Has anyone seen this photo?

[Phil Dragoo]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]4437[/ATTACH]

Russians produced a photo comparison of a mujahideen and Ahmadinejad which presented problems, nose anomalies et cetera.

Alexander Jason disputed the Kommersant photocomparison's conclusion: http://www.flickr.com/photos/confederate...298821975/

[Gordon Gray]

Looking at photos of Steve Wilson, it could also be him IMO.
He was at No Name Key and later Lake Poncetrian.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4438[/ATTACH]

[David Josephs]

Looking at photos of Steve Wilson, it could also be him IMO.
He was at No Name Key and later Lake Poncetrian.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4438[/ATTACH]

Thanks Gordon.... If this guy was running from a scene and you were shown Oswald's photo... I bet MANY would say that was Oswald...

Cheers
DJ

[Charles Drago]

So ya
Thought ya
Might like to
Go to the show.
To feel that warm
thrill of confusion,
That space cadet glow.
I've got some bad news for you sunshine,
Pink isn't well, he stayed back at the hotel
And they sent us along as a surrogate band
We're gonna find out where you folks really stand.

Are there any queers in the theater tonight?
Get them up against the wall!
There's one in the spotlight, he don't look right to me,
Get him up against the wall!
That one looks Jewish!
And that one's a coon!
Who let all of this riff-raff into the room?
There's one smoking a joint,
And another with spots!

If I had my way,
I'd have all of you shot!

Are you suggesting that I'm an anti-Semite?

A racist?

A homophobe?

If so, drop the veiled references and say so.

Meanwhile, we await your response to the following:

Do you stand by your assertion that there is good reason (which you've yet to state) to conclude that the photo was taken at No Name Key "before anyting [sic] else"?

Because THAT is the question I originally raised, and THAT is the question you are dodging.

Answer the question. Share with us why the No Name Key identification should be accepted "before anyting [sic] else". Show us why you made that knee-jerk assertion.

You made the assertion.

Defend it.

The longer you hide and cower, the clearer your true nature becomes.

You are revealed now to be a moral and intellectual coward.



Twisted tongues will place you in their category
Face to face, you'll hear them tell a different story
Loose lips may sink ships but honesty's forever
Eyes of envy try to cut and try to sever

Cowards that hide behind their words
Don't care if feelings will get hurt
Beware the voice without a face
That's hidden underneath them

Covered in cowardice
Can't you see them?
Covered in cowardice
Can't you hear them?

Beware the voice without a face
That's hidden underneath a

Covered in cowardice
Can't you see them?
Covered in cowardice
Can't you hear them?

Cowards that hide behind their words
Don't care whose feelings will get hurt
Their eyes are blinded by their rage
Beware the voice without a face

-- BILLY TALENT

[David Josephs]

I don't you need you to tell me ANYTHING about this case.

Stick to your word Charles.... your 30 seconds was over long ago.

Learn a little civility and some manners... now you're just boring me.

[Charles Drago]

I don't you need you to tell me ANYTHING about this case.

Stick to your word Charles.... your 30 seconds was over long ago.

Learn a little civility and some manners... now you're just boring me.

Do you stand by your assertion that there is good reason (which you've yet to state) to conclude that the photo was taken at No Name Key "before anyting [sic] else"?

Because THAT is the question I originally raised, and THAT is the question you are dodging.

Answer the question. Share with us why the No Name Key identification should be accepted "before anyting [sic] else". Show us why you made that knee-jerk assertion.

You made the assertion.

Defend it.

The longer you hide and cower, the clearer your true nature becomes.

You are revealed now to be a moral and intellectual coward.

[Magda Hassan]

All posts not on topic or using ad homs have been moderated. Next stop Bear Pit.

[David Josephs]

All posts not on topic or using ad homs have been moderated. Next stop Bear Pit.

Thank you Magda... greatly appreciated

[Greg Burnham]

Like Charlie, I too am no botanist--nor am I a facial recognition enthusiast. However, it is a slippery slope when we begin to attempt to speculate about the identity of an individual seen in a photo
and the location depicted therein given that we have NO reliable basis upon which to make such claims if we were to choose to speculate. Moreover, even the provenance of the material itself has
not been forthcoming.

But, if I must speculate as others have seen fit to do in this thread...then I think that the individual seen at the very beginning of this clip could be David Mantik! Look at the similarity to the fellow
in the screenshot below. So why would David Mantik be in the same film as Steve Wilson and/or LHO at Lake Poncha--No-Name-Key--train?

Answer: Don't speculate based on superficial similarity. Beware that dopplegangers abound!

[David Josephs]

Agree completely Greg...

Which is why I usually just create as decent a comparison as I can and post it to be analyzed/reviewed and discussed...

The image in the film is much to fuzzy for an ID yet you might agree that the similarities are striking in the collage of faces.
To the Steve Wilson image, he too could get away with being considered an Oswald "look-alike"... NOT that he ever did or was used as such...

Even a blind man knows when the sun is shining.... he can feel it.

.......
Whether I jumped to a conclusion, or stated an educated guess... I needn't have to put up with what was directed toward me. Others may feel differently...
I sometimes forget that all we can control is our own presentation.. our own emotions...

I should have simply ignored the approach from the start.... and let cooler heads prevail.

I apologize to the membership if I diverted their attentions needlessly by choosing to call it as I saw it.

DJ