Breaking: Explosion Reported at Boston Marathon's Finish Line

[Lauren Johnson]

Stella Tremblay, New Hampshire Legislator, Says U.S. Government Planned Boston Bombing
The Huffington Post | By John Celock
Like us? www.facebook.com/Citizens.Action.Network


I just called her office and voiced my support. Then sent her an email voicing my strong support.
I found her contact info via google.

This is BIG!!!

Dawn

Anybody who links to Judy Woods is suspect, in my book. And she does.

[Magda Hassan]

If you haven't done so I recommend watching Sibel Edmond's video posted earlier in this thread. I will post it below as well.

Friday, 26. April 2013Boiling Frogs Post Vindicated in Its Analyses of Boston Terror & PredictionsOver a week ago I began my interview and analyses series on hidden connections and intended objectives in the Boston Terror Case. In our Boiling Frogs Post EyeOpener Report with James Corbett I offered two connected likely outcomes as a result of Washington-Scripted and CIA-Connected Boston Terror Case:

1- Our Back-Door Deal with Russia on Syria: Our soon-to-come Invasion of Syria immediately following the Boston Terror incident with Russia removing itself as an obstacle
2- Rise in "Radical Islamic Terror" in Russia's Caucasus-mainly in Chechnya and Dagestan region
3- Per Washington's consent a major Russian crack-down in Caucasus- US-Western governments support attributing this to Russia's contribution in countering Global Islamic Terrorism

The following BREAKING NEWS confirms our analysis and prediction for #2 above:

FSB: 140 Detained in Moscow for Connection to Islamist Extremist Groups'Russia's Federal Security Service announced that 140 people have been detained in the Russian capital for suspected membership in extremist Islamist organizations.More than 30 of those detained are reportedly foreign nationals, the FSB said in a statement. According to law enforcement, the chapel in southern Moscow where the suspects were detained was often visited by people who later "converted to radicalism and joined militant groups active in the North Caucasus, as well as participated in preparing and perpetrating terrorist acts in Russia."…

Yesterday in our Boston Terror Update2 we presented further vindication on our 3 predictions: Click HereDefense Secretary Hagel: Syria Used Chemical WeaponsPutin Urges West to Close Ranks against TerrorismRohrabacher to Pursue Working with RussiaMore People of Russia, CIS Countries Evacuated from SyriaOn April 24, we presented our Update 1 on Terror suspects' ties to the CIA and further related developments in Russia's Caucasus:Click HereIf you haven't watched our video report and analysis please do it now. Here is the report produced on April 22, 2013:

[Magda Hassan]

Boston bombers' uncle married daughter of top CIA official

Posted on April 26, 2013 by Daniel Hopsicker


The uncle of the two suspected Boston bombers in last week's attack, Ruslan Tsarni, was married to the daughter of former top CIA official Graham Fuller
The discovery that Uncle Ruslan Tsarni had spy connections that go far deeper than had been previously known is ironic, especially since the mainstrean media's focus yesterday was on a feverish search to find who might have recruited the Tsarnaev brothers.
The chief suspect was a red-haired Armenian exorcist. They were fingering a suspect who may not, in fact, even exist.
It was like blaming one-armed hippies on acid for killing your wife.

Ruslan Tsarni married the daughter of former top CIA Graham Fuller, who spent 20 years as operations officer in Turkey, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Afghanistan, and Hong Kong. In 1982 Fuller was appointed the National Intelligence Officer for Near East and South Asia at the CIA, and in 1986, under Ronald Reagan, he became the Vice-Chairman of the National Intelligence Council, with overall responsibility for national level strategic forecasting.

