Emergency Help Needed: Re JFK and Vietnam

[Nathaniel Heidenheimer]

Hi im taking three grad classes and taking care of my alledged child so I am so busy and losing my mind-remainder.

One of my classes is on the Cold War from non us and russian perspective. In reality, thought the title makes it sound groovy, the class is far right with a pangloss of superficial multiculturalism... Sort of a Fareed Zakaria magaziny distortion written largely in accord with CIA injunction.

These past two weeks have been a real eyeopener into just how UNBELIVABLY BRAVE NEW WORLD we have fallen even in academic history departments.

If you had to read what I just read about Vietnam in this youthful X-file generation historian named Jeremi Suri you would lose your body hair and write similar posts into the wilderness. It is far far far far far beyond anything that could ever be imagined in the USSR.

He pins the whole thing -- including the basic creation of the DIEM project on JFK!!!!!!! He treats LBJ as a saintly grandfather whose only mission is to spread the NEW DEAL to Vietnam. It is cartoon and I am trying not to go epileptic on Tueday night so I have...


THESE QUESTIONS...

1) CAN SOMONE GIVE ME SOLID NUMBERS OF HOW MANY US TOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL THERE WERE IN VIETNAM ON 11-22-63 HOPEFULLY THE BREAKDOWN . ALSO NUMBERS OF INTEL PEOPLE. ( I REALIZE THERE MAY BE AN OVERLAP) I AM ALMOST CERTAIN THAT OUR SORDID LYING TEXT VASTLY OVERSTATED THESE NUMBERS.

2) CAN SOMEONE GIVE ME GOOD NUMBERS ON THE NUMBER OF DEAD US AND VIETNAMESE KILLED BY 11-22-63.

ALSO PLEASE GIVE THE SOURCES OR AT LEAST PLACES TO LOOK.

The reason is I need some pretty exact figures because the author we were assigned to read blames kindly Uncle LBJ way way way less than JFK even though the numbers are the opposite . Be glad you did not read this book . The problem is it is so widely assigned in colleges right now that hundreds of thousands of kids are gettting brainwashed as I type and type.

I know I could search but I have zero time to spare and have alredy been forced to spend days detouring to refute completely insane attacks on JFK. Also people here might have the numbers and sources off the cuff.

Note: Please FEEL FREE TO TERMINATE THIS THREAD AFTER MISSION WEDENESDAY.

[Jan Klimkowski]

Nathaniel - I can't help much, but I do recall comments of John Judge about his mother, which can be found transcribed from the press conference at the url below. NB I am not the source of any of this information, nor the transcription.:

Mother worked for 25 years in the Personnel Office of the U.S. Army, Deputy Chief of Staff, directly under the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Her job was to project overall national draft figures for five years in advance for the national selective service call, to within one hundred people in accuracy. Before Kennedy's death, she knew from those figures and projections that the Pentagon was planning on troop withdrawal from Vietnam. In late November, she knew Kennedy was pulling out of Vietnam based on her projected figures. I asked her, after she had been retired, when did they tell her that they would escalate in Vietnam? The Pentagon told her in late November of 1963, the Monday following the [JFK] assassination. She couldn't believe the figures. She took them back to the Joint Chiefs of Staff for query—what must have been the first civilian protest of the war. She said, "This couldn't be right." The Joint Chiefs said to "use those figures!" The figures on November 25, 1963, were that the war would last for ten years, and the casualties would be about 57,000, and "to figure that in."

February 1992, American University, Washington, DC. To write to get confirmation on the above claim: Foreign Relations of the U.S. Policy, 1962-63, Vietnam Series; Volume 4, Aug.-Dec. 1963; Security Memorandum of Kennedy's plan. This was also backed up by Arthur Schlesinger. (This short transcript is not guaranteed as to exactitude, although I have viewed the video several times and attempted to transcribe it accurately.)

http://home.pacbell.net/butlerc/Conspira...iracy.html

[Paul Rigby]

THESE QUESTIONS...

1) CAN SOMONE GIVE ME SOLID NUMBERS OF HOW MANY US TOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL THERE WERE IN VIETNAM ON 11-22-63 HOPEFULLY THE BREAKDOWN . ALSO NUMBERS OF INTEL PEOPLE. ( I REALIZE THERE MAY BE AN OVERLAP) I AM ALMOST CERTAIN THAT OUR SORDID LYING TEXT VASTLY OVERSTATED THESE NUMBERS.

