On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics

[Scott Kaiser]

It has been brought to my attention I should also add the John Birch Society, please be sure to carefully read each suspect including the recently posted ones for a complete updated list.

38. John Birch Society


The list is growing, I'm so excited!

[Scott Kaiser]

39. Billy Sol Estes
40. Malcolm Wallace

This is a pivotal moment!

[Scott Kaiser]

I could try and find the time to respond properly to your post Peter, why must you think I'm out to hurt the forum or something about my father? Perhaps, I just needed to prove to myself that people who call themselves researchers can't figure out what I've already freely given them.

Pete, you say; "I think your 'question' was just an excuse for you to state some theory on your part"

Can you please tell me if I've ever in the six years here posted a theory? And, now you believe I have a theory to share? And, it's through this posts? Sadly, you cannot see the information I've freely given you, you are blinded by whatever it is that's holding you back, and I'm truly sorry!

I believe your biggest problem is thinking? May be?

[Scott Kaiser]

There is over 200 books written on just this one topic, [killing Kennedy,] throughout each staging of his trip to Dallas has been examined thoroughly, as well as each aspect from arriving to Texas to the autospies, and everything in between. Has anyone ever been able to present a clear testimony regarding any agency as to who, how and why?

We know that so many folks have admitted to something or another, it's like any unstable person admitting to a murder, when they're really innocent of the crime. I always find it most interesting when any agency doesn't disclose everything, but they give us enough information to wet our appetite. I especially find the information even more interesting when it's backed by two, three even four people telling me the same thing but at different times, it's as if there is something really going on here, something that no one has taken the time to connect.

Why?

What do I mean? Well, for example, let's take William Kelly, I do believe he is the first researcher who discovered a guy by the name of Luis Castillo while researching the case, Peter Dale Scott, discovered that this Casillo guy was also Eddie Bayo's brother-in-law, they both learned that these two men were introduced to John Martino and they all worked for William Pawley, it gets more interesting. I never heard of Luis Castillo, and no one ever told me about him, but there is a Louis and a phone number listed in my (father's address book,) a few years went by, I've still not heard of Castillo. I knew who the others were, you know, Martino, Bayo & Pawley, and most importantly, my father had William Pawley's name, number and address in his address book, not once, but twice, now that's interesting!

Now we get into how did I learn about Castillo and who he was, well, that's pretty easy, I emailed the MDPL (Miami Dade Public Library) Dear Sirs, I have discovered the following name and number in my father's address book, Louis (305) 374-2208, this number may be circa 1962-63. Please advise as to who owned this number, and if there is any historical value, thanking you in advance, Scott Kaiser. Their response to me was; Dear Mr. Kaiser; Thank you for your question: The number 305.374.2208 exists. We looked in the 1962-63 R.L. Polk Miami Beach City Directory and found the following name: [Luis Castillo.]

I then later learned that Luis said there were (14) men in Dallas in buildings where he took photographs of individuals and buildings, I later discovered a CIA report that said (14) men were safely exfiltrated on 11/22/1963. This document was a recap of exercises between November 21-30, nowhere does it discuss Kennedy's assassination in November, but it does discuss the plot to kill Kennedy in Miami not Dallas, however, the recaps were specifically discussing the dates of November 21-30, there is no discussion recap of November 16th the day he visited Miami.

I thought to myself, well, that's interesting, perhaps, it's just an oversight on the CIA. Then, the CIA discusses all the photographs they confiscated, it's got to be just another coincidence, because my father stole some photos from the CIA just before Watergate broke, and then he, (my father) was invited to participate in Watergate, wow I thought to myself, this shit has got to be just another coincidence.

But, then my father did something I thought he'd never do, and that was he started showing those photos around in Miami to people he himself thought was involved in the JFK hit, and so the first person my father contacts was Richard Poyle, the same guy who's name is mentioned on the very same CIA document that says (14) men were involved, but what really struck me was that Poyle visited Mexico not once but twice while living in Cuba, he went to Mexico in October 1963, and low and behold he's in Mexico the day before Kennedy is assassinated, and guess what? Poyle says he was arrested in 1966 for trying to illegally leave Cuba, the same month and year Cuesta was arrested, Cuba's government says Poyle was arrested for "crimes against the state" and not illegally trying to leave. Crimes against the State usually means a plot to assassinate Castro. But! Poyle also visited Mexico twice in 1963 and not once is he arrested? I wonder, was it all apart of an elaborate plan to blame Fidel Castro to invade Cuba?

The story doesn't stop there, Poyle then shares a cell with Tony Cuesta, and my father is working with Eugenio's father to break these guy's out of prison in Cuba, whose Eugenio you ask? Well, he's one of the guys who went to Cuba with Tony Cuesta in 1966 to assassinate Fidel Castro, and they got caught. Oh, I have a lot more, a lot, but I think I'll stop here because it sounds like this story is nothing more than one huge coincidence right? Wrong! I believe in coincidences, the problem is, this is not all a coincidence, unfortunately, everything described in this story did happen, therefore, making it a real story.