At the time of their marriage, Ruslan Tsarni was known as Ruslan Tsarnaev, the same last name as his nephews Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the alleged bombers.
It is unknown when he changed his last name to Tsarni.
What is known is that sometime in the early 1990's, while she was a graduate student in North Carolina, and he was in law school at Duke, Ruslan Tsarnaev met and married Samantha Ankara Fuller, the daughter of Graham and Prudence Fuller of Rockville Maryland. Her middle name suggests a reference to one of her father's CIA postings.
The couple divorced sometime before 2004.
Today Ms. Fuller lives abroad, and is a director of several companies pursuing strategies to increase energy production from clean-burning and renewable resources.
On a more ominous note, Graham Fuller was listed as one of the American Deep State rogues on Sibel Edmonds' State Secrets Privilege Gallery,. Edmonds explained it featured subjects of FBI investigations she became aware of during her time as an FBI translator.
Criminal activities were being protected by claims of State Secrets, she asserted. After Attorney General John Ashcroft went all the way to the Supreme Court to muzzle her under a little-used doctrine of State Secrets, she put up twenty-one photos, with no names.
One of them was Graham Fuller.

"Congress of Chechen International" c/o Graham Fuller

The Chechen uncle of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects, paired up with a top CIA official, who once served as CIA Station Chief in Kabul, may sound like a pitch for a bad movie:
"Get Smart Meets the Odd Couple."
But they may have been in business together.
In 1995, Tsarnaev incorporated the Congress of Chechen International Organizations in Maryland, using as the address listed on incorporation documents 11114 Whisperwood Ln, in Rockville Maryland, the home address of his then-father-in-law.
It is just eight miles up the Washington National Pike from the Montgomery Village home where "Uncle Ruslan" metand apparently wowed, the press after the attack in Boston.
The Washington Post yesterday called him a "media maven," while nationally syndicated Washington Post columnist Ester Cepeda , in a piece with the headline "The Wise Words of Uncle Ruslan" opined that he was her choice for "an award for bravery in the face of adversity."

Success through indirection, mis-direction, redirection, and protection

Uncle Ruslan's spy connections go far deeper than was already known, which was that he spent two years working in Kazakhstan for USAID.
But the mainstream media was lookng the other way.
Under the headline "Did 'Misha' influence Tsarnaevs? In Watertown, doubts," USA Today reported: "Misha. A new name has emerged in the Boston Marathon bombing caseone familiar to the family of the two young men accused of the atrocity and apparently of interest to the Russian and American security services as well."
Ruslan Tsarni was the first to bring up the supposed man's supposed name. Or rather, he brought up a first name: Misha. But it was enough. We were off to the races…

Attention all cars: Be on lookout for chubby Armenian exorcist

Tsarni described Misha to CNN as being "chubby, a big guy, big mouth presenting himself withsome kind of abilities as exorcist . . . having some part-time job in one of the stores, not married. All of the qualifications of a loser, just another big mouth."
According to Uncle Ruslan, Misha was the man who over a considerable period of time had radicalized Tamerlan.
It seemed strange, then, that in contrast to his "you are there" verbal picture of the man, even with all his supposed concerns, and given his high level of education and abundant resources (Big Sky Energy was paying him in excess of $200,00 a year, according to documents filed with the SEC) Ruslan had somehow never found out just who the bad guy was.
He never got a name, something that in spook-dom is considered something of a faux pas.Then again, no one else had either.
Worse, Tsarni's vivid description seemed to be taken from personal observation, from, in other words…real life. But that isn't possible. Tsarni had stated he hadn't been physically in the presence of his Boston relatives since December 2005. And Misha, if he existed, didn't show up on the scene until 2008 at the earliest.
Still, just a few days later, the entire family began chiming in. Misha anecdotes were flying fast & furious, and the nation's scribblers were busy uncritically scribbling down their every word.

Maybe their Twitter account got hacked again?

No performance was nearly as masterful, however, as that of the Associated Press.
"Bomb suspect influenced by mysterious radical," reported the Associated Press.
"Tamerlan's relationship with Misha could be a clue in understanding the motives behind his religious transformation and, ultimately, the attack itself," reported the Associate Press. Only to take it all back in the very next line.
"Two U.S. officials say he had no tie to terrorist groups."
The AP's "story" about the mysterious "Misha" was 1145 words, long enough for an editor to squeeze in a caveat.
"It was not immediately clear whether the FBI has spoken to Misha or was attempting to," the national wire service reported. "Efforts over several days by The Associated Press to identify and interview Misha have been unsuccessful."

