Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Differences Between Obama And Bush On NSA Surveillance According To Virtual Obama
#1
The Differences Between Obama And Bush On NSA Surveillance, According To Virtual Obama

from the watch-this dept

It feels like it's been a while since I've seen Xtranormal videos, but someone who shall remain nameless has put together a rather hysterical video of President Obama explaining why massive NSA surveillance under his watch is different than when it was done by President George W. Bush. As you may recall, President Obama criticized these programs while he was "Candidate Obama," but has now expanded them massively. This video explains why --

Below are some of my favorite lines... which is actually nearly a full transcript, because as I was picking out "favorite" lines, most of the video fell into that category.
It was concerning when the Bush administration was secretly collecting your information. Heck, I had concerns back then myself. But, everyone knows that George W. Bush was not a good President. Whereas, I am a good President. See the difference? So, while you could not trust George W. Bush to secretly collect your data, you can trust me. I'm a trustworthy guy.

Another important difference between my administration and the Bush administration is that when the Bush administration secretly spied on you, the Bush administration could not point to a single judge willing to say their program was legal. We, on the other hand, can point to such a judge. I'm not going to tell you who this judge is, or why he or she thinks our program is legal. If I did that, it would, obviously be harder for me to convince you that the program is legal. Instead, I'm just going to tell you that we secretly found one judge who was willingly to secretly say that it was legal for us to collect all of your data....

The Bush administration could not tell you that it had informed Congress. Whereas my administration took steps to ensure that if you ever found out about our secret surveillance program, we could tell you that we informed Congress. To be clear, when I say 'we informed Congress,' I am not saying that we did out best to ensure that Congress had enough information to have an informed debate on this vital national security issue. What I am saying is that we informed Congress enough for me to stand here and tell you that 'we informed Congress.' What Congress actually knew is not important....

If Congress did not want us to secretly interpret the law, then Congress should not have passed a law for us to secretly interpret....

If you, the American people, did not want me to secretly collect your data, then you should not have elected me President. Yes, I know many of you were probably unaware that I wanted to secretly collect your data, especially since I said I would not secretly collect your data. But, I choose to believe that you elected me to be your President, because you believe that if someone has to secretly collect your data, that someone should be me. And, as we all know, my secret interpretations of your support are more important than the reasons you actually supported me.

Finally, while I do not believe there is any reason to debate this issue, I will tell you that I welcome a debate on this issue. In fact, I'm so grateful that Edward Snowden started this debate that I have decided to stop at nothing to ensure he spends the rest of his life in a federal prison.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/2013071...bama.shtml
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply
#2
Nice video ! Funny how this mechanical voice sounds like a politician's stereotyped phrasing pattern... from Junior's "let me tell you something" to Obama's cowboy-like death stares (not death star).
Some people think democracy's point is to elect decision-makers, whereas the all idea was always to put forward a new spokeperson. Next step, we'll vote only to change this or that anchorwoman's hairstyle ? :lol:
Reply
#3
Yeah, that's why they invented 'Big Brother' and 'Survivor' and 'Dancing with the Stars' so they could make people think they really had some control over their lives :pinkelephant:
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply
#4
I wish the whole country could get past the Republican/Democrat mindset (Shallow Politics), look past the elected puppets and focus on the vast unelected government that's really behind all of this. It's the only hope the country has to actually change things.
Reply
#5
George W. Bush retained "Clinton's" George Tenet; Barack H. Obama, Jr., wanted John Brennan as DCI but Brennan was opposed by progressives as pro-waterboarding.

Now Brennan is DCI.

Barack H. Obama, Jr., retained FBI Director Robert Mueller, then extended his term:

Director Mueller was sworn in on August 3, 2011 by Attorney General Eric Holder following legislation to extend by two years his tenure as head of the FBI. In 1976, Congress enacted a law limiting the FBI Director to a single term of no longer than 10 years. In May, President Obama asked Mueller, whose 10-year term was to end in September, to stay on for two more years, and asked Congress to pass corresponding legislation.

In a statement, Attorney General Holder said, "The United States faces ongoing threats from terrorists intent on atacking us both at home and abroad, and it is crucial that the FBI have sustained, strong leadership to confront that threat. There is no better person for that job than Bob Mueller."

The Axis of Evil trumpeted by George H. Bush in 2001 was countermanded by the Council on Foreign Relations paper "Iran: Time for a New Approach" co-authored by Zbigniew Brzezinski and Robert Gates.

The alliance of James Earl Carter's and George H. W. Bush's national security strategists indicates a game played above apparent partisan differences*.

As if in accord with Sibel Edmond's admonition to eschew the partisan level for a deeper investigation.

If not here, where.



*Charles Drago and George Michael Evica, L. Fletcher Prouty, Peter Dale Scott have parted this curtain and bade us enter.

Phil's footnote: As Magda alludes, the Wizards would have us rapt and wrapped up in "reality" and the bloody shirt riot of the Zimmerman-Martin flashbang.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Services Rendered: Russian Federation’s Order of Friendship to go with Obama's Nobel Peace Prize? Magda Hassan 0 4,118 22-12-2016, 04:06 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Michelle Obama IS A MAN!! PROOF!! 2014 Paul Rigby 17 11,995 22-02-2015, 12:53 PM
Last Post: Paul Rigby
  Help Obama Kickstart World War III! Paul Rigby 2 3,010 16-11-2014, 11:33 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Schlafly thinks that President Obama wants Ebola on American soil. Peter Lemkin 1 2,903 06-11-2014, 07:46 PM
Last Post: Dawn Meredith
  Mitt Obama David Guyatt 0 1,842 20-06-2013, 01:27 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Obama's Change (a graphic for the times) Ed Jewett 1 2,799 26-07-2012, 12:01 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Washington Insider: Obama Member of Chicago Gay Man’s Club Magda Hassan 7 10,021 14-11-2011, 05:51 PM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  Cbs 60 minutes interview - was obama high? Magda Hassan 1 2,887 06-08-2011, 03:29 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Hackers falsely claim Obama dead on Fox Twitter feed Bernice Moore 5 3,556 07-07-2011, 02:20 PM
Last Post: Bernice Moore
  The Queen and Obama get drunk in Ireland Magda Hassan 0 3,095 05-06-2011, 01:23 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)