed my husband."



http://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world...ther-king/
On July 20, 1969, 15 months after Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated, A.D. sat agitated in his home.
"They killed my brother. I'm gonna find out who did it," he told someone on the phone, within hearing of his daughter Alveda. ....
His body was discovered the morning after that anguished phone call in the bottom of the family's swimming pool. ,,,,
"Daddy was killed and put in the pool," said Alveda. "When they pulled the body out, they began to pump his chest, but no water came out. One of the emergency people said he was dead when he hit the water." Naomi flew back to Atlanta and, after identifying his body in the morgue, came to the same conclusion.
"Absolutely, he was murdered," Naomi King said. "He was an excellent swimmer. There was no water in his lungs. He was in the fetal position. He had a bruised forehead. Rings around his neck. And he was in his underwear. He was murdered."

---------

On June 30, 1974. Mrs Alberta Williams King, 70, mother of MLK, Jr. and A.D. King, shot to death at the Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta by a madman who claimed he hated Christianity and that he was on a mission to kill black ministers. Marcus Wayne Chenault Jr., 23, the gunman, told the police that his mission was to kill the Rev. Martin Luther King Sr., but he shot Mrs. King instead because she was close to him. A deacon in the church was also killed, and a parishioner was wounded.



http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/ju...hurch-1974
Mrs King's grandson Derek, who said he helped to subdue the gunman as he tried to reload a pistol, added: "He was delirious. He appeared to be in a fever. He said over and over, 'The war did this to me. It's the war.'"

https://mindcontrolblackassassins.com/20...ra-victim/
When asked if he killed anyone, Chenault could not remember, he responded accepting responsibility for the homicides with unbelievable glee and joy. Smiling, he said, "I assume I did, I assume I shot someone."



/