The big difference: when you do it, its conspiracy theory. When we do it, its informed speculation.

In any other context, this might be seen as the rankest kind of "conspiracy theory." But, apparently, when the Associated Press does it, its news.
Then Uncle Ruslan made a clear mis-step.
"An uncle of the alleged bombers claims that Misha, an Armenian convert to Islam, had a huge influence on the elder brother, Tamerlan Tsarnaev. Describing him as an "Armenia exorcist, Tsarni said, "Somehow he just took his brain."
Armenians are a deeply-rooted Christian community, which is proud of the fact that their country was the first in the world to adopt Christianity as state religion in 301 AD.
Moreover this is the week every year when they remember the Armenian Holocaust, when as many as 1,000,000 Armenians were slaughtered by Turkish Muslims.
In the large and close-knit Boston Armenian community, a red-bearded Armenian named Misha becoming a radicalized Muslim would stand out.
"I've never heard of him, nor has anyone that I know," Hilda Avedissian, executive director at the Armenian Cultural & Educational Centre.

So what if the guy was involved with biggest bank fraud in history?

"For an Armenian to convert to Islam is like finding a unicorn in a field," Nerses Zurabyan, 32, an information technology director who lives in nearby Cambridge told USA Today.
The report reveals that the bomber's Uncle, made famous for his outspoken condemnation of his nephew's which aired repeatedly on international news networks, is a well-connected oil executive who at one point worked for a Halliburton shell company used as a front to obtain oil contracts from the Kazakh State.
Ruslon Tsarni was implicated in an investigation involving the laundering and theft of $6 billion. But everybody loves Uncle Ruslon. At least most of America's mainstream media does.
There has, to date, been no speculation at all about whether an uncle of the men suspected of the bombing who had been involved in international intrigue at the hightest levels, and who married the daughter of a top CIA official, might warrant a closer look.
It's enough, isn't it, to turn even reasonably rational adults intogasp!conspiracy theorists.
"News," someone once wrote, "is selection. And selection is always based on an ideology and agenda, which is something to remember next time you watch, listen or read the news.'"
Too true.

[Magda Hassan]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]4684[/ATTACH]

[Peter Lemkin]

Magda....don't you understand the concept of COINCIDENCE?! :p

[Don Jeffries]

The Boston bombing narrative is unraveling faster than the Sandy Hook official story. With the citizen investigators picking apart all the countless loose ends and impossible aspects of these narratives, it's pathetic to watch the dinosaur mainstream media try to conduct their usual spin. Rachel Maddow was particularly embarrassing, when she tried to ridicule an InfoWars reporter for actually asking questions.

They are adding inflammatory allegations every day to the suspects' criminal resume. I expect our daring "journalists" to expose both of them as chronic torturers of puppies next. The "reporting" on this story is just ludicrous. They don't even try to pretend that they're anything other than government mouthpieces any more. As always, be very grateful for the internet (and the surprising defeat of CISPA).

I hope the suspects' aunt and parents continue to be outspoken. The "evidence" against them continues to be nonexistent, but if the surviving brother lives to stand trial, he will be convicted. He'll have an inept defense, as all these patsies do since the days of Sacco and Vanzetti, and he'll face a typically biased judge and a typically moronic jury.

It was great to see Ron Paul blasting the martial law in Boston, and the obscene celebration afterwards, when the eligible voters chanted "USA!" over and over. Too bad there doesn't seem to be any other national political figures with the courage to speak out against the burgeoning police state, or to defend what is left of our civil liberties.

[Magda Hassan]

Maybe or maybe not reliable. Certainly no love lost between Russia and Georgia but the Russian authorities have repeatedly told the US authorities about the older brother and nothing was done. A hands off policy. It is also picked up by other media in the area including Georgia. Of course it is denied by the foundation but then it would wouldn't it? More of the Jamestown Foundation here.