2) CAN SOMEONE GIVE ME GOOD NUMBERS ON THE NUMBER OF DEAD US AND VIETNAMESE KILLED BY 11-22-63.

ALSO PLEASE GIVE THE SOURCES OR AT LEAST PLACES TO LOOK.

CIA numbers in Vietnam as of early October 1963:

Richard Starnes, “’Arrogant’ CIA Disobeys Orders in Viet Nam,” The Washington Daily News, 2 October 1963, p2: “Few people other than Mr. Richardson and his close aides know the actual CIA strength here, but a widely used figure is 600. Many are clandestine agents known only to a few of their fellow spooks.”

John Prados. Lost Crusader: The Secret Wars of CIA Director William Colby (Oxford UP, March 2003) [019528478], p.186: Agency strength in Saigon peaked at 700.

Starnes’ estimate challenged by AP’s Malcolm Brown, “U.S. Intelligence Role Is Diverse in South Vietnam,” New York Times, Tuesday, 8 October 1963, p.21:“Mr. Richardson and the 200 or so agents under his command…”

Brown achieved this reduced figure, in part, by sleight of hand:

“The C.I.A. is not the only American agency involved in intelligence in Vietnam. Some of the other groups are the 704th Military Intelligence Detachment, the embassy’s security office, and the aid mission’s Rural Affairs Section, headed by Rufus Phillips, a former C.I.A. agent with experience in the Philippines.”

In fact, Phillips was “ex-“CIA, and the RAS firmly under CIA direction.

For the fullest single account of the CIA’s campaign to overthrow Diem, see:

The Times of Vietnam, Monday, 2 September 1963, pp.1&6

CIA Financing Planned Coup D’Etat
Planned for Aug. 28; Falls Flat, Stillborn

Saigon (TVN) – The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency was financing a planned coup d’etat scheduled for last Wednesday, reliable foreign sources said yesterday.

For some weeks as the Xa Loi anti-government campaign grew, the rumours of coup d’etats became more frequent and abundant. It was well known that the Communists were exploiting the Xa Loi campaign in an effort to topple the Vietnamese Government, and there were constant rumours that C.I.A. was also supporting it.

Now as the story comes out, it is revealed that C.I.A. agents in the political section of the U.S. Embassy, the Public Safety Division of U.S.O.M. and the G2 section of M.A.A.G., with the assistance of well-paid military attaches from three other embassies, had prepared a detailed plan for the overthrow of the Vietnamese Government. The C.I.A. plan, it is said, had the blessing of high officials in the “distressed” State Department.

It is also said Vietnamese authorities seem to be well aware of C.I.A. efforts to help build the political agitation of the “Buddhist Affair” to a point of popular confusion and hysteria which would be fertile ground for the planned coup d’etat of the unofficially official American organization.

Beginning in January of this year, it is reported American secret agency “experts” who successfully engineered the coup d’etats in Turkey, Guatemala, Korea, and failed in Iran and Cuba, began arriving in Vietnam, taking up duties mostly in the U.S. Embassy, U.S.O.M., M.A.A.G., and various official and unofficial installations here. The Vietnamese Government, though seemingly well aware of all this, apparently could not believe such action was possible from allies and at a time with victory so near.

Rumours of their activities with student and religious and other private groups and clubs have long flown around the city. During the period in which U.S. Ambassador Nolting was on leave from May to July, the operators became more openly active, showing themselves in person at Xa Loi Pagoda to confer with agitators there.

But, certain foreign sources say, the young agent provocateurs showed their hands too brazenly in the attempt to prepare the military coup d’etat and revealed the plot. Naively believing the subjects of their bribes were anti-government, they poured money into the pockets of many, the sources say. The money is now spent from a budget which the U.S. Congress has no authority to audit, an affair which may bring much trouble and shame when the U.S. Congress takes a close look. The sources estimate the sum of money spent to overthrow the Vietnamese Government was between 10 and 21 million dollars.

The money was in three banks, it is reported: Bank of America, Hong-Kong-Shanghai Banking Corp., and Bank of Tokyo.
U.S. banknotes under 50 dollar denominations were difficult to change on the black market on Saturday, and black market dealers who accepted small notes gives as much as 4 ps. per dollar less than the going rate of 1065 VN for bills of 50 and 100 dollar denominations.

