This thread comes full circle, because of the below article about former Prime Minister, Edward Heath, who is believed to have been a regular visitor to the Haut de la Garenne boys home on Jersey, where, apparently, he took boys aboard his yacht, nicknamed "Morning Sickness" by his security police.
However, Heath didn't bugger alone.
Quote:
Sir Edward Heath WAS a paedophile, says police chief: Astonishing claim is made that the former PM is guilty of vile crimes 'covered up by the Establishment'
More than 30 people have come forward with claims about the former PM
And they are said to have given 'strikingly similar' accounts to Wiltshire Police
The county's chief constable has said that the allegations are 'totally convincing'
Pictures have emerged of Heath driving - despite it being claimed he didn't have a car
Edward Heath with his piano at his home Arundells in Salisbury, Wiltshire
The police chief investigating claims that Sir Edward Heath was a paedophile is convinced the allegations are 120 per cent' genuine, The Mail on Sunday can reveal. More than 30 people have come forward with claims of sexual abuse by the former Conservative Prime Minister, according to well-placed sources. And they are said to have given strikingly similar' accounts of incidents to Wiltshire Police even though the individuals are not known to each other. The Mail on Sunday has been told that Wiltshire Chief Constable Mike Veale regards the allegations as totally convincing', and plans to publish a report in June. Detectives have established that, contrary to claims that Sir Edward could not have committed the crimes as he never drove a car' and always' had a police driver with him, he did drive and did have a car. They have photographic evidence that shows he is a driver, and have established that he had a driving licence. He also bought a Rover 2000 after being deposed as Tory leader by Margaret Thatcher in 1975, when he was 58. Astonishingly, Mr Veale is also understood to support claims that Sir Edward's alleged crimes were reported to police years ago but covered up by the Establishment. Some of those who said Sir Edward abused them are believed to have told police they went on to commit sexual abuse crimes themselves as a result. The investigation into Sir Edward, called Operation Conifer, was set up in 2015 in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal. Mr Veale came under pressure to abandon the inquiry last year after separate claims of a paedophile ring at Westminster involving former Home Secretary, the late Lord Brittan, and former Defence chief, Lord Bramall, were found to be groundless.
+7
Wiltshire Chief Constable Mike Veale regards the allegations as totally convincing', and plans to publish a report in June
Allegations that Sir Edward was involved in satanic orgies have been dismissed as fantasy by an expert asked to review the case. However, The Mail on Sunday has been told that Mr Veale believes the paedophile allegations are genuine. A source said: Mr Veale believes in them 120 per cent and thinks they are totally convincing. There are very close similarities in the accounts given by those who have come forward. The same names used for him, the same places and same type of incidents keep coming up. What stands out is that the people giving these accounts are not connected but the stories and the details dovetail. It contains disturbing stuff. Investigators have been shocked by what they have learned.' Another source said: The police were initially sceptical about the allegations, but now believe them. And they have come round to the view that they were covered up in the past because of who Heath was.
DO THESE PHOTOS UNDERMINE EX PM'S DEFENCE?
+7
Sir Edward Heath seen with his car in Weymouth, despite claims he never drove
These are the photographs that appear to disprove the notion that the allegations against Sir Edward cannot be true because he never drove a car' and was always accompanied by police. Both were taken in October 1975. In the main picture on the right, Heath is standing by the driver's door of the Rover 2000 he bought after Margaret Thatcher ousted him as Tory leader in February that year. In the picture on the left, he is seen arriving at the Tory Party conference in Blackpool in the driver's seat. The Mail on Sunday has learned that Wiltshire Police has also obtained photographic evidence of him driving. The issue was first raised by former Cabinet Secretary Lord Armstrong, who worked with Sir Edward in No 10. Lord Armstrong said Sir Edward whom he described as asexual' had a 24-hour police guard and driver from the day he became PM in 1970 to his death in 2005, and did not have his own car. When he was at home he had two policemen on the gate, he had the personal protection officer from Scotland Yard in the house, he never drove a car himself, he always had an official driver,' said Lord Armstrong. It seems highly unlikely he could have escaped all that to do the kind of thing that is described.'
+7
Sir Edward Heath again pictured driving, this time leaving leaves the conference for the sea breezes of Weymouth
Sir Edward bought the Rover after losing the chauffeur-driven car he was entitled to as Prime Minister, then Opposition leader. A confidant of the former PM said: He definitely could and did drive, though was a notoriously bad one. When he went to music concerts in Salzburg and hired a car, he was meant to drive it because his British police guards weren't officially allowed to. But they insisted as they were frightened he was going to crash.'
