On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics

[LR Trotter]

https://youtu.be/G41V48C-N14

Our elected US President was murdered in cold blood, and that is not one damned bit humorous. Not at all!

The decision by the Mods was that Scott spent a lot of time trolling other threads but was also capable to contribute. The decision was to put up with his bullshit. I would have voted him off the island if we had voted.

Mr. Trotter, my counsel is to ask Scott specific questions concerning his area of knowledge or just stay out of this thread.

I agree it's not funny -- not at all. But Scott can troll all he wants in this thread. And in theory he's all about researching and honoring his father.

Cheers.

With all due respect Mr or Ms Johnson, I am sure your counsel is well intended, but "his area of knowledge" may or may not be correct. As JFK's election, the Bay of Pigs Invasion, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the murder in Dallas of JFK, all appear to be things he read and/or heard about, those are events and/or situations I remember as they occurred. But, that by all means is not an indication of expertise on my part. And, to "just stay out of this thread" was what I was trying to do. However, due to moderation of Mr Kaiser's posts, his quoting a post I made on another thread has moved to this thread, bringing my name. An irony, is the quote was his reference correction of my grammar. A posted quote, by the way, I had refrained from responding to. And so it goes, on 11/05/2016.

[Dawn Meredith]

https://youtu.be/G41V48C-N14

Our elected US President was murdered in cold blood, and that is not one damned bit humorous. Not at all!

I agree and I have often thought SK believes JFK deserved what he got, so this just MAY be funny to SK.

[LR Trotter]

https://youtu.be/G41V48C-N14

Our elected US President was murdered in cold blood, and that is not one damned bit humorous. Not at all!

I agree and I have often thought SK believes JFK deserved what he got, so this just MAY be funny to SK.

​I hope you are wrong, Ms Meredith. Unfortunately, some do feel that way.

[Scott Kaiser]

https://youtu.be/G41V48C-N14

Our elected US President was murdered in cold blood, and that is not one damned bit humorous. Not at all!

I agree and I have often thought SK believes JFK deserved what he got, so this just MAY be funny to SK.

What I beleive doesn't matter, I told Luis and Frank I didn't agree with what happened to the Cuban airliner in 1976, yes, I did tell Castro not Fidel that what happened I did not agree with it.

I do not agree with what happened to Jack, although many of them secrectly do believe Jack got what he deserved, I don't, and I'm not them.

Onething everyone seems to be overlooking, and that is, I couldn't say it anymore plainly. When my father first got involved in doing what he did, he believed that he could make a difference towards communism in Cuba, this is what he was fighting for.

Here's what you're missing:

When he later discovered he was working among those who wanted Jack dead, and [after] his discovery, he turned on the anti-Castro community. He also quit CU.

The information I'm giving you in this post you may not fully understand, but I assure you, there's more information in this post then I can explain.

[Scott Kaiser]

^Edited.

[Scott Kaiser]

After this person turned on Frank Sturigs, other members of the same group thought it was important to find out who it was that was trying to discredit Frank, why? Because, those who were trying to discredit Frank also believed he was discrediting the anti-Castro community, and that was a no, no. They just didn't know who it was at that time, perhaps, you should read the Liebengood papers a little closer?

No one knew who it was, but, they later found out after he did something very stupid, that is, he was showing off what he discovered around Miami.

I encourage everyone not to get my first book, it lacks a lot of information that my second, when it becomes available, covers.

[Scott Kaiser]

https://youtu.be/G41V48C-N14

Our elected US President was murdered in cold blood, and that is not one damned bit humorous. Not at all!

The decision by the Mods was that Scott spent a lot of time trolling other threads but was also capable to contribute. The decision was to put up with his bullshit. I would have voted him off the island if we had voted.

Mr. Trotter, my counsel is to ask Scott specific questions concerning his area of knowledge or just stay out of this thread.

I agree it's not funny -- not at all. But Scott can troll all he wants in this thread. And in theory he's all about researching and honoring his father.

Cheers.

With all due respect Mr or Ms Johnson, I am sure your counsel is well intended, but "his area of knowledge" may or may not be correct. As JFK's election, the Bay of Pigs Invasion, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the murder in Dallas of JFK, all appear to be things he read and/or heard about, those are events and/or situations I remember as they occurred. But, that by all means is not an indication of expertise on my part. And, to "just stay out of this thread" was what I was trying to do. However, due to moderation of Mr Kaiser's posts, his quoting a post I made on another thread has moved to this thread, bringing my name. An irony, is the quote was his reference correction of my grammar. A posted quote, by the way, I had refrained from responding to. And so it goes, on 11/05/2016.

You're right Mr. Trotter, I have no bonafides, I'm just making all this stuff up as I go along because I heard about all these events, in-fact, I don't even know who this Frank Sturgis guy is, you got me!

[Scott Kaiser]

If I could have just one wish, I'd wish this thread would go away.

[Scott Kaiser]

Albert Doyle
Member

Join DateSep 2010Posts4,700

The opposition is being allowed to lie and deny in public that Frazier's ear is visible in Darnell. Anyone can look at Darnell and see the clear division between Frazier's hair and his skin on his head. There's an undeniable skin slot on Frazier's image in Darnell for his ear as delineated by his skin/hair border. When the opposition is cornered by this argument it lies and says the ear is too small. Rubbish, anyone can see it.

If we go to Oswald's mugshot, we can see that he has a very prominent ear that would have to show similarly as Frazier's did. However we don't see that in Darnell. We see a dark mass of hair where both Oswald and Frazier would have an ear showing. The fact Frazier's ear shows up plainly in Darnell proves Darnell's equipment was capable of capturing this. So it then becomes obvious that it should have captured Oswald's ear too, if Oswald was Prayer Man.

The opposition's inability to answer this easy to see evidence should tell you all you need to know. If I had one wish it would be that people would answer good evidence like their Deep Political ethic requires.

The opposition is being allowed to lie and deny in public that Frazier's ear is visible in Darnell.

You can't be f***ing serious? Really?

If anyone here thinks my posts is [trolling] well, then, it's getting tougher and tougher for some of you to live in reality when living a fantasy is much simpler to live.

People will be wondering why I'm saying what I'm saying without reading the previous information, don't want to confuse anyone. lol....

[Scott Kaiser]

The opposition is being allowed to lie

Lets just re-count what we've posted thus far, all my posts are truthful and can be corroborated.

You're still hung up on some prayer man or prayer woman, and for all you know it could be a transvestite!