Posts: 2,429
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Okay, since no one is capable of answering my questions, or may be, perhaps, you'd rather sit back and wait to see what's going to happen next. I have a million dollar question for you.
Before starting off with a question, I'd like to start with a statement, and then end with a question, may I? Here's my statement, if many researchers believe Howard Hunt was somehow involved in some manner, and if a few believe Frank Sturgis was involved somehow, while others even believe Lee Oswald was involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, then how could... now.... Here comes my question, just why was Ed Kaiser stealing from the government, what was he looking for? Why even take that risk, and if the government already knew Kaiser was stealing, why then was he never, ever prosecuted? Better yet, released is one of the CIA documents I'm sure no one was suppose to find, but, under the 1992 JFK ACT it was released, with brackets of course, in fact, the CIA even said it was difficult to determine the release date of those documents, and I'm sure the CIA or the government for that much never thought I'd do a FOIA request or search on my father, my point is, that document states my father was carrying around photos of Hunt and Sturgis, most importantly ["OTHERS"] as well, meaning there were other photographs my father had, but the CIA elected not to identify anyone else now isn't that interesting, I mean, what is there to hide right? So here's the million dollar question, do you suppose Ed Kaiser was also carrying around a photograph of say the "Silent Majority" person, and therefore, he just wanted out?
Oh hmmmm, I suppose my answer would be the same as yours!
Posts: 2,429
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
If in-case you haven't figured it out yet, I have a gift, it's a special gift, some of you may think I'm crazy, perhaps, that's what I want you to think?
Posts: 2,429
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
14-09-2016, 07:16 AM
(This post was last modified: 14-09-2016, 04:12 PM by Scott Kaiser.)
Would anyone care to witness my gift? Mr. Jim D. Would be so kind as to simply answer yes or no to my question, and if you are to answer truthfully, your answer would be yes. Here's the question. Did you ever fear this recording becoming publicly displayed and getting into the wrong hands proving it could harm what has been said about Kennedy?
Yes or no Jim please. Truth is, you've heard this recording a number of times already well before I posted it haven't you, and you know what I'm talking about don't you? But, what's worst is that you know I'm right. Thank you for your honesty Jim.
Posts: 335
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jul 2015
I would like to witness your 'gift', Scott. Please, share it with us.
Posts: 2,429
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Mark A. O'Blazney Wrote:I would like to witness your 'gift', Scott. Please, share it with us.
You may not ever see it coming! ::laughingdog::
Posts: 2,429
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Scott Kaiser Wrote:Scott Kaiser Wrote:Scott Kaiser Wrote:More bullshit, part two....
http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/bayofpigs/baypigs2.mp3
My changes are in (red.)
Robert - Now Jack, the thing of course to remember is this I don't know how much you want to get into it, but the thing to remember on this is this, Ah what you did on that day, Tuesday before Wednesday was something added to the plan.
What Robert is discussing here is delaying the A4s. On Tuesday, April 18, 1961, the plan for the invasion was to cover the B-26's with A4 Skyhawks, but rather than providing "air-cover" as [promised,] Jack, called it off only having them delay their fly by yet still make it appear as those he was still in support of the Brigade, you don't have to take my word for it, just talk to the several survivors of the Bay of Pigs including the pilots of the A4s. Two people can keep a secret if one of them is dead, in this case, Jack is no longer around.
Jack - Yeah, oh yeah.
Jack agrees.
Robert - And not something that was taken away, or within.... a plan that was made in inadequate by some deficiency in ah.... withdrawal of something.
The picture now becomes more clearer when Robert says, and this was not something that was taken away, made inadequate by some deficiency in ah withdrawal of something of the partial bullshit promise, the A4s were promised prior to the BOPs landing, so, that wasn't really taken away, or that the plan was somehow inadequate, the plan was still in place right? Or that it caused a deficiency, you mean a lack of shortage or shortcoming because the Brigade had other planes? Is that what Robert means wow?!? it sure in the hell did! When the A4s didn't arrive when promised, that also didn't help the Brigade in the air-cover needed to take the beach-head. Kennedy backed out, and intelligence knew it, so did the Brigade, this part of the Bay of Pigs has never been disclosed, and they got even.
Jack - Yeah that's right.
Jack agrees again, how about that?
Robert - But you'd added that on Tuesday, it never been planed before, and this plan specifically said that this wouldn't be done.
But! The plan was able to confuse everyone whoever thought there was some time discrepancy when there really wasn't.
Jack - Yeah.
We know Jack.... Thanks!
Robert - It's something you added in order to help.