By Sunday afternoon some black market currency dealers were refusing to buy dollars but were selling them at 1058 VN to the dollar.

The macabre outline of the plot in seven steps bears a sinister resemblance to the Communist tactics:

1) Create unrest and discontent among the masses, provoking “religious”-inspired anti-government sentiment; sow discord among the population.
2) Mobilize youth groups (a function of the C.I.A. agents in U.S.I.S. and U.S.O.M.) particularly the following groups: Boy Scout, Girl Scouts, Buddhist Youth, Buddhist student groups.
3) Buy police, army, labor, and civil servants with three months advance salary and a bonus.
4) Assure government officials that they will be allowed to stay in their present posts if they agree to resign when given the signal.
5) While agitating in the different groups, provoke the government at the same time to commit mistakes such as killing innocent civilians or imprisoning large numbers of particular interest groups such as the youth.
6) When confusion has reached its peak, make sure “representatives” of so-called “representative groups” – e.g., civil servants, army, etc; - present an ultimatum to the President to (a) resign or (b) to send his family into exile.
7) If President resigns, a puppet government must be ready to take over – or a “military junta” prepared to take the reigns of government until elections can be held.

The 24 million dollar “budget” was earmarked, according to the same sources, as follows:

1) Advance salaries for the army, police and civil servants
2) Bonus for the same
3) Further gratifications for the same if necessary
4) Financing of the “Buddhist” organizations
5) Financing of youth movements such as the “Voluntary Youths” (whose financing to date is reported to have come from “American sources”.
6) Propaganda – including payment for “articles” by foreign correspondents in Vietnam
7) Relief – assumed to mean a contingency fund for miscellaneous or unforeseen expenditures

The plan, it is said, was to install a puppet military junta before elections (formerly scheduled for the 31st of August but postponed after martial law was declared). The various and sundry politicians in exile were to be returned to Vietnam to form several political parties and prepare for elections. Nguyen Ton Hoan, at a press conference in New York last week, announced he had a government ready to bring to Vietnam. He is reported to have presented the list to Secretary of State Dean Rusk. Pham Huy Co of November 11 fame is reported also to be in the U.S. ready to cash in a change of governments.

But, Nguyen Ton Hoan’s list – according to several persons on the list – contains (end of page 1) the names of persons who have never even been consulted to give approval for their inscription on the list.

Some weeks ago the Radio Catinat rumor indicated the coup was to come between the 15th and 28th of this month. The Government and Army took action on August 21, but this plan continued, the sources say. The date scheduled for the coup was actually August 28, they report.

On August 29 a military intelligence source was quoted in a foreign wire service dispatch as reporting that President Diem would be stopping in Manila on that day – the 29th – en route to exile in a friendly country. Manila journalists were alerted to be at International Airport to see him on the stopover. Meanwhile President Ngo Dinh Diem was visiting marines on the Saigon River. Apparently the source was not alerted to the actual turn of events, or he leaked the “news” prematurely.

U.S. Ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge had been due to arrive on August 26. There were unconfirmed reports that the date was postponed to August 29. But, immediately after the August 21 action of President Ngo Dinh Diem and the Army, Lodge received orders to come immediately, arriving in Saigon on August 22.

Certain diplomatic sources in Saigon report that essentially the whole diplomatic corps was aware of the plan in general, if not in detail. All were alerted for the hour of 11pm on August 28, they report. But, at the last moment, it was postponed because the Vietnamese knew about it and were organised to face it and to resist to the end – even if it meant fighting in the streets of Saigon.

A number of foreign embassy representatives have expressed great concern, the foreign sources say, because they knew a coup attempt would result in bloody chaos in Saigon.

President De Gaulle was reported to have been indignant, because he knew the Vietnamese would never give in to such a coup easily and it could only create a situation which would profit the Communists.

But it seemed it was only when the CIA agents saw for themselves that the Tu Vu Thanh (Self-Defense Corps of the capital) of the Cong Hoa Youth – street combat specialists – were really organized to face the coup of the day, that they finally postponed their “coup”. They were well aware, whether they reported it to Washington or not, that in the elections of 57 strategic quarters of the capital, the Republican Youth had victories in 54 of the 57 quarters.

