18-09-2016, 04:50 PM
How would I know when the letter was written if there's no date on it? My father, in his letter says, "I have a son nine years old," I was born in 1964, do the math.
|
On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics
|
|
18-09-2016, 04:50 PM
How would I know when the letter was written if there's no date on it? My father, in his letter says, "I have a son nine years old," I was born in 1964, do the math.
18-09-2016, 05:09 PM
(This post was last modified: 19-09-2016, 04:32 AM by Scott Kaiser.)
You know, now that I think about it, perhaps, this five page letter my father wrote was away for him to leave something behind, information, and he knew it was going to be a matter of time before someone got to him. He did all he could do to protect his family, my mother nor I or my sister knew nothing of what my father wrote in his letter. I did see him sitting at the Dinning room table one evening writing, and he was at the table for quit sometime, every now and then he'd look up at me, and start writing again, no one knew what he was writing about, and when he was finished. He hid the letter in my mother's hope chest where it would stay for the next forty plus years, until I discovered it.
No one knew it was there, and folks like Dawn and Tracy have the ordasity to tell me not to post about my father when ya'll talk about others? I'm sorry to say, but ya'll are messed up big time, you have no idea what you're talking about, and you say you've been "studying" this case for over 25 years? Folks, it doesn't take someone to say they're a student of Watergate or the assassination to learn something. It doesn't take someone whose been in this for awhile to preach the gospel, because the gospel they're preaching just might be their own doctrine, it doesn't take someone to think they know it all to know what happened. All it takes is common sense!
19-09-2016, 06:15 AM
If what ive said and brought to light is not enough then try this on for size, it's in the Liebengood documents you can either do the research yourselves or get my update either way you'll get the iinformation. Kaiser did show Liebengood the photos, after Kaiser's death Liebengood couldn't testify to just seeing them without the evidence why? Because according to Liebengood it would have been "circumstantial evidence," in other words, hearsay on Liebengood's part even though he himself knew they existed, in-fact, it was Liebengood who wanted my father to testify at the HSCA. I suppose after killing my father and his brief case ended up missing there was nothing more my father or Liebengood could do. Now what?
19-09-2016, 06:33 AM
And, Dawn, you and Tracy belive I should start my own blog when folks should hear the truth? Shame on you both.
19-09-2016, 06:46 AM
What's always bugged me is why didn't my father just give those photos to Liebengood? Now I know what's always kept my father from going to prison and my father wasn't about to give up those photos when he could do just about whatever he wanted. Or, why didn't they copy those photos perhaps, because they were black and white photos? I don't know and I have no answer, but it's these questions that have been keeping me up at night.
19-09-2016, 07:13 AM
I think it's time to fully exposed Watergate and Kennedy's assassination don't you? Even God chose David to slew Goliath.
19-09-2016, 01:55 PM
Would you like something more to think about? Just how much time would anyone spend in jail for threathing a goverment official with a gun?
Isn't that asult with a deadly weapon? Well, my father threatened to kill Maurice Ferre. And, boy wouldn't you like to know why? But, here's a better question why did my father even give the arresting officer's an alias name and the only thing that happened to my father was he spent one night, that's (1) night in jail. Now, do you get the picture(s) folks? No pun intended, lol....
19-09-2016, 01:57 PM
Oh, but when I asked Mr Ferre about the incident he doesn't remember.
19-09-2016, 02:32 PM
By the way, did you know that my father also gave Liebengood a [tape] now you're starting to use your common sense. And, from what I understand, under the Liebengood collection, there's a total of eight tapes.
19-09-2016, 02:58 PM
ASSASSINS A Man Without A Country
P. 86 That day my father went off on a drinking binge at Navarro's office with a few of his friends, he got drunk, then walked downstairs to Maurice Ferre's office, kicked the door in, pulled out a .45 and put the gun to Ferre's head. My father told him that if he didn't start getting paid for the work he was doing in training these men he was going to eliminate him. I don't know if Ferre gave my father any money or if they just agreed on something. I know my dad didn't have any money if he was always asking my mother for money to buy his cigarettes. Later that afternoon the police picked him up at a restaurant. Ferre had to of paid him something in order for my father to have ordered some food. When the police arrested him inside the restaurant Ed said, "I don't understand the charges," he was then taken to jail. The gun was registered to Frank Castro. Frank said, "I was victimized by your father so he must have stolen the gun." My father gave the police an alias name when he was booked into jail. The department discovered my father was a felon carrying a gun and just threaten Ferre's life. They felt confident that they would get a conviction and my father would spend sometime in jail. When it came time for my father to go before the judge, his charges were subsequently dropped, and he was released without question. Some folks say that my father had this smirk on his face as he was getting released, knowing that he couldn't be touched. He could've practically killed someone right in-front of the entire police department, and not a single thing would've happened to my father so long as he possessed the information he carried in his attaché briefcase. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|