I've been banned from posting at ED FORUM

[Peter Lemkin]

Sorry, this is the post:



the film was not seen as a film until 1975...


what's left can be argued - and has been argued - that it is not conclusive IN THE CONDITION IT WAS OFFERED


Fast forward 30 years and everyone has desktop software which can do things that were impossible back then... there was no OBVIOUS anything... Dub'ya here illustrates the prime problem with the 99%... they apply 2018 thought to 1963 circumstances


TODAY it is most obvious the Zfilm was altered and does not represent the in-camera original....


What Dub'ya just can't understand is something called
I N T E L L E C T U A L C U R I O U S I T Y
Never had it, never will have it.... he likes to be TOLD OVER AND OVER since he can't be bothered to LEARN.

of what relevance is this to this thread?

[Dawn Meredith]

Peter,

As far as I know, James Gordon is still in charge at the Education Forum.

I'd like to note that I don't believe in banning anyone from forums, unless they are extremely vulgar or make threatening posts. Even then, I'd want to warn them a few times. This includes even those I have clashed with constantly, like Greg Parker, or the extremely unpopular like Jim Fetzer.

I have been contacted by Brian/Albert Doyle, regarding his status at this forum (and the Ed Forum, for that matter). He sent me a private message here. Is there a reason why he can't post here? For the record, I didn't agree with Doyle all that often, but like Parker or Farley or anyone else I may disagree with, I support his right to be heard.

A forum that had the Fetzers, Doyles, Parkers, Josephs, Lemkins, DiEugenios, etc. posting regularly would certainly be a hard one to moderate. But it would be very informative and entertaining.

Doyle needs to be banned. The trash he wrote about us on another forum was sickening.
His PM ability needs to end soon as Magda gets to it. And we had MUCH discussion about him before we all reached our breaking point.
As for "Tommy" I must keep my views to myself. I find it best to just avoid him.

[Lauren Johnson]

There is a limit to what the moderators will put up with and Doyle exceeded it by a country mile.

AMEN!!

[Jim DiEugenio]

I was not aware Doyle trashed the forum someplace else.

Was this at Duncan's?

I thought he only trashed me.

It was foul mouthed? Oh geez.

[Peter Lemkin]

I was not aware Doyle trashed the forum someplace else.

Was this at Duncan's?

I thought he only trashed me.

It was foul mouthed? Oh geez.

In truth, I forget where it was. I was sent a PM, and perhaps it was also posted here, with the link. I certainly read it, and it was as foul as one can get - much aimed at me [then the only moderator standing against his being kicked out], as well as the the other moderators,and Forum generally. I didn't capture it - why bother - it was an example of exactly the type of behavior and thinking we want nothing to do with here, but I'm sure somewhere on the internet it likely still exists.....

[Dawn Meredith]

I was not aware Doyle trashed the forum someplace else.

Was this at Duncan's?

I thought he only trashed me.

It was foul mouthed? Oh geez.

It was a long facebook post Jlm that I copied and pasted to our mods here. Under his real name. Then I blocked him on fb.

[Richard Gilbride]

Don Jefferies, post #7: "I didn't agree with Doyle all that often, but like Parker or Farley or anyone else I may disagree with, I support his right to be heard."

Ditto.

Doyle has been unfairly targeted with a nightmare of abuse ever since he correctly discerned that the PrayerMan figure is at the front of the TSBD landing- and therefore cannot be Lee Harvey Oswald, since he's a full head shorter than Wesley Frazier.

This is a scientific certainty, which 90% of forum members don't process.

And the moderators here want to ban Doyle, since he vented some anger on his Facebook page? Is he supposed to be a doormat? And always act like Mother Theresa?

This spring, God willing, I will obtain a digital scan of the Darnell film, and eradicate this PrayerMan nonsense for keeps.

And those who have called for Doyle's removal will resemble the lunatic tribe in Lord of the Flies.

[Jim DiEugenio]

I love this latest Gilbride rationale.

First, it was me, Jim DiEugenio, who somehow was responsible for getting Doyle banned.

