Daniel Pipes recommends bombing Iran

[Carsten Wiethoff]

I hate to bring attention to Agent Provocateurs, but this is the worst I have seen for a long time. And it gets published in Germany by the Springer press.
http://www.danielpipes.org/7921/bomb-ira...presidency
:puke:

[Bernice Moore]

Thanks but MAY I recommend that Daniel Pipes have his head read...no shite...b..

[Carsten Wiethoff]

The point is, this stuff gets published all over the world in mainstream publications. It is in the Jerusalem Post, the German "Die Welt", and of course all over the blogosphere.
It is most likely a calculated provocation, maybe to look for the most likely reaction if Iran would really be bombed (by Israel, for example). Fortunately the reactions seem to be overwhelmingly negative, even in Israel.
Of course nobody in his right mind would believe that Mr Pipes is really giving Obama good advice (and that Obama is listening to him).

Enough of that shit.

[Chris Bowen]

I thought the following the most interesting :eek: moment in Blair's recent public performance of "Je ne regrette rien" was the following unrepentant statement :

"So if you were to look at Iran today, the reason why I take, and still take, [size=12][size=12]a very hard line on Iran and nuclear weapons is not just because of nuclear proliferation, it is because the nature of the Iranian regime makes me even more worried about the prospect of them with a nuclear device."[/SIZE]

Looks like the zionists / neo-cons are all singing from the same hymn-sheet.

Wonder if this "hard-line" includes deployment of one of these ? >> http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?c...&aid=15661
[/SIZE]