Tamerlane Tsarnaev. Photo: REUTERS / Julia Malakie / The Sun of Lowell, Mass. / Handout

At the disposal of "Izvestia" has documents Counterintelligence Department Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia, confirming that the Georgian organization "Fund of Caucasus", which cooperates with the U.S. non-profit organization "Jamestown" (the board of directors of NGOs previously entered one of the ideologists of U.S. foreign policy, Zbigniew Brzezinski), was engaged in recruiting residents North Caucasus to work in the interests of the United States and Georgia.

According to the reports of Colonel Chief Directorate Counterintelligence Department Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia Gregory Chanturia to the Minister of Internal Affairs Irakli Garibashvili, "Caucasian fund" in cooperation with the Foundation "Jamestown" in the summer of 2012 conducted workshops and seminars for young people of the Caucasus, including its Russian part. Some of them attended Tsarnaev Tamerlane, who was in Russia from January to July 2012.

How do you spell GEO - POL - I - TICS?

Howzabout ZBIG - NIEW - BRZE - ZIN - SKI?

Some support for the existance of the Georgians looking to use jihadists and similar against Russia as described in the Izvestia article mentioned above.

Gorin: More Details on the Georgia-Hosted Jihadi Conference Emerge


More Details on the Georgia-Hosted Jihadi Conference Emerge
by Julia Gorin
An analysis published Monday by Defense & Foreign Affairs offers some corroboration for the Georgia-hosted, U.S.-approved jihadi confab in December,the mention of which seemed to upset some readers.

Here are the relevant excerpts from the 16-page analysis, which is subscription-only and therefore not linkable:

Meanwhile, Georgia is actively seeking to exploit the spread of jamaats[jihadist mini-societies] in the North Caucasus in order to go after the Russian pipelines in hope of ensnaring the US into actively supporting a new confrontation with Russia. In early December 2009, Tbilisi organized a high-level meeting of jihadists groups from the Middle East and Western Europe in order "to coordinate activities on Russia's southern flank." The Georgian Embassy in Kuwait, for example, arranged for travel documents for jihadists from Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States. (There is a large and very active Chechen/Circassian community in Jordan since the 19th Century that is heavily represented in the intelligence services and the military.) In Tbilisi, Deputy Minister of Internal Affairs Lordkipanadze was the host and coordinator. The meeting was attended by several Georgian senior officials who stressed that Saakashvili himself knew and approved of the undertaking. The meeting addressed the launch of both "military operations" in southern Russia and ideological warfare. One of the first results of the meeting was the launch, soon afterwards of the Russian-language TV station First Caucasian.The jihadists of the North Caucasus -- including the Arab commanders in their midst -- came out of the early December 2009 meeting convinced that Tbilisi is most interested in the spread of terrorism. The meeting was attended by, among others, Mohmad Muhammad Shabaan, an Egyptian senior commander who is also known as Seif al-Islam and who has been involved in Caucasus affairs since 1992. He took copious notes. According to Shabaan's notes, the Georgian government wants the jihadists to conduct "acts of sabotage to blow up railway tracks, electricity lines and energy pipelines" in southern Russia in order to divert construction back to Georgian territory.
Georgian intelligence promised to facilitate the arrival in the Caucasus of numerous senior jihadists by providing Georgian passports, and to provide logistical support including the reopening of bases in northern Georgia. Russian intelligence was not oblivious of the meeting. Seif al-Islam and two senior aides were assassinated on February 4, 2010. The Russians retrieved a lot of documents in the process. Moscow signaled its displeasure shortly afterwards when the presidents of Russia and Abkhazia signed a 50-year agreement on a Russian military base in order to "protect Abkhazia's sovereignty and security, including against international terrorist groups".
A major issue still to be resolved is the extent of the US culpability.