Which was not true per cause and was not true per effect. Doyle was not banned at that time, he was on moderation. That was true of here and at EF. And it was not over me.

Then Doyle goes hog wild and issues a foul mouthed denunciation on FB. And now that is Ok with Gilbride also!

What would not be OK with Rich? Maybe if he and Doyle hacked this sight or maybe ROKC? All in their unbelievable Richard the Lion Hearted Crusade to preserve the lunch room encounter and dismantle PM from the face of the earth?

Talk about people losing all sense of balance and proportion.

And BTW, Doyle is still trying to PM me. I couldn't decipher his last wild rant so I will not open up one again.

[Peter Lemkin]

Doyle was not first several times put on moderation and then removed because of his irrational obsession with 'Prayerman', but because of his repeated behavior which was against the rules and ethos of this Forum. That said, this is the DEEP Politics Forum and was conceived to go beyond the usual political/historical analysis along the lines of what PDS called Deep Political Analysis. To the disappointment of myself and I think most of the owners and moderators the usual gang of boys who never grow up and are always trapped in the Plaza appear. I too have investigated some minute details that occurred on 11.22.63 or in or near the Plaza - but here we expect some effort put into how it informs to the larger picture - of who was behind the assassination, why they did it, how it effected and still effects our polity, etc. Same with 911, same with most everything - otherwise it is shallow political analysis of just playing Sherlock Holmes or just a food fight over details not related to the larger picture - much to the pleasure of the authors of the assassination and other covert and false-flag operations. There are plenty forums that love that kind of 'debate' without the wider context ever mentioned - this is not one of those. We tolerate this to an extent, despite NOT liking it - but when one endlessly breaks the rules and/or is adjudged to be a troll, they are shown the door.

This is not a thread about Doyle and he should not be mentioned further here - or frankly anywhere on the Forum. Discussion of Doyle is now over. I have nothing more to say on the subject. He tricked/wheedled someone to post for him here, as he has done many times before. He has continued to PM the moderators, but that has now been blocked. He is history, and it is time to end all discussion about it. His threads and posts remain.

[Lauren Johnson]

Doyle has been unfairly targeted with a nightmare of abuse ever since he correctly discerned that the PrayerMan figure is at the front of the TSBD landing- and therefore cannot be Lee Harvey Oswald, since he's a full head shorter than Wesley Frazier.

I can assure you and anyone else that Brian Doyle was not persecuted for his beliefs.

Here is the Facebook post that Dawn copied for the rest of the mods to read. It was the final straw, although it was polite compared to some of the private messages we got from him. It was on Facebook so it's fair game.

What is really pathetic is how Deep Politics allowed Lauren Johnson to finally make his move and become site dictator over the Prayer Man theory...Lauren has been itching to get total power ever since Magda made the mistake of putting him in charge...It is clear that Lauren is desperate to volunteer his commitment to oversee the forum because of his need to compensate for his lack of evidence analysis skill...Lauren is an entity that only exists on the Deep Politics Forum and nowhere else...He's drunk on his own power and the girls, Dawn and Magda, are too frivolous to notice or care about its affect on the site's integrity...The site is a Jim DiEugenio fan club where Lauren, because of his intellectual deficiency, simply runs the site according to what Jim posts...You are now officially not allowed to criticize DiEugenio and no rules apply to him (or Lauren and the girls)...Jim D comes in to the site, opens his ass-crack and whistles to Magda, Lauren, and Dawn and they dutifully scurry in where it is warm and cozy (and dark)...This is now the new rule on DPF overseen by a dim-witted bully named Lauren Johnson with the full approval of British dingbat Magda Hassan who also has zero record of intelligent analysis...And the empty suit Alan Dale, who bans people when they express truths, says his side is appealing for objectivity and trying to avoid bias...Dale is all form and no wit...And how Dawn ever ended up in charge is beyond me...The intellectual content of her posts is that of a 12 year old Texas cheerleader...

We got a lot more of this "material" in private IM's and much worse. Brian did this to himself.

Richard, good luck with the digital scan. Really. If it proves your point, great. But even if it does, Brian has burned his bridges here.