Posts: 30
Threads: 9
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jun 2018
06-07-2018, 10:38 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-07-2018, 12:02 PM by Peter Lemkin.)
In my years arguing with the official story folks i found one argument particularly odd Fact one they are confident that the damage from the impact and fires from the jetliners collisions with the towers was sufficient to have caused the collapses But when you mention demolition, the requirements to have brought down the structures suddenly change and now it requires a massive preparatory scheme that would have had to have gotten at all the core columns, and other pivotal support structures, and would have taken weeks if not months of preparation to have accomplished Hopefully that gaping contradiction does not need further elaboration Perhaps obvios to many of you but I have never seen it clearly stated
Posts: 16,120
Threads: 1,776
Likes Received: 1 in 1 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
06-07-2018, 10:58 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-07-2018, 12:04 PM by Peter Lemkin.)
Matt Grantham Wrote:In my years arguing with the official story folks i found one argument particularly odd Fact one they are confident that the damage from the impact and fires from the jetliners collisions with the towers was sufficient to have caused the collapses But when you mention demolition, the requirements to have brought down the structures suddenly change and now it requires a massive preparatory scheme that would have had to have gotten at all the core columns, and other pivotal support structures, and would have taken weeks if not months of preparation to have accomplished Hopefully that gaping contradiction does not need further elaboration Perhaps obvious to many of you but I have never seen it clearly stated
I don't see any contradiction. Like any false-flag covert operation it did take months of VERY careful preparation; and the how, when, where of that has all been worked out IMO. The best single source is by Kevin Ryan. Part I of V parts is here:
http://911truth.org/demolition-access-to-the-world-trade-center-towers-part-one-tenants/
I strongly suggest you read all parts.
Welcome to the Forum Matt. Please take some time to read up on some of the issues that have been covered before. An external search engine limited to this website works better than the internal search engine - or you can just look at all the 911 threads here and dig in.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Posts: 30
Threads: 9
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jun 2018
Thanks for the reply Perhaps my point is not clear The contradiction is in the mind of those believing in the official story On the one hand they believe a plane impact explains the collapse , on the other hand they believe it would have taken weeks or months to have wired the building to create the conditions to bring it down in the fashion scene Are those not two different standards for the conditions for global collapse?
