Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Oswald's Stamp kit displays same stamp as the one on his Reilly paycheck stub - why?
#1
This could be innocent, yet I find it somewhat interesting given all the conversations I am having about Judyth Baker and Reilly Coffee elsewhere...

The stamp kit is from CE115... the letters match perfectly...

Does this mean anything to anyone?


[ATTACH=CONFIG]6123[/ATTACH]


Attached Files
.gif   Oswald-paycheck-stubs-from-Jaeggers-and-Reilly-Coffee-with-Stamp.gif (Size: 411.83 KB / Downloads: 30)
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.....
R. Hunter
Reply
#2
Not sure when this is from... yet it is the identical stamp that is one the May 1963 Reilly Coffee stub....

[ATTACH=CONFIG]6124[/ATTACH]


Attached Files
.jpg   4907 Stamp on FPCC flyer in AUG same as Reilly stub and Stamp kit CE115.jpg (Size: 247.1 KB / Downloads: 30)
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.....
R. Hunter
Reply
#3
[ATTACH=CONFIG]6125[/ATTACH]


Attached Files
.jpg   Oswalds Stamp kit.jpg (Size: 475.79 KB / Downloads: 29)
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.....
R. Hunter
Reply
#4
Oswald is hired at Riley May 9, 1963. Oswald moved into the Magazine Street address on May 10, 1963. Oswald orders the handbills on May 29, 1963. That paystub is dated May 31, 1963. The first documented distribution of the handbills is June 16, 1963.

Looking at the handbills, it looks like either Oswald didn't know what address to use on 5/29/63, (unlikely since he already had an apartment but didn't have a P.O. Box) leaving the address blank, or he already had his stamp kit. He ordered 1000 handbills, so apparently he figures he was going to use a P.O. Box at some point later, and so leaves the address blank. At any rate, the handbills are printed without an address. The "later" handbills are stamped with the PO Box he obtains on June 3, 1963.

Since the paystub is 5/31/63, that looks fairly contemporaneous with the arrival of the handbills and prior to the first documented distribution. He could just be testing his stamp pad on the paystub. It is stamped twice.

Is there a similar stamp on the Jagger paystub? I also notice that there must be 2 more stamp kits, the "A.J. Hidell" stamp and the "Dr. Hideel" stamp kit, both with the PO. Box so they must date after 6/3/63.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply
#5
No stamps on the Jagger stub... and we know he changed the stamp a couple of times...

Are we to assume the LAST address he used on the stamp was the last one he created? yet it still appears on the May 31, 1963 Reilly stub?

I realilze he could have used the paycheck stub as a test area for the stamp... just seems odd given all the other places he could stamp as well as the similarities to stamps we find related to Oswald on other documents..

Just found ir odd...

DJ


[ATTACH=CONFIG]6126[/ATTACH]


Attached Files
.jpg   Oswald paycheck stubs from Jaeggers and Reilly Coffee with Stamp.jpg (Size: 168.35 KB / Downloads: 28)
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.....
R. Hunter
Reply
#6
He would have received the pay stub on 5/31 or perhaps a couple days later. May 31 was a Friday. He orders the handbills, assuming the paycheck is coming, and obtains the handbills (and pays for them) the same day he is actually paid or shortly thereafter.

Both stamped handbills appear in the WC records:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]6127[/ATTACH]

Maybe he's figured he's going to get his teeth kicked in if he stamps the handbills with his real name and address.


Attached Files
.jpg   oswald handbills.jpg (Size: 161.03 KB / Downloads: 4)
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply
#7
Drew Phipps Wrote:He would have received the pay stub on 5/31 or perhaps a couple days later. May 31 was a Friday. He orders the handbills, assuming the paycheck is coming, and obtains the handbills (and pays for them) the same day he is actually paid or shortly thereafter.

Both stamped handbills appear in the WC records:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]6127[/ATTACH]

Maybe he's figured he's going to get his teeth kicked in if he stamps the handbills with his real name and address.

So wouldn't that mean the stamp would be changed AFTER he uses his own name and address? So that by the time it is photogrpahed for CE115, the layout has been updated...

The way it appears, the 4907 address would be the LAST place he configured the stamp... doesn't make sense...
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.....
R. Hunter
Reply
#8
Information from "Oswald & the CIA" by John Newman:

Warrior Rubber Stamping kit cost $.98.
Oswald used 2 other variant addresses P.O. Box 30016 and 544 Camp Street.
Oswald practiced with his new stamp kit on June 8, 1963.

CE 115 from WC Vol XVI:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]6128[/ATTACH]

Looks like Oswald pretty much just changed the stamp whenever it suited him.


Attached Files
.jpg   WC Vxvi CE Exhibit 115.jpg (Size: 94.88 KB / Downloads: 7)
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  If the case against Oswald was legitimate Gil Jesus 0 234 04-07-2024, 12:11 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Government's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part III Gil Jesus 0 514 10-12-2023, 12:08 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Govenment's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part II Gil Jesus 1 571 28-11-2023, 03:36 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Why the Government's case against Oswald is BS --- Part I Gil Jesus 1 594 15-11-2023, 04:55 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Thomas Kelley reports Oswald said he did not view parade Richard Gilbride 1 650 26-09-2023, 04:31 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Evidence of Witness Tampering in the case against Oswald Gil Jesus 0 645 28-07-2023, 11:31 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  The REAL reason Oswald went to Irving on 11.21.63 Gil Jesus 1 771 15-06-2023, 03:46 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Conclusion Gil Jesus 1 927 01-04-2023, 04:23 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Part IV Gil Jesus 0 691 26-03-2023, 02:10 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Oswald and the Shot at Walker Jim DiEugenio 1 845 24-03-2023, 04:35 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)