Badgeman

[Magda Hassan]

Too many duplicates. There are no choices. It happens chronologically. Just the way it is.

[Bob Ringler]

Did you happen to notice all the piling on that went on that caused me to create a new thread? Did you do anything to prevent that so I did not have to create a new thread?

If you are going to do that you should at least allow me to pick which thread will be first in the series.

[Magda Hassan]

Just carry on from here. You can use the quote function if you want to refer to a particular post.

[Bob Ringler]

Did you notice the piling on? Why did you ignore that?

What are your rules regarding harassment? How do you define harassment?

If you let harrassment to continue and then prevent me from creating new threads to escape that harassment, then I might as well not post anything.

How about this. Will you delete the badgeman thread completely and give me a chance to start a new one? This will give me a chance to make clear at the beginning those points that I want to make clear. I think that is the equitable way to handle this kind of situation.

[Dawn Meredith]

you got to watch out for duncan.

I suggest you take up duncans challenge and ask him to produce that negative.

The House Committee on assassinations could not find it. But duncan can find it.

I say make a public demand on duncan to produce that negative.


If a member of his forum has the negative then lets do it. Many researches would like to have access to that negative.

I say call duncans bluff. (because that is all it is).

We can answer this question once and for all.

Duncans desire to harass me out weighs his good judgment sometimes.

Enough is enough. Please stop insulting people and making DEMANDS. THis is a serious forum. We don't permit spamming and the like. I have been too busy with my job the last few days to spend time here but just reading through this thread it is becoming clear that you have an agenda and it is not truth. "Duncan's bluff?" "Jack's refusal" to respond to "hard questions"? Please. You are sounding like just another Jack attacker and we are all very tired of that crap. He has given his life to this case and still answers questions every day. Duncan too, has been doing this for many years. His work is very respected. You are bordering on harrassment.
The HSCA could not find a lot of things because they choose not to. And if you were a true serious researcher you would know this very basic truth. I am reading that you have been banned from other forums. Mind telling us which forums and why?

Dawn

I have only read up to this post above so perhaps I should have waited until I reached the rest of this thread but I am willing to bet it is just more of the same.

[Bob Ringler]

Saying things "Duncans bluff" and "Jacks Refusal" is not insulting. In fact it very mild compared to jwhat you can find on any other thread.

I also cant agree you with because if you were truly unbiased you would have found 10 times more insults of more severity directed towards me. But you seemed to miss all of that.

I am not sure what you mean by a serious forum. The subjects that I am discussing could not be more serious.

I am not a Jack White basher, in fact I did not even know such people existed. I was seriously interested in his reasoning and support for placing badgeman behind the fence. Anyone reading my posts would know that is what I was interested in, nothing more. Jack has made a very important judgment about where badgeman should be. But it is only a judgement, it is not supported by any data or facts. That is what I learned. I have no more questions on that subject.

[Dean Hagerman]

. Anyone reading my posts would know that is what I was interested in, nothing more.

Everyone who is reading your posts knows what you are interested in Bob, and thats trying to make those of us who study the photographic side of the assassination stupid by posting pixelated garbage and claiming you see gunman in every inch of every picture

Bob we see your kind all the time, there is no way in the world that someone that claims as you do to be researching the photograpic eveidence in the case would have no clue where badgeman is in the Moorman picture

You are fake Bob, you are not real, your only reason on this or any JFK forum is to cause problems

[Bob Ringler]

You cannot reconcile jacks badgeman group picture with the actual moorman photo. It cannot be done in a believable way.

If it can be done that I ask jack to show us how to do it.

It cannot be done. Thats why you only see the "badgeman group" picture. You dont see where that group is in relationship to the rest of the picture.

If that is causing trouble then I apologize , it is not my intent.

If jack tries to do it, I think he knows he will prove the point that badgeman has to be infront of the fence.

I think you know that to dean, thats why you wont do it either.


Unlike anyone else , I believe badgeman exists, I support jack in that. I just believe that badgeman is infront of the fence.

If jack tries to reconcile the badgeman group blowup to the moorman photo it will prove that badgeman is infront of the fence.

[Duncan MacRae]

Bob, quit playing the fool. You are getting away with murder on this Forum.

Now, I've showed you more than half a dozen times, here and elsewhere, the relationship of the 3 figures with the whole Moorman photograph.

There is no need to keep demanding and harassing Jack to do it, when I have already supplied the information that you seek.

You know damn well the overall picture of the 3 figures in Moorman, and to pretend not to know is a givaway to your agenda.

You'll only get away with this extreme foolishness for so long.

Here it is YET AGAIN!

[Bob Ringler]

I did not ask you duncan, because quite frankly I dont think your work can be trusted.

When you put those inserts in to make your points you are obscuring the turth you are not illuminating it.

I trust Jack, all jack has to do is circle the area in moorman. Thats it.



On a different subject I noticed today this animated gif you created.
You did everything you could to make him look bigger.

Here is what you drew ( i think you deliberately obscured it)




Here is how I draw it.



He also has a radio attached to his right shoulder. There is too much detail available for this to be an accident. (I think he is holding a rifle to but I dont want to scare the children.)

Speaking of radios .... I think this man has a radio to.