On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics

[Albert Doyle]

You still need a good editor Scott so you can do more with your material.

[Lauren Johnson]

Cool, I now have my own human pet following me around the clock deleteing everything I post, in an email you ask how will my pet ever learn, good question.

I am MOVING your posts to this thread, not DELETING them.

EDIT: At least I have just now stopped deleting them. From now on, I will move whatever you post to this thread.

[Mark A. O'Blazney]

You still need a good editor Scott so you can do more with your material.

Scott had a "good" editor at Trine Day until "they" tried to insert corroboration of Judy Vary Baker's lies into his book because, after all, 'Me & Lee' is their cash cow. Very sad.

And now there's a BIG Oswald LoveFest happening soon, supposedly all sold out, with so many speakers that each might get one question a piece after their stunning presentations. What a pathetic bunch, gathering together under Baker's umbrella. This should be a real hum-dinger.

[Lauren Johnson]

You still need a good editor Scott so you can do more with your material.

Scott had a "good" editor at Trine Day until "they" tried to insert corroboration of Judy Vary Baker's lies into his book because, after all, 'Me & Lee' is their cash cow. Very sad.

And now there's a BIG Oswald LoveFest happening soon, supposedly all sold out, with so many speakers that each might get one question a piece after their stunning presentations. What a pathetic bunch, gathering together under Baker's umbrella. This should be a real hum-dinger.

Taking away authorship is just one of the worst things an editor can do. Normal editors in trade publications are very concerned about making the book more readable without inserting their own opinions. If true, that just really sucks.

[Scott Kaiser]

You still need a good editor Scott so you can do more with your material.

Scott had a "good" editor at Trine Day until "they" tried to insert corroboration of Judy Vary Baker's lies into his book because, after all, 'Me & Lee' is their cash cow. Very sad.

And now there's a BIG Oswald LoveFest happening soon, supposedly all sold out, with so many speakers that each might get one question a piece after their stunning presentations. What a pathetic bunch, gathering together under Baker's umbrella. This should be a real hum-dinger.

Taking away authorship is just one of the worst things an editor can do. Normal editors in trade publications are very concerned about making the book more readable without inserting their own opinions. If true, that just really sucks.

I first met JVB over the internet years ago, she told me her whole story about her and Oswald having a love afair, she also said she was an editor and would help me with my book. I believed her, and I did get a lot of that in the beginning people just offering their services, that was a bit strange to me unless it was to see what I wrote. I felt the best thing for me to do was leave a lot of information out. I've never gone through this before, so I didn't know what to expect. She went through my first book and posted a little note at the top of my PDF indicating she went through the whole book making "corrections" not "changes" she then said that she would like to introduce me to Kris, Kris then had some other editor work on it for a little while until I found out he had quit working for Kris, Kris then said he had taken over as the editor of the book that took a few more years before publishing, and not only was there material plugged in, but there was material that was taken out. I didn't know about the material taken out until I looked over the published book because I trusted Kris, when the book was already published I confronted him asking him why did he remove such and such material from the book, he replied, I didn't think it belonged in there without enough evidence.

This is why I now provide a lot of evidence in my update which took years for me to establish. Although, I may not have had enough evidence in my first book, I knew what I was saying was correct, I just couldn't prove it like Me & Lee, I suppose, now, things are different.

[Albert Doyle]

Which only emphasizes the problem. What you are outlining there is exactly what I am saying. I think you might have English as a first language issues. Your writing style only makes your information problem worse.


You need to regroup your case with a better editor and find a way to get your arguments and material out more effectively.

[Scott Kaiser]

Which only emphasizes the problem. What you are outlining there is exactly what I am saying. I think you might have English as a first language issues. Your writing style only makes your information problem worse.


You need to regroup your case with a better editor and find a way to get your arguments and material out more effectively.

My first language is English however because I was raised around the Cuban people I have learned to speak a few languages which may be the reason why my English may be broken however I do not believe that my story gets lost in its translation I am not trying to argue my case but rather prove my case such as who the 6th Watergate burglar was this information is now released for the very first time also the release of Bosch and how Orlando Bosch was released, the assassination threats on President Nixon and many many other events that were never made public I'm certain that if I did not do a fine enough job improperly releasing this information there are those that must have understood what I said my update is under review with a separate publisher all together.

[Scott Kaiser]

And, for the record, could one of the monitors change the title from "On Edward Kaiser" to "On Edwin Kaiser"? Thanks.

[Scott Kaiser]

Edward or Eduardo was Hunt.

[Lauren Johnson]

And, for the record, could one of the monitors change the title from "On Edward Kaiser" to "On Edwin Kaiser"? Thanks.

Done.