Posts: 856
Threads: 52
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Aug 2013
.
For the fifth time, Tom Scully....
You seem to be back online once more. I've checked your links above and haven't found "almost word for word" copies of your research in John Armstrong's "Postal Money Orders" article that I hid for more than three weeks at your request. I have found all sorts of copies of Mr. Armstrong's words at your links that I know you don't have permission to re-post.
Please copy and post in this thread Mr. Armstrong's words that you say he took from you. I will check them. Otherwise, I plan to unhide Mr. Armstrong's article within days if you don't respond ....
Do you need me to unhide the web page now so you can quote the words that offended you so terribly?
It's time to respond, Tom Scully....
Jim
Posts: 856
Threads: 52
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Aug 2013
25-01-2016, 05:23 AM
(This post was last modified: 25-01-2016, 04:49 PM by Jim Hargrove.)
6th request....
To Tom Scully,
Your refusal to clarify your accusations against JA and me with specific examples of "almost word for word" copying have damaged both JA and me.
Post examples or retract the statement!
Jim
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
I move that Scully has been given due notice and is passing on his claim.
Posts: 150
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
Albert Doyle Wrote:I move that Scully has been given due notice and is passing on his claim.
Seconded.
Posts: 856
Threads: 52
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Aug 2013
7th Notice....
This is stupid,
Tom Scully......
The
Postal Money Order Page by
John Armstrong is back up on the Harvey and Lee website and its mirrors right
HERE. It will soon become part of the much larger "Rifle" page at HarveyandLee.net.
Your refusal to clarify your accusations against JA and me with specific examples of "almost word for word" copying have damaged both JA and me.
For the
seventh time, please post examples of your accusation or retract your claim!
Posts: 856
Threads: 52
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Aug 2013
27-01-2016, 06:45 AM
(This post was last modified: 27-01-2016, 04:07 PM by Jim Hargrove.)
[size=12]For the 8TH TIME ....
[/SIZE]
The Postal Money Order page by John Armstrong is back up on the Harvey and Lee website right
HERE. Most visitors will not see it, but it will soon become part of the much larger "Rifle" page at HarveyandLee.net.
Show me where Mr. Armstrong "copied" your research "nearly word for word."
Posts: 856
Threads: 52
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Aug 2013
Michael Cross Wrote:Albert Doyle Wrote:I move that Scully has been given due notice and is passing on his claim.
Seconded.
NOTICE # 9:
The Postal Money Order page by John Armstrong is back up on the Harvey and Lee website right HERE. Most visitors will not see it, but it will soon become part of the much larger "Rifle" page at HarveyandLee.net. [URL="http://HARVEYANDLEE.NET"]
[/URL]
Show me, TOM SCULLY, where Mr. Armstrong "COPIED" your research, AS YOU CLAIM, "nearly word for word." PLEASE POST IT RIGHT HERE IN THE FOLLOWING EXTRA SPACE:
Jim
Posts: 856
Threads: 52
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Aug 2013
Michael Cross Wrote:Albert Doyle Wrote:I move that Scully has been given due notice and is passing on his claim.
Seconded.
NOTICE # 10:
To Tom Scully:
This is my tenth and final notice to you in this matter.
Why have you tried to bury John Armstrong's article on U.S. Postal Money Orders (which will soon become a deep background page for his new LHO RIFLE article) if you are unwilling or unable to back up your accusations of plagiarism? Do you REALLY care about the assassination of JFK, or do you care more about disrupting the research of John Armstrong? Maybe you are you a sheep in wolf's clothing, eh?
The Postal Money Order page by Mr. Armstrong is now back up on the Harvey and Lee website right [size=12]HERE. Most visitors will not see it yet, but it will soon become part of the much larger "Rifle" page at HarveyandLee.net, which I plan to promote widely, and which I guarantee you will receive tens of thousands of unique visits early in its history. [URL="http://harveyandlee.net/"]
[/URL]
For the TENTH AND FINAL TIME, TOM SCULLY, show me where Mr. Armstrong "COPIED" your research, as you claim, "nearly word for word." Don't offer links to inscrutable data dumps. Post the words you found so offensive in the extra space provided right here:
Jim
This is STUPID, Tom Scully! For the tenth and final time, speak up or get lost!!!!! Good bye.[/SIZE]
Posts: 856
Threads: 52
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Aug 2013
Does no one else here find this offensive?
Posts: 150
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
Not sure if offensive is the right word. Mr. Scully has forfeited any credibility with regard to his original claim.
Move forward with your work.