They will not be deflected by the rich and powerful trying to do the same now. Mike Veale is doing a great job and should be congratulated for his courage.' The disclosures come after several senior politicians dismissed the allegations against Heath as absurd and unfounded. Former Tory Foreign Secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind complained Heath's reputation was being besmirched'. Heath's sexuality has been the source of much speculation over the years. Some believed he was gay, others said he was asexual.' At one point, he was being investigated by no fewer than five police forces the Met, Wiltshire, Hampshire, Kent and Jersey. The claims, some of which have been proved false, include alleged links to a convicted brothel keeper known as Madame Ling-Ling. A paedophile dossier compiled by Labour peer Baroness Castle said he offered young boys trips on his yacht, and in a separate incident one man claimed Sir Edward picked him up hitchhiking in Kent as a 12-year-old in the 1960s and lured him to his Mayfair flat. Labour MP Tom Watson also said he had received allegations about Sir Edward. However the claims Mr Veale is investigating, which date from the 1960s to 1990s, are not linked to the discredited evidence of the man known as Nick', who alleged a high-level paedophile ring. One of the key counter-claims made when the allegations first surfaced came from former Cabinet Secretary Lord Armstrong, who worked with Heath when he was Prime Minister. He said Heath never drove a car' and always had at least one policeman with him from 1970 until his death in 2005.
+7
Labour MP Tom Watson also said he had received allegations about Sir Edward
The fact that Sir Edward could drive was confirmed last night by a friend, who said the former Prime Minister bought a car in 1975, although Sir Edward was later given a chauffeur-driven car and police guard after IRA death threats. Asked if Mr Veale believed the allegations against Sir Edward were totally convincing', a police spokesman said the Chief Constable was determined to ensure the investigation is proportionate, measured and legal' and that the job of the police was to impartially investigate allegations without fear or favour and go where the evidence takes us. It is not the role of the police to judge the guilt or innocence of people in our criminal justice system.' Further asked if Mr Veale had 120 per cent' faith in the allegations, the spokesman declined to comment.
Police refuse to call off the dogs after VIP child sex ring fiasco Launched in 2015 to investigate allegations against Sir Edward Heath, Operation Conifer has been dogged by claims that it traduces the reputation of a Prime Minister who died more than a decade ago and could not be put on trial. The operation, which has a staff of 17 and has run up a bill approaching £1 million, did not get off to a good start when Wiltshire Chief Constable Mike Veale had to apologise for launching it in front of cameras outside Sir Edward's former house, Arundells, in Salisbury. Demands to call it off grew last November when Scotland Yard was forced to abandon its Operation Midland investigation into similar claims of a VIP paedophile ring in Westminster. After a flurry of false accusations, Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe apologised to former Defence chief Lord Bramall, ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor, DJ Paul Gambaccini and Lady Brittan, widow of the late Lord Brittan.
+7
A police officer stands at the gate of Arundells, the former home of Heath when the probe was launched
Pressure on Operation Conifer mounted after this newspaper revealed how an expert, brought in by police to assess claims that Heath was linked to paedophiles who held satanic orgies, dismissed them as fantasy. Days after The Mail on Sunday report, Mr Veale came out fighting and insisted Operation Conifer was not a witch-hunt'. In a surprise statement released on December 2, he said he refused to buckle' to demands to abandon the inquiry, and stressed his officers had not spoken to Nick', the man at the root of Operation Midland. The Heath investigation was not a fishing trip', he said, adding that he was duty-bound' to go ahead with it without fear or favour and go where the evidence takes us'. He accused his critics of ignorance, and rebuked them for using inappropriate and unacceptable pressure' in an attempt to halt the inquiry. Mr Veale said a significant number of individuals' had alleged abuse, but refused to say how many or give details of the only two people to be arrested. He even said the findings of the investigation may never be made public, stating: A confidential closing report will be written… and at that time I will take advice as to what I can legally put in the public domain.' Police were testing, checking and challenging the evidence and ensuring our approach is proportionate and justified', he said. Mr Veale argues that although Sir Edward died in 2005, other offenders may still be alive and victims could require support. If the force had received allegations of non-recent child abuse against a former Prime Minister and done nothing, what would the reaction have been?'
