Posts: 56
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
The man in the middle is not real, but if he was, he would be well elevated behind the fence.
Jack and Gary did an honest study at the time, and they said it how they honestly seen it at the time.
Your analysis of the middle man is bonkers, Just look at the real people in my overlay comparison. I still think you're trying to pull everyone's leg here.
![[Image: stupid_comparisom.gif]](http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i286/niteprowler147/stupid_comparisom.gif)
Posts: 75
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
Contrary to what duncan would have you believe in his previous photos there is an elevation difference between infront and behind the retaining wall. That is why they call it a retaining wall.
This picture shows the obvious difference in elevation
![[Image: murray_retaining_wall.jpg]](http://hogtuner.net/bman/murray_retaining_wall.jpg)
Posts: 56
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
How thick can you get. I'm beginning to believe, like Jack, that you might have some kind of wacko agenda for joining all of the forums, and spam posting your wackiness over and over again, when it could all go in one neat thread. You can't make a comparison between figures from two different pictures, and make an exact comparison measurement. And..I didn't say that there was no elevation between the wall and the fence...Don't misquote me again, OK RINGLER?.... God give me strength.
Posts: 75
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
duncan does not like it when he shown to be wrong. Thats when he starts calling people names.
Posts: 56
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
Are you mad? I've made highly critical comments, I haven't called you any names.
An apology from you for would be in order.
Posts: 56
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
Deleted duplicate post.[url=http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,616.0.html][/url]
Posts: 1,059
Threads: 77
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Bob Ringler Wrote:Jack,
I am here for the truth. I do not intend to be confrontional with you and I dont think I have been. I have been insistant and I do have some hard questions to put to you.
Bob
I am not her to TAKE HARD QUESTIONS.:hello:
Posts: 1,059
Threads: 77
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Keith Millea Wrote:I'm not a JFK researcher,so this might be a stupid question for some.I find this picture of the Badgeman to be pretty remarkable.My question is,"What is the white spot around Badgemans neck area?Is this a muzzle flash,or possibly smoke?"Thank you.
![[Image: badgeman_group.jpg]](http://hogtuner.net/bman/badgeman_group.jpg)
Yes...a puff of smoke.
Jack
Posts: 16,099
Threads: 1,767
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Jack White Wrote:Keith Millea Wrote:I'm not a JFK researcher,so this might be a stupid question for some.I find this picture of the Badgeman to be pretty remarkable.My question is,"What is the white spot around Badgemans neck area?Is this a muzzle flash,or possibly smoke?"Thank you.
Yes...a puff of smoke.
Jack
Tom Wilson's work re-confirmed all of this. Enough of this 'Doubting-Thomas' stuff.....please!
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Posts: 75
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
29-04-2010, 08:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 29-04-2010, 08:27 PM by Bob Ringler.)
This is doubting thomas.
I'm sorry but Jack is not god. In fact that is the problem. His research needs to be subject to examination. And he should be very willing to explain this. I would say he owes to the next geneartion of reshearchers to explain this clearly, to remove the fog and the noise.
If the two men who supposedly sit at the top of the research community refuse to be completely open about their work then we have a problem.