The same analysis recalls when this misguided approach was used in the Balkans, and outlines how, in order to not alienate Muslims while we tried to contain terror from the Middle East, we fortified terror in the Balkans and jump-started the global jihad:

Initially, the US-led Western intervention in the former Yugoslavia was aimed first and foremost to salvage NATO (and with it US dominance over post-Cold War Western Europe) from irrelevance and collapse. As well, the support for the Muslims of Bosnia became the counter-balance of the US confrontation with jihadism in the Middle East. Anthony Lake, US President Bill Clinton's National Security Adviser, formulated the logic for the US-led intervention on behalf of the Muslims. The US national interest "requires our working to contain Muslim extremism, and we have to find a way of being firm in our opposition to Muslim extremism while making it clear we're not opposed to Islam. If we are seen as anti-Muslim, it's harder for us to contain Muslim extremism. And if we stand by while Muslims are killed and raped in Bosnia, it makes it harder to continue our policy," Lake argued. That in the process the US would end up partnering with, supporting and arming, the very same jihadist forces Clinton was seeking to contain meant nothing to Washington. The only thing Washington cared about was the image of a US rallying to the rescue of a Muslim cause.

Note that in the 90s the U.S., like Britain, permitted and facilitated terrorist networks to operate in Bosnia and Kosovo for the purpose of Serb-killing, and along with Germany we trained Albanian and Middle Eastern terrorists in Albania. Sure enough, the same decade saw U.S. officials participating in a December 1999 meeting in Azerbaijan very similar to the December 2009 meeting in Tbilisi, where "programs for the training and equipping of mujahedin from the Caucasus, Central and South Asia, and the Arab world were discussed and agreed upon." The mention of this meeting comes in as the analysis gives background on how we decided to support terrorism against Russia:

By 1999, the US had given up on reconciling Azerbaijan and Armenia in order to construct pipelines to Turkey, and instead Washington started focusing on building pipelines via Georgia.For such a project to be economically viable, the Russian pipelines would have to be shut down. Hence, in early October 1999, senior officials of US oil companies and US officials offered representatives of Russian "oligarchs" in Europe huge dividends from the proposed Baku-Ceyhan pipeline if the "oligarchs" convinced Moscow to withdraw from the Caucasus, permit the establishment of an Islamic state, and close down the Baku-Novorossiysk oil pipeline. Consequently, there would be no competition to the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline. The "oligarchs" were convinced that the highest levels of the Clinton White House endorsed this initiative. The meeting failed because the Russians would hear nothing of the US proposal.
Consequently, the US determined to deprive Russia of an alternate pipeline route by supporting a spiraling violence and terrorism in Chechnya....The Clinton White House sought to actively involve the US in yet another anti-Russian jihad as if reliving the "good ol' days" of Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo, seeking to support and empower the most virulent anti-Western Islamist forces in yet another strategic region.
In mid-December 1999, US officials participated in a formal meeting in Azerbaijan in which specific programs for the training and equipping of mujahedin from the Caucasus, Central and South Asia, and the Arab world were discussed and agreed upon. This meeting led to Washington's tacit encouragement of both Muslim allies (mainly the intelligence services of Turkey, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia) and US "private security companies" (of the type that did Washington's dirty job in the Balkans while skirting and violating the international embargo the US formally supported) to assist the Chechens and their Islamist allies to surge in spring 2000. Citing security concerns vis-à-vis Armenia and Russia, Azerbaijan adamantly refused to permit training camps on its soil.

Now, just to keep our -- including my -- heads straight, let's remind ourselves that this exercise that Robert Spencer was good enough to let me engage in on these pages was not a defense of Russia; it was not meant to start an argument about how bad or how not-that-bad Russia is. The point is that foreign relations in a mad world require finding enough common ground with not-so-great states so that we can work together where we can work together. It's to minimize the messiness of things. Why, when we had Russia in its historically most maleable form, did we insist on provoking and provoking and provoking? Why did we make a bad situation like Russia worse when we had an opportunity to make it better? As with all problematic countries that we nonetheless find areas of cooperation with, we narrowed even those areas by dealing with the Russians in the bad faith that had been their trademark. Simultaneously, we moved away from picking the lesser evil in a given conflict, and started siding with the greater.