Someone, not going to mention any names sent me a PM said, your story sounds like James Files and JVB. Well, I don't want to get caught up in folks believing I'm making stuff up, so I'll just say, could it be really nothing more than a coincidence? Each occurrence, each event? Pretty hard to imagine.

Could this information prove I'm certainly wrong in thinking any of it had to do with the assassination of president John F, Kennedy?

No one has to believe me, not any publisher, radio or TV guy. Not any actor, producer or news reporter, not even you because "it's not about me." It's about the one who cannot be denied his rightful place in history, and he did what he had to do. That's what it's about for me!

For those who have not seen what I'm talking about I'll post one page for you!

Did you also know that many of the Cubans were planning on holding a vote on November 24, 1963 for who would be the next president of Cuba, but as we know, LBJ elected not to invade Cuba.

Did you know "that guy" hint, hint, I know how much some of you hate me repeating his badass name also had in his possession a list of leaders who would be president, vice president, governor and so on in Cuba drawn up in Frank Sturgis' own handwriting, and this was POST Kennedy?

This is the real extreme no one knows about!

[Scott Kaiser]

You see Pete, next time before you go on a rampage and attack, stop & breathe, ask yourself why is Scott posting this, don't over analyze. There's always a reason for everything. Have a good day Pete.


Mr. Scott R. Kaiser

[Peter Lemkin]

You see Pete, next time before you go on a rampage and attack, stop & breathe, ask yourself why is Scott posting this, don't over analyze. There's always a reason for everything. Have a good day Pete.
Mr. Scott R. Kaiser

I suggest the next time you ask this question, which you have often asked here in slightly different forms, you instead make your declarative statement, as you just did two posts above. Also, rather than repeating things may I suggest you expand on your evidence for some person or situation, etc. You seem to think that umpteen posts on the same topic will win you more support for you 'take' than more fully developing the one[s] you already have. I don't think so.

[Scott Kaiser]

You see Pete, next time before you go on a rampage and attack, stop & breathe, ask yourself why is Scott posting this, don't over analyze. There's always a reason for everything. Have a good day Pete.
Mr. Scott R. Kaiser

I suggest the next time you ask this question, which you have often asked here in slightly different forms, you instead make your declarative statement, as you just did two posts above. Also, rather than repeating things may I suggest you expand on your evidence for some person or situation, etc. You seem to think that umpteen posts on the same topic will win you more support for you 'take' than more fully developing the one[s] you already have. I don't think so.

Again, you misunderstand me completely. How can an outright nuisance, someone who can be a real jerk, sounds like an asshole and debates everyone win points with anyone? I'm not looking for support from ANYONE, but, if it should happen, I can't help that, let the truth be told I say.

I suggest the next time you ask this question, which you have often asked here in slightly different forms, you instead make your declarative statement, as you just did two posts above.

Why should I ask this question again if I was able to accomplish what was intended this time? You go on to say; "instead make your declarative statement, as you just did two posts above."

Honestly? Because it was more fun! I wonder Pete, besides my none trolls, but nevertheless spies looking to one day use what they can't find against me, I wonder, have they all taken the time to carefully read what was disclosed by two of the GREATEST researchers in this community, William Kelly & Peter Dale Scott?


That was my point.

[Scott Kaiser]

After posting what I posted on Facebook days ago, you know, post #11, someone said, "you solved it Scott" I just replied with a laughing emoji and thought to myself, nah, everyone else did.


No one has to believe me, not any publisher, radio or TV guy. Not any actor, producer or news reporter, it's not about me, it's about the one who cannot be denied his rightful place in history, and he did what he had to do. That's what it's about for me!

I hope by now you do have an even better understanding.

[Mark A. O'Blazney]

After posting what I posted on Facebook days ago, you know, post #11, someone said, "you solved it Scott" I just replied with a laughing emoji and thought to myself, nah, everyone else did.


No one has to believe me, not any publisher, radio or TV guy. Not any actor, producer or news reporter, it's not about me, it's about the one who cannot be denied his rightful place in history, and he did what he had to do. That's what it's about for me!

I hope by now you do have an even better understanding.

Well enough about you, Scott, let's talk about me.

[Scott Kaiser]

After posting what I posted on Facebook days ago, you know, post #11, someone said, "you solved it Scott" I just replied with a laughing emoji and thought to myself, nah, everyone else did.


No one has to believe me, not any publisher, radio or TV guy. Not any actor, producer or news reporter, it's not about me, it's about the one who cannot be denied his rightful place in history, and he did what he had to do. That's what it's about for me!

I hope by now you do have an even better understanding.

Well enough about you, Scott, let's talk about me.

I'm sorry Mark, I was just pointing something out someone said on Facebook that's all, I'm really trying my Best not to make it about me, now, we can always talk about you if you like?

You brought it to my attention a few times asking me to look you up, (I don't remember) if it was to Wikipedia your name or Google you and some woman, I thought to myself, glad to see Mark was able to get a woman. And, I'm pretty sure it was in Dallas right?

If there's anything else we need to know about you please, by all means talk away!

BTW.... Mark, I took the liberty to bold the words which say; "it's not about me" apparently, you'd like it to be?