The new Ambassador has made no public declarations since his arrival, but has conferred with President Ngo Dinh Diem and with Counsellor Ngo Dinh Nhu. The Ambassador is faced with a most explosive and delicate situation, which some observers believe may turn out to have been as big a debacle as the Cuban affair. The State Department, they judge, has cut the rug from under Lodge’s feet by speaking so precipitously to “deplore” the Vietnamese Government for action which has proven to have been an extremely wise move. If State Dept. had maintained silence until Lodge had time to send away the agent provocateurs among his personnel here and “fix things up” with the Vietnamese Government before the State Department took an open public position on the actions of August 21, it could have saved much face for itself.

But apparently the CIA operators had so greatly misjudged the popularity and strength of the Ngo Dinh Diem Government that Washington was convinced there was going to be a change of government here.

In the meantime, the U.S. public – through foreign press reports based on U.S. “intelligence” assessments, was readied to accept the planned term of events. Ambassador Nolting’s and General Harkins’ statements of optimism and support have for some months been discredited and toned down by the U.S. press here, often with quotes from junior officers who disagreed with their chiefs.

The CIA crowd has obviously prepared well to undercut any sound Lodge policy which develop as they undercut that of Nolting.

Since the monstrous flub – realising at last that they do not have the Vietnamese people with them – the agitation and plotting continues all the same, both foreign and Vietnamese sources say.

In an effort to revive the “religious” character of the crisis, there is now a reported plan underfoot to murder the Thich Thien Hoa newly appointed head of the Buddhist group; Cao Hoal Sang of the Cao Dai sect; and several leaders of the Hoa Hao sects. Next step would be the assassination of Monsigneur Ngo Dinh Thuc himself which the plotters would term a “reprisal” of non-Catholic patriots.

The Archbishop is indeed feared for his well-known fearlessness and dynamism.

As for Counsellor and Madame Ngo Dinh Nhu, the plotters want only exile for them for the time being, because they know well that if they were murdered it would provoke a bloodbath of reprisals.

A threatening side-issue in the pumped-up “religious” affair is reported to be a campaign to encourage the Highlanders – trained by U.S. Special Forces – to desert the national cause. “Intelligence” sources have for some time been telling the press that “Who controls the Highlands, controls Vietnam.”

The CIA group which is reported to have complete control of U.S.I.S., is said to have gone “underground” and to be clandestinely calling on the Armed Forces of the Republic to demonstrate and to provoke the several-times postponed coup d’etat.

As late as Saturday evening, AFRS radio station was broadcasting 30 second spot lectures on such subjects as “majority rule” and explaining in a sarcastic tone that majority rule meant “respect” for the activities of “minorities”.

On Sunday, one agent said angrily “Nhu won the first round. But just wait for the second round.”

Said one Vietnamese government official – “The U.S. press summaries get to Xa Lol two days earlier than I could get them. I can only think of one source for their information.”

As things appear, the plotters momentarily seem to have abandoned the idea of a coup d’etat, but still cling to the purpose of creating unrest under whatever label they can ????, counting on diplomatic immunity to go on untouched in their activities to topple the Government.

The State Department, now faced with an embarrassing dilemma created by gross errors of assessment of the situation here, has the choice of doing an about face or losing plenty of face – and maybe both.

The millions of Americans who believe in the freedom and national integrity their government preaches are in for a big disillusionment if their government does not soon denounce the sinister cynics who almost turned Vietnam over to the Communists. And some observers on the scene are wondering whether the whole fiasco is a desperate effort of those who helped to lose Cuba for the Free World to try to recoup their loss of face by taking control of Vietnam in time to proclaim her victory as their own.

But this is not the American way, as American citizens have been brought up to understand it. And, once revealed, the American people will without any doubt turn their wrath for this fiasco on those who have betrayed their ideals.

The U.S. Congress – watchdog of the American dream – is still there. And they are not likely to accept lightly the betrayals of all the ideals of which they are the guardians – among the most precious of which is self-determination of peoples in freedom.

There is one more factor in Vietnam’s favor. U.S. Congressmen are also political realists, and it won’t take long for most of them to see the realities of the situation in Vietnam once the facts are placed before them.

Why did the CIA want to overthrow Diem?

He and Nhu were, supported by Kennedy, negotiating a peace deal with Hanoi:

Wilfred G. Burchett. The Furtive War: The United States in Vietnam and Laos (NY: International Publishers, 1963), p. 216: April 1963, Kennedy was “making soundings – either directly or through British, French, Indian and other channels - for the kind of diplomatic formula” under which withdrawal could be negotiated. The favoured solution was inevitably based on the Laotian model.