It's a surreal situation indeed when the actions of my savior country put me in the position of having to "defend" Russia, whose people my parents thank their lucky stars to not have to live among anymore. I myself am a self-proclaimed Russophobe; I just had no idea how much more pathological America's Russophobia is. So for someone who is loath to visit even Brighton Beach, I find myself in a surprising position here, pointing out where we went wrong and shoved Russia back into old behaviors.

Infuriatingly predictably, one of the comment posters suggested that the line I'm taking here is one that's paid for by Russia. The same "tip" was offered to Robert by a fellow blogger -- in that tone of providing "some friendly, professional, and cautionary advice." The likes of which I'm all too familiar with by now. (One Wall St. Journal fixture advised me, "Your views on this [the Balkans] are deeply misjudged...You're not doing your career any favors." Thanks. Good thing I don't have a career, then.) It certainly would be nice if anyone paid me for anything I do, but it wasn't to be in this lifetime.

Regardless, it shouldn't seem strange for someone to be pointing out that our foreign policy is being guided by people with a stronger anti-Russian agenda than anti-jihad agenda. And notice where this kind of thinking has gotten us. Take the past two decades of Western policy and media coverage in the Balkans, which were based on information that made its way into reporters' notebooks directly from the Ministry of Information of the Bosnian Government run by the fundamentalist Muslim wartime president Alija Izetbegovic. The template was used again when politicians, reporters, NGOs and human rights organizations dutifully repeated what was coming out of the KLA-run newspapers and other propaganda organs of the Kosovo separatists. And so in service to consistency, having gotten into this hole, we've kept digging. With our Yugoslavia intervention, as the Defense & Foreign Affairs analysis points out, we've ended up "demonizing the Serbs and the world of Eastern Christianity as a whole." Such that we've arrived at a place where the word "Byzantine" is now used to mean primitive or uncivilized. While the Muslim world and Islamic heritage represent the height of culture, tradition, heritage and civilization.




One interesting thing about the reactions to calling the U.S. on its aggressive alienation of Russia via, for example, the use of jihadists is the sense of outrage and shock at the suggestion that America would support these violent groups, followed immediately by a defense or justification of such tactics (e.g. "we *should* help the Chechens against the Russians"). Meanwhile, these oh-so-incendiary allegations happen to coincide with overtly stated intentions and policies. (See the late Senator Tom Lantos and his ilk applauding the creation of a U.S.-made Muslim state in Europe, which the jihadists should "take note of," Lantos hoped.)

[David Guyatt]

The Boston bombing narrative is unraveling faster than the Sandy Hook official story. With the citizen investigators picking apart all the countless loose ends and impossible aspects of these narratives, it's pathetic to watch the dinosaur mainstream media try to conduct their usual spin. Rachel Maddow was particularly embarrassing, when she tried to ridicule an InfoWars reporter for actually asking questions.

They are adding inflammatory allegations every day to the suspects' criminal resume. I expect our daring "journalists" to expose both of them as chronic torturers of puppies next. The "reporting" on this story is just ludicrous. They don't even try to pretend that they're anything other than government mouthpieces any more. As always, be very grateful for the internet (and the surprising defeat of CISPA).

I have to agree Don. Having (unusually) watched Fox News a few times over the recent week, it was remarkable how willingly wedded they are to the official narrative. It is sickening to watch.

Fortunately, more and more people are turning to the internet for independent analysis of shaped news. Sadly, the numbers are still far too small to make a significant difference.

[David Guyatt]

If you haven't done so I recommend watching Sibel Edmond's video posted earlier in this thread. I will post it below as well.

1- Our Back-Door Deal with Russia on Syria: Our soon-to-come Invasion of Syria immediately following the Boston Terror incident with Russia removing itself as an obstacle
[URL="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/2013-04/25/c_124627671.htm"]
CIS Countries Evacuated from Syria[/URL]

For me, objective No. 1, seems to be the big one of the three outlined, as it seems certain it is an important step in the long-term plan for regime change in Iran.

Russia is a full member of the Group of 8. Iran hasn't been asked to join.

