24-01-2024, 09:24 PM
Bojczuk is a fraud because, like Von Pein, he adapts the "perfect evidence or nothing" canard...Bojczuk is over on the Education Forum saying the Harvey & Lee theory is damaging to credible JFK research because of its potential to blow back on the research community as a crazy theory that taints all JFK research...As if he were sincere and speaking as a concerned conspiracy researcher...
However if you look in to Bojczuk's background he was a firm member of Greg Parker's ROKC troll farm and its subversive undermining of JFK research...Bojczuk never once aimed his phony criticism towards Parker's troll farm or any of its nutty claims...Like a true Lone Nutter wolf in sheep's clothing Bojczuk saves his criticism for one of the most important and exotic cases of conspiracy evidence in the form of Armstrong's discovery...
There's a simple way to determine that Bojczuk is a phony...Of all the theories that are ripe for ridicule and calls for protecting the research community from the Prayer Man theory is on the top of the list, yet ROKC member Bojzcuk never aims his so-called righteous indignation towards that bogus theory that came from the trollish mind of Greg Parker...I have more than proven that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton - yet Mr make his living off of calling bullshit Bojzcuk never once mentioned this or criticized any of Parker's other crazy crap with the same zeal...Bojzcuk practices the exact same silence over my research as David Von Pein, even though it would be a real victory for him to point it out...The reason why Bojzcuk and Von Pein stay silent about my refutation of Prayer Man is because they don't want to give me any credit lest it lead to further crediting of my serious other discoveries...
Bojzcuk and his actions perfectly fit that of a COINTELPRO subversive...He attacks the most exotic and damning conspiracy evidence in the form of Armstrong and supports the worst Trojan Horse bullshit theories like Prayer Man and Parker...Bojzcuk is a fraud because he pretends to be demanding rigor but his real purpose is to avoid recognizing the more than obvious evidence that has already been shown...Because the Education Forum is negligent in judging content Lone Nutter trolls like Bojzcuk have the advantage because they never have to account for their input and are always given equal status in relation to those who have done the hard work of proving the best evidence...
I have never seen Bojczuk recognize my new discovery of Sarah Stanton hearing Oswald say he wasn't going down to watch the motorcade but was going back in to the Break Room instead...Like most of the Education Forum, that puts the lie to their claim of seeking the most important evidence...
The problem with the Education Forum and research community can be put in a nutshell with this...The reason Bojczuk isn't called out on this on the Education Forum is because they have such a corrupted bias towards Prayer Man that it keeps them from using the best weapon they could against the fraud Bojczuk...What a nasty tangled web we weave when we attempt to deceive...Because of their loyalty to this corrupted Prayer Man pack they have made a train wreck out of JFK research and failed to take their best punches...
However if you look in to Bojczuk's background he was a firm member of Greg Parker's ROKC troll farm and its subversive undermining of JFK research...Bojczuk never once aimed his phony criticism towards Parker's troll farm or any of its nutty claims...Like a true Lone Nutter wolf in sheep's clothing Bojczuk saves his criticism for one of the most important and exotic cases of conspiracy evidence in the form of Armstrong's discovery...
There's a simple way to determine that Bojczuk is a phony...Of all the theories that are ripe for ridicule and calls for protecting the research community from the Prayer Man theory is on the top of the list, yet ROKC member Bojzcuk never aims his so-called righteous indignation towards that bogus theory that came from the trollish mind of Greg Parker...I have more than proven that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton - yet Mr make his living off of calling bullshit Bojzcuk never once mentioned this or criticized any of Parker's other crazy crap with the same zeal...Bojzcuk practices the exact same silence over my research as David Von Pein, even though it would be a real victory for him to point it out...The reason why Bojzcuk and Von Pein stay silent about my refutation of Prayer Man is because they don't want to give me any credit lest it lead to further crediting of my serious other discoveries...
Bojzcuk and his actions perfectly fit that of a COINTELPRO subversive...He attacks the most exotic and damning conspiracy evidence in the form of Armstrong and supports the worst Trojan Horse bullshit theories like Prayer Man and Parker...Bojzcuk is a fraud because he pretends to be demanding rigor but his real purpose is to avoid recognizing the more than obvious evidence that has already been shown...Because the Education Forum is negligent in judging content Lone Nutter trolls like Bojzcuk have the advantage because they never have to account for their input and are always given equal status in relation to those who have done the hard work of proving the best evidence...
I have never seen Bojczuk recognize my new discovery of Sarah Stanton hearing Oswald say he wasn't going down to watch the motorcade but was going back in to the Break Room instead...Like most of the Education Forum, that puts the lie to their claim of seeking the most important evidence...
The problem with the Education Forum and research community can be put in a nutshell with this...The reason Bojczuk isn't called out on this on the Education Forum is because they have such a corrupted bias towards Prayer Man that it keeps them from using the best weapon they could against the fraud Bojczuk...What a nasty tangled web we weave when we attempt to deceive...Because of their loyalty to this corrupted Prayer Man pack they have made a train wreck out of JFK research and failed to take their best punches...