+7
Margaret Thatcher and Edward Heath at the Conservative Party Conference in Blackpool
Edward Heath 'sex' claim as police appeal for victims in 2015
Progress: 0%
0:00
Previous
Play
Skip
Mute
Current Time0:00
/
Duration Time1:02
Fullscreen
Need Text
Lincoln Seligman, Sir Edward's godson, responded to Mr Veale's December statement by saying: If they have uncovered no evidence after 18 months they should say so. And if Conifer is wound up, [Sir Edward] deserves to be exonerated as publicly as he was initially smeared. Shuffling the inquiry's findings off into the night is not acceptable.' Other aspects of Operation Conifer have also come under fire. Wiltshire Police interviewed key figures at Private Eye because the satirical magazine joked about unmarried Sir Edward's sexuality 40 years ago. They wanted to know if its nickname for him, Sailor Ted', in his days as PM from 1970 to 1974, was a reference to rumours that he was gay. Police even asked current editor Ian Hislop what he knew about Heath, despite Hislop being a teenager during the period under investigation. Officers have also tracked down former Downing Street staff to ask them if young men were ever sneaked into No 10. Times writer and ex-Tory MP Matthew Parris dismissed the allegations, saying: If Heath was a child abuser, I'm an aardvark.'
Spot which one is the gay activist and which is the Aardvark?
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Quote:Colin Wallace and the Historical Institutional Abuse Inquiry
The Kincora cover-up continues
Robin Ramsay
Back story
This journal has been reporting on the Colin Wallace story
since 1986.1 Among the many striking things Wallace has spoken and written about over the years was the situation in the Kincora boys' home in Belfast in the early 1970s, where some of the inmates were being sexually abused by the male staff. One of them, the late William McGrath, was a senior figure in the Loyalist movement and ran a strange organisation called Tara.2 The Kincora abuse has been an acutely embarrassing issue for the British state because elements of its secret arms in Northern Ireland, MI5 and the RUC Special Branch, were aware of the abuse of the inmates but chose to ignore it because of MI5's interest in McGrath. Among the documents Wallace had kept from his days working for the secret state's psy-ops Information Policy unit in Northern Ireland was a memorandum he had written in 1974 which showed institutional awareness of the abuse at Kincora.3
1 If you are unfamiliar with Wallace, there is a reasonably accurate Wiki summary at <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Wallace>.
2 There is an introduction to Tara at <http://powerbase.info/index.php/TARA>. For more detail see the written report to HIA by former Tara member Roy Garland at <https://www.hiainquiry.org/sites/hiainqu...les/media- files/Roy%20Garland%20-%20KIN-130010%20to%20130074_ Redacted%20%282%29.pdf>.
3 A photocopy of that document is on page 82 of the collection of documents supplied by Wallace to be found on the HIA website at <https://www.hiainquiry.org/sites/hiainqu...dia-files/ Colin%20Wallace%20%20Material_0.pdf>.
When the current heightened awareness of institutional sexual abuse led to the creation of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) in 2014, rather than include Northern Ireland in IICSA, the British state set up a separate inquiry there, the inquiry into Historical Institutional Abuse in Northern Ireland between 1922 and 1995 (HIA).
But while the mainland UK inquiry has the power to compel testimony under oath, the Northern Ireland version did not. When this was announced we knew that another Kincora cover-up was going to be perpetrated and British secret state awareness of the Kincora abuse was going to be denied yet again. Because of this Colin Wallace declined to to be interviewed by HIA.4 However he did supply the inquiry with hundreds of pages of documents and some of his claims are discussed and dismissed in the HIA report.5
HIA held 223 days of public hearings between 13 January 2014 and 8 July 2016 and published its report on the day after the American presidential inauguration. This resulted in short pieces in the Guardian on page 14 and in the Independent on p. 22. Job done: report out and no-one paid any attention.
The following paragraphs are from chapter 3 of that report.6
para 391 We are satisfied that it was not until 1980 that the RUC Special Branch, MI5, the SIS and Army Intelligence became aware that [William] McGrath had been sexually abusing residents at Kincora, and they learnt of that when it became the
4 <http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/n...d/kincora- abuse-probe-disarray-as-second-witness-colin-wallace-rules-out- testifying-34622485.html>. One-time Tara member Roy Garland also declined to be interviewed by HIA for the same reason. His written statement to HIA rebuts much of what the inquiry said about him notably the claim that he was one of McGrath's sex partners and, like Wallace, he says that the British secret state knew about McGrath's activities in the 1970s. See <https://www.hiainquiry.org/ sites/hiainquiry/files/media-files/Roy%20Garland%20-%20KIN- 130010%20to%20130074_Redacted%20%282%29.pdf>.