Together the eight countries making up the G8 represent about 14% of the world population, but they represent about 60% of the Gross World Product[64] as measured by gross domestic product, all eight nations being within the top 12 countries according to the CIA World Factbook. (see the CIA World Factbook column in List of countries by GDP (nominal)), the majority of global military power (seven are in the top 8 nations for military expenditure[65]), and almost all of the world's active nuclear weapons.[66] In 2007, the combined G8 military spending was US$850 billion. This is 72% of the world's total military expenditures. (see List of countries and federations by military expenditures) Four of the G8 members, the United Kingdom, United States, France and Russia, together account for 9699% of the world's nuclear weapons.[67] (see List of states with nuclear weapons)

[Magda Hassan]

Some support for the existance of the Georgians looking to use jihadists and similar against Russia as described in the Izvestia article mentioned above.

Gorin: More Details on the Georgia-Hosted Jihadi Conference Emerge


More Details on the Georgia-Hosted Jihadi Conference Emerge
by Julia Gorin
An analysis published Monday by Defense & Foreign Affairs offers some corroboration for the Georgia-hosted, U.S.-approved jihadi confab in December,the mention of which seemed to upset some readers.

And more historical articles describing such a meeting:

U.S. supporting Islamic jihad against Russia

Stubbornly ignorant and unwilling to investigate the jihad doctrine, State Department officials led the U.S. into war to support jihadists in Bosnia and Kosovo. Now the same mistake is being repeated. "U.S. Supports Islamic Terror Against Russia," by Julia Gorin at Republican Riot, March 29 (thanks to Pamela):

We don't yet know the whole story behind the two female suicide bombers who killed 38 people in Moscow and injured scores of others. Although their affiliation is unclear, the working assumption is that the bombers were tied to the Chechen rebel movement in the North Caucasus.There is, however, something which we do know for sure, and which we paid no attention to despite its clear connection to the kind of terror Moscow witnessed yesterday morning.
There was a little-noted meeting that took place in December 2009, in Tbilisi, the capital of U.S. ally Georgia. That month Georgia hosted a conference of jihadists to plan "operations" against Russia. There was no news coverage of the event, and so it took a paid advertisement in the Washington Times to make it known. Stubbornly, still no news organization or blog picked up on it. And so here we are.
Below are the relevant parts of the paid-for article from last month, titled "The Georgian Imbroglio -- And a Choice for the United States." (Original emphasis preserved.) It was penned by James George Jatras, a former U.S. Foreign Service officer as well as foreign policy analyst for the U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee.

Americans must be made aware of Saakashvili's extending refuge to jihadists responsible for countless acts of terror in southern Russia and his regime's extraordinary coordination efforts to permit them to step up attacks in the Caucasus region.Specifically, according to reliable sources [with lines to two foreign intel services], in December 2009 a secret meeting took place in Tbilisi, the Georgian capital, with representatives of numerous jihad groups based in various Islamic and European countries for the purpose of coordinating their activities on Russia's southern flank. The meeting was organized under the auspices of high officials of the Georgian government; while Saakashvili himself was not present, officials of his ministry of internal affairs (allegedly G. Lordkipanidze) and others acted as hosts and coordinators. Georgian Ambassador to Kuwait Mayering-Mikadze purportedly facilitated travel for participants from the Middle East. In addition to "military" operations (i.e., attacks in southern Russia) special attention was given to ideological warfare, for example, the launching of the Russian-language TV station "First Caucasian."
Are we to believe that U.S. intelligence agencies were unaware of this meeting and other similar actions? The question then is unavoidable: has Washington decided to turn a blind eye -- or even worse, to encourage our "ally" Saakashvili to play the "jihad card" against Russia? Could such a thing be possible at a time when the world's media are filled with reports of jihad attacks in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, India, Israel, Philippines, and other countries -- not least the United States (Fort Hood, Fort Dix)? The threat comes from the same ideology that motivated the 9/11 attacks against our country and which seeks to create through violence a worldwide Islamic caliphate governed by Sharia law....

There is much more. Be sure to read it all.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/03/stubbo...ng-to.html