Yes Jack you added this part of the plan to help keep U.S. involvement out of the invasion, then, on the 18th of April 1961, you would send your memo off to the Russians indicating what a swell guy you were for keeping your promise to the Russians by not invading Cuba, in this case, "air-support" and renege on your promise to the Brigade by not providing "air-cover." As the old cliche goes, what comes around goes around, and as Osvaldo, English for Oswald, whose last name was Coello found in my father's address book said, "We took care of them bastards."
Jack - You heard about ah,
Robert - You know if somebody is going to say something in the senate.
Robert, it's not the senate you should worry about!
Jack - Yeah, you know how they are, make everything look lousy these days. You know Royal Evens said he talked to Dirikson, and Dirkson said, I don't quite get this, he said, by Kenneth? Laughing.
Robert - What?
Jack - Just say, I don't know, I think the Kennedy's are planning something, they're baiting the trap us into this... Laughing, cause they're pretty smart down there.
Gee, I wonder just who got the last laugh?
Robert - If we are, we haven't figured out how to close the trap,
Traps, who's trapping who?
Jack - Yeah, that's right, we haven't quite figured it out. More laughs.
It was just one big joke wasn't boys? Playing with lives like that, just one big joke to ya!
Robert - But, we're learning.
I suppose so Robert! I'm also willing to bet that a few here are too, learning that is... Just when your : : goes off, you may not ever see it coming!
Jack - Just shows you boy what that press is doesn't it?
Robert is now talking about how Jack's ratings in the senate have slightly decreased, but nothing in comparison to Rockefeller.
History is about to change, Watergate and Kennedy's assassination will now be FULLY exposed, and you'll only find this part of history in my update as soon as it becomes available.
The truth would have never come out had it not been for you Robert! The Brigade thanks you, I thank you, and I'm sure my father thanks you too!
​Wouldn't want anyone to miss out reading this, I don't believe anyone has ever presented this conversation in such light before proving Jack delayed the A4s just as Hunt, Frank, and many of the Brigade members said Jack did, gee... Where are all the debaters now? This part of the Bay of Pigs is NOW disclosed for the very first time! Aw, you're welcome! Truth, it can be brutal, it can hurt, but as my girlfriend always says, I'd rather you tell me the truth, then a lie. Honesty.... It really is the best policy isn't it?
Posts: 2,690
Threads: 253
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2013
Scott, is that your transcript? "Royal Evens"? It's pretty obvious that JFK is talking about Rowland Evans. Again, I have to wonder about the extent of your knowledge of that time period, if you don't know who Rowland Evans was.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rowland_Evans
And you seem to be happily saying that JFK got what was coming to him because of the Bay of Pigs.
Posts: 335
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jul 2015
Tracy Riddle Wrote:Scott, is that your transcript? "Royal Evens"? It's pretty obvious that JFK is talking about Rowland Evans. Again, I have to wonder about the extent of your knowledge of that time period, if you don't know who Rowland Evans was.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rowland_Evans
And you seem to be happily saying that JFK got what was coming to him because of the Bay of Pigs.
Scott doesn't need to write a book. He's left everything with us here. Please, Scott, can you photocopy your dad's letter, as graphology reveals much. Thank you for your valuable time, señor. Vaya con Dios.
Posts: 2,429
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Scott Kaiser Wrote:Would anyone care to witness my gift? Mr. Jim D. Would be so kind as to simply answer yes or no to my question, and if you are to answer truthfully, your answer would be yes. Here's the question. Did you ever fear this recording becoming publicly displayed and getting into the wrong hands proving it could harm what has been said about Kennedy?
Yes or no Jim please. Truth is, you've heard this recording a number of times already well before I posted it haven't you, and you know what I'm talking about don't you? But, what's worst is that you know I'm right. Thank you for your honesty Jim.
Jim, please, just once, do me the honors....
Mark, the gift is right before you, you're speaking to him. The son of a man whose legacy had never been revealed, now, it has. How would you treat him?
Posts: 2,690
Threads: 253
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2013
Scott Kaiser Wrote:Scott Kaiser Wrote:Would anyone care to witness my gift? Mr. Jim D. Would be so kind as to simply answer yes or no to my question, and if you are to answer truthfully, your answer would be yes. Here's the question. Did you ever fear this recording becoming publicly displayed and getting into the wrong hands proving it could harm what has been said about Kennedy?
Yes or no Jim please. Truth is, you've heard this recording a number of times already well before I posted it haven't you, and you know what I'm talking about don't you? But, what's worst is that you know I'm right. Thank you for your honesty Jim.
Jim, please, just once, do me the honors....
Mark, the gift is right before you, you're speaking to him. The son of a man whose legacy had never been revealed, now, it has. How would you treat him?
You value honesty, Scott?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissist...y_disorder
|
