Posts: 6,184
Threads: 242
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Dawn Meredith Wrote:Bob Ringler Wrote:duncan,
You have a problem. You need help.
I agree with Jack, this is starting to look like the Ed forum. Duncan, Dean, and whoever else is responding, try following Jack's advice and quit responding. (I will do the same).
To answer your question Bob, what I meant by a "serious forum" is one where people are serious about issues of a deep political nature. That research and opinions be valid, that we don't flame each other, that name calling is not permitted. That we don't try to diagnose anyone as "needing help" . We have a list of rules. And we require real names not to follow people form forum to forum but because people should have the courage to stand behind their posts, not hide behind some fake name.
But I do note that you did not answer my question regarding being banned from which forums and why?
Dawn
I wholeheartedly agree with Dawn
This thread has degenerated rapidly into spam and namecalling, with little meaningful content.
Clean it up. Now.
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
Posts: 75
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
30-04-2010, 08:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 30-04-2010, 08:17 PM by Bob Ringler.)
I didnt see your question. What is your question. But you need to show me that you are unbiased. Are you saying you dont see all the name calling that duncan does?
If I didnt answer your question it is because I did not see it. You phrased it in a way like I did it intentionally.
Duncan banned me from his forum. Dont you think thats a litttle strange that he would follwow me over here to do the same exact thing? And dont you care about that?
Duncans forum required real names too. And duncan has used that feature to follow me over hear and continue to harass just as he did at his own forum.
I think it will be your loss if you ban me. I know how to get to the heart of an issue. But if you are going to blame all problems on me I wouldnt want to be here anyway. I need know that you are unbiased.
Posts: 16
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2010
Dawn you are right and I will not post in this thread any longer
I just want you guys to see that this guy is a fake, and from the looks of it he is saying that Bob Ringer is not his real name
"Pictures dont lie-unless they are made to" Harold Weisberg 1966
Posts: 75
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
Quote:Dawn you are right and I will not post in this thread any longer
I just want you guys to see that this guy is a fake, and from the looks of it he is saying that Bob Ringer is not his real name
Here is another insult.
I dont start the insults. I just respond to them.
Posts: 75
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
Using sitzmans height at the location of badgeman shows that badgeman is not a giant.
Posts: 56
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
Bob Ringler Wrote:I didnt see your question. What is your question. But you need to show me that you are unbiased. Are you saying you dont see all the name calling that duncan does?
If I didnt answer your question it is because I did not see it. You phrased it in a way like I did it intentionally.
Duncan banned me from his forum. Dont you think thats a litttle strange that he would follwow me over here to do the same exact thing? And dont you care about that?
Duncans forum required real names too. And duncan has used that feature to follow me over hear and continue to harass just as he did at his own forum.
I think it will be your loss if you ban me. I know how to get to the heart of an issue. But if you are going to blame all problems on me I wouldnt want to be here anyway. I need know that you are unbiased.
You just can't stop posting your your false accusations about me, can you? Cut it out.
Posts: 75
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
I havent made any false accusations duncan.
Posts: 56
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
Bob Ringler Wrote:Using sitzmans height at the location of badgeman shows that badgeman is not a giant.
You've posted this already.
Sitzman and the wall are different distances from the Betzner lens.
Your Sitzman measuring stick, as you call it, is invalid for making a comparison.
Posts: 75
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
30-04-2010, 09:01 PM
(This post was last modified: 30-04-2010, 09:03 PM by Bob Ringler.)
You obviously have never been to dealey plaza.
The distance between sitzmans position and badgemans location in that picture is not large enough to make a significant difference in the heights of the two people.
And any difference would just make sitzman fit better.
You are not the forum adminsitrator here duncan. Where the administrators.
Posts: 56
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
Have you ever visited Earth? lol