Robert Kennedy told Daniel Ellsberg much the same thing. See Jan Wenner, “Dan Ellsberg: The Rolling Stone interview, part 11,” Rolling Stone, 6 December 1972, p. 23: “He said, his brother would have arranged ‘a Laotian-type solution, some form of coalition government with people who would ask us to leave…”

[Jan Klimkowski]

Paul - a fascinating piece of history. Thanks.

Do you know if De Gaulle's repudiation of NATO was in part due to his disgust at the geopolitical games being played in South-East Asia?

[Peter Lemkin]

...But, they had a lot to do with the assassination attempts on him.....(along with a few other things.....)

Which reminds me, I'm quite sure [at the minimum] the Russian, French, Israeli, and UK secret services - along with the American - know EXACTLY who/how/why Dallas. And I think the French are the only ones likely to tell what they know anytime soon.

[Paul Rigby]

[quote=Nathaniel Heidenheimer]
THESE QUESTIONS...

1) CAN SOMONE GIVE ME SOLID NUMBERS OF HOW MANY US TOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL THERE WERE IN VIETNAM ON 11-22-63 HOPEFULLY THE BREAKDOWN . ALSO NUMBERS OF INTEL PEOPLE. ( I REALIZE THERE MAY BE AN OVERLAP) I AM ALMOST CERTAIN THAT OUR SORDID LYING TEXT VASTLY OVERSTATED THESE NUMBERS.

2) CAN SOMEONE GIVE ME GOOD NUMBERS ON THE NUMBER OF DEAD US AND VIETNAMESE KILLED BY 11-22-63.

ALSO PLEASE GIVE THE SOURCES OR AT LEAST PLACES TO LOOK.

How many US “advisers” in Vietnam in late 1963?

Richard Starnes, “It’s A Dirty War,” New York World-Telegram & Sun, 3 October 1963, p.25: “Second, and this may be the biggest point of all, no one has any assurance that 16,000 Americans now in Viet Nam, mostly military, are going to be enough…”

U.S. fatalities as of January 1964:

Richard Starnes, “Enduring the Dead,” The Washington Daily New, 16 January 1964, p.29: “All that is needed is to think of them as numbers, see? Not names, or individuals or people, but simply as numbers. The 167 becomes a statistic that is easy to swallow and, more important, easy to keep down. Twelve lines printed on yellow teletype paper tell me (and whatever other handful may be interested) that the 166th and 167th American fatalities have been chalked up as a consequence of the shabby little twilight war we are losing in Viet Nam.

[Jan Klimkowski]

...But, they had a lot to do with the assassination attempts on him.....(along with a few other things.....)

Indeed. See the thread at the url below:

http://www.deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/...ght=gaulle

[Paul Rigby]

THESE QUESTIONS...

1) CAN SOMONE GIVE ME SOLID NUMBERS OF HOW MANY US TOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL THERE WERE IN VIETNAM ON 11-22-63 HOPEFULLY THE BREAKDOWN . ALSO NUMBERS OF INTEL PEOPLE. ( I REALIZE THERE MAY BE AN OVERLAP) I AM ALMOST CERTAIN THAT OUR SORDID LYING TEXT VASTLY OVERSTATED THESE NUMBERS.

2) CAN SOMEONE GIVE ME GOOD NUMBERS ON THE NUMBER OF DEAD US AND VIETNAMESE KILLED BY 11-22-63.

ALSO PLEASE GIVE THE SOURCES OR AT LEAST PLACES TO LOOK.

Also of interest and relevance:

Vietnamese casualties pre-Kennedy:

Democratic Republic of Vietnam Commission for Investigation of the US Imperialists’ War Crimes in Vietnam, “Chronology of the Vietnam War: Book One, 1941-1966,” (Paris: Association D’Amite Franco Vietnamienne, 1968), p.44: “From late 1954 to late 1960, according to incomplete statistics, the Ngo Dinh Diem Administration jailed and tortured 527,000 people, and killed another 77,500.”

Kennedy inherits police state in Saigon:

Jim G. Lucas, “Independence Brings Lurking Fear to Saigon,” New York World-Telegram & Sun, 5 December 1959, p.3: “This is a city in which the secret police are active – ‘worse than under the French,’ many will tell you.”

Pre-Kennedy inauguration (Jan 1961) coup and assassination attempts against Diem:

In late February 1957, an “armored car regiment stationed at Go Vap, six miles from Saigon stood paused to roll on the capital, when the plot was disclosed by a sergeant” (1). Days later, that perennial spook favourite, an angry “young student,” shot at Diem in the village of Ban Me Thuot (2). It is probable that these attempts were organised outside the aegis of the Agency’s Saigon station, most likely by the Agency-within-an-Agency that was the counter-intelligence (and much else besides) section of James Angleton. According to two veteran, and notably well-informed China Lobby propagandists, writing in 1965 in response to the CIA’s failure to strike north from Vietnam, successive Saigon station chiefs remained close and loyal to Diem and his brother until 1960 (3). Interestingly, 1959 was the year William Colby moved from deputy chief of Saigon station to the top job. Colby had been a staunch supporter of the CIA’s campaign to out Souvanna and reinstate Phoumi Nosavan in Vientiane in 1959 (4). Later in the same year, General Williams, the head of the US military contingent in Saigon, and “one of the staunch protectors of the Diem regime,” was also recalled (5).

With Diem stripped of US spook and military protectors, and within days of Kennedy’s election as 35th President, CIA orchestrated a parachutists’ revolt in Saigon (6). The South Vietnamese government first disseminated (7), then, under intense pressure from Washington, retracted (8), charges of US responsibility, reportedly with assistance from British and French spooks and military attaches (9). In early July 1963, in secret session at the trial of the captured Vietnamese political leadership of the attempted coup, Saigon named the two senior CIA men in charge of the November 1960 coup: George Carver and Howard Elting (10). The former served under the light cover of an employee of the United States Operations Mission (USOM), while Elting was the deputy chief of the American mission (11).

The failure of the November putsch saw recourse by the CIA to the tried and trusted strategy of the pseudo-gang. The CIA already had a massive programme in motion – it was to become known as the National Liberation Front. It had debuted in March 1960 with a broadcast, ostensibly on a clandestine Viet Cong radio station operating in South Vietnam, of the Proclamation of Former Resistance Fighters. In fact the radio station was a CIA “black radio” op, and the Former Resistance Fighters, the Agency. Hanoi radio immediately denounced it as a trap (12), but later felt obliged to intervene in an attempt to bring the position in the south under some form of political control and direction. This strategy was to issue in the formation of the National Liberation Front. At the time of Diem’s murder, “a probable majority of the NLF’s adherents were members” of two bitterly anti-communist sects, “the Cao Dai and the Hoa Hao,” both of which were simultaneously harried and bought up by the CIA in the initial campaign to install Diem in 1955 (13). As one America observer commented: “The Cao Dai were subdued more by negotiation and intrigue than by military force” (14).

(1) Hilaire du Berrier. Background to Betrayal: The Tragedy of Vietnam (Western Islands, 1965), p. 167.

(2) Ibid., p. 166. See also: Foster Haley, “South Vietnam Head Escapes as Gunman Fires at Him at Fair,” NYT, 23 February 1957, pp.1&8. For a rare, albeit fleeting, mention of the attempt in “mainstream” US historiography of the period, see Gregory A. Olson. Mansfield and Vietnam: A Study in Rhetorical Adaptation (East Lansing: Michigan State University, 1995), p. 74.

(3) Stephen Pan & Daniel Lyons, S.J. Vietnam Crisis (NY: Twin Circle Publishing, July 1966; this edition, March 1967), p. 105. The CIA itself had earlier suggested that its reassessment of its links with the Diem regime began in April 1963. See David Wise & Thomas B. Ross. The Invisible Government (London: Jonathan Cape, 1965), p. 159n.

(4) Stevenson. The End of Nowhere, pp.62 & 104.

(5) Jean Lacouture. Vietnam: Between Two Truces (London: Secker & Warburg, 1966), p. 118.

(6) According to General Tran Van Don, a CIA man accompanied the rebels. See his Our Endless War Inside Vietnam (Presidio Press, 1978), p. 79.

(7) Saigon Committee Against Rebels,” The Times, 16 November 1960, p. 11; and Renee Grosset, “Les ennuis du President Diem,” Le Figaro, 21 November 1960.

(8) AP, “Saigon Drops Charge/Says Accused Western Allies Were Not Behind Revolt,” The New York Times, 19 November 1960, p. 2.

(9) The Times of Vietnam, 15 November, 1960, cited a high Vietnamese official who charged that the coup makers had been moved to rebellion by “colonial and imperialist hands.” (Robert Scigliano. South Viet Nam: Nation Under Stress (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1964), p. 215, n. 66.) “A leaflet distributed by the government-created People’s Committee Against Communist Rebels was more explicit, claiming that the rebellious officers had ‘gotten the support of a group of American, French and British colonialists and imperialists” (Ibid.). In The Making of a Quagmire (p. 49), David Halberstam, a loyal and well-rewarded creature of the CIA, denied Agency sponsorship of the November 1960 coup. The most senior British intelligence figure to have been involved was almost certainly MI6’s Maurice Oldfield. He was to “punished” for his assistance by relocation to Washington, where he served as chief liaison officer between CIA and his own ostensible employers. For an insight into MI6’s desperate desire to serve the CIA in the region in this period, see Kahin & Kahin, p.124.

(10) Only Carver’s name was furnished by David Halberstam, who described him as “an employee of the American military mission.” (“Vietnam Says U.S. Aided ’60 Revolt,” The New York Times, 6 July 1963, pp.1&3.)

(11) “US Envoy hurries back to Saigon,” The Times, 8 July 1963, p. 8. See also: Ellen J. Hammer. A Death in November: America in Vietnam, 1963 (NY: E.P. Dutton, 1987), p. 154.

(12) Senator Ernest Gruening & Herbert W. Beaser. Vietnam Folly (Washington, D.C.: The National Press, Inc., 1968), p. 186.

(13) George McT. Kahin, “The Pentagon Papers: A Critical Evaluation,” The American Political Science Review, June 1975, (Vol. 69, No. 2), p. 682. One now understands why Hanoi adopted such a seemingly churlish attitude to the NLF post-victory.

(14) Roy Jumper, “Sects and Communism in South Vietnam,” Orbis, Spring 1959, p. 90.

[Paul Rigby]

THESE QUESTIONS...

1) CAN SOMONE GIVE ME SOLID NUMBERS OF HOW MANY US TOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL THERE WERE IN VIETNAM ON 11-22-63 HOPEFULLY THE BREAKDOWN . ALSO NUMBERS OF INTEL PEOPLE. ( I REALIZE THERE MAY BE AN OVERLAP) I AM ALMOST CERTAIN THAT OUR SORDID LYING TEXT VASTLY OVERSTATED THESE NUMBERS.

2) CAN SOMEONE GIVE ME GOOD NUMBERS ON THE NUMBER OF DEAD US AND VIETNAMESE KILLED BY 11-22-63.

ALSO PLEASE GIVE THE SOURCES OR AT LEAST PLACES TO LOOK.

US military strength in Vietnam as of the end of 1965:

Democratic Republic of Vietnam Commission for Investigation of the US Imperialists’ War Crimes in Vietnam “Chronology of the Vietnam War: Book One, 1941-1966,” (Paris: Association D’Amite Franco Vietnamienne, 1968), p.74: “By the end of 1965, the US expeditionary corps had increased to 185,000; 250,000 tons of bombs had been dropped on North Vietnam during the year.”

[Paul Rigby]

THESE QUESTIONS...

1) CAN SOMONE GIVE ME SOLID NUMBERS OF HOW MANY US TOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL THERE WERE IN VIETNAM ON 11-22-63 HOPEFULLY THE BREAKDOWN . ALSO NUMBERS OF INTEL PEOPLE. ( I REALIZE THERE MAY BE AN OVERLAP) I AM ALMOST CERTAIN THAT OUR SORDID LYING TEXT VASTLY OVERSTATED THESE NUMBERS.

2) CAN SOMEONE GIVE ME GOOD NUMBERS ON THE NUMBER OF DEAD US AND VIETNAMESE KILLED BY 11-22-63.

ALSO PLEASE GIVE THE SOURCES OR AT LEAST PLACES TO LOOK.

“Viet Cong” (more accurately, nationalist resistance and CIA-backed anti-Diem sectists & pseudo-gangs, all three of whom were fighting Diem’s army and security apparat) killed in South Vietnam, 1961-63:

Bernard Fall. The Two Viet-Nams: A Political and Military Analysis (London: Pall Mall Press, 1963), p.349: “Official South Vietnamese casualty figures …three years in a row, ‘enemy’ casualty figures were estimated at more than 30,000 killed, while the number of Viet-Cong combatants remains stationary at about 25,000-30,000.”