5 <https://www.hiainquiry.org/>
6 <https://www.hiainquiry.org/sites/hiainqu...dia-files/ Chapter%203%20-%20Findings.pdf>
subject of public allegations and a police investigation was launched.
para 405 We do not regard Mr Wallace as truthful in his accounts of what he knew about sexual abuse in Kincora, or of what he did with that knowledge, between 1972 and 1974. In particular, for the reasons we have given, we do not accept that the critical document of 8 November 1974 was created at that date.
So there it is: the kernel of what the HIA had to discredit. In Volume 9, Kincora Boys' Home (Part 2), from para 482 onwards, the report works hard at rubbishing Wallace's 1974 memorandum which revealed institutional knowledge within the British secret state of McGrath's activities at Kincora and finally concludes its only option that Wallace fabricated it.
Colin Wallace issued the following statement to the media after the report's publication.
Although I initially offered to give evidence to the Inquiry, I later decided not to mainly on the grounds that the Government repeatedly refused to give it the same legal powers as the corresponding Inquiry in London. I believe that both the perception and the reality of the Government's decision is one of unfairness to the victims.
Despite my decision, I did, however, provide the Inquiry with 265 pages of comment and supporting documents, drawing attention to false or misleading information contained in the transcripts of the public hearings. My reason for doing so was to enable the Inquiry to investigate and corroborate the accuracy of my past comments about Kincora and related matters, and to provide the Inquiry with the opportunity to correct the relevant errors in the its published transcripts.
None of the information I provided to the Inquiry is new. Although some of it has not previously been in the
public domain, it has been in the possession of the Ministry of Defence and other Government agencies for many years and should have been made available by those authorities to the Inquiry. It should also have been made available by the authorities to previous Inquiries and the Government needs to explain why that did not happen.
Even more worrying, is the acknowledged fact that key Army Intelligence files relating to Tara and William McGrath appear to have gone missing after they were handed over by the Army to MI5 in 1989, prior to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's admission to Parliament (30 January 1990) that Ministers had inadvertently misled' Parliament about my case. There also appears to be no record whatsoever of what became of all the Clockwork Orange' project files which I handed over to my superiors when I left Army Headquarters in Lisburn in February 1975. Some of those files related to William McGrath. To make matters worse, it is now clear from the Inquiry's transcripts that a senior MI5 officer, Ian Cameron, falsely accused me of leaking' information to the press about William McGrath. His claim was that I did so without authority.
The MI5 claim is bizarre because, as my Army superior at the time has confirmed in the press, I was officially instructed by my superiors in Psy Ops, at the behest of Major General Peter Leng, to brief the press about McGrath as early as 1973, in a bid to draw media attention to his activities. I have no doubts whatsoever that because General Leng wanted the press to investigate McGrath, he had very good reasons for doing so and deserves credit for what he did.
It is also significant that the MI5 officer who accused me of leaking' information about McGrath to
the press later refused to be interviewed by the Terry Inquiry investigators about why he ordered Army Intelligence officer, Captain Brain Gemmell, to stop investigating William McGrath. Clearly, the Army and MI5 had very different agendas regarding McGrath and his activities.
The astonishing claim by the authorities, including the Intelligence Services, that they knew nothing about the allegations surrounding McGrath's sexual activities until 1980 is a total travesty. As my documents clearly show, it is simply not credible that I knew more about McGrath and his activities than the combined Intelligence community did in 1973/74. One must conclude, therefore, that the Intelligence Services did not tell the Inquiry all they knew about McGrath during the 1970s. Indeed, most of the information I possessed about McGrath in 1973/74 came from within the Intelligence community and was quite substantial. Moreover, my 1973 press briefing document clearly contains more information about McGrath than the Intelligence Services have claimed to the Inquiry that they possessed at that time!
Finally, to suggest that because I gave the press the exact postal address (including the street number of the property) and telephone number of the Kincora home, but did not actually include the name, Kincora', somehow invalidates my evidence, is an unacceptable attempt to avoid facing up to what I have been saying over the years. That information also shows that the claim made by the Intelligence Services to the Inquiry that they were not aware until 1980 of where McGrath worked is demonstrably false.
Overall, I believe the Inquiry has been a wasted opportunity to establish the full facts relating to this
matter and I feel the victims have been let down yet again, as they were by previous Inquiries.
In addition this press statement, Wallace has written a 45 page analysis and refutation of the sections of the HIA report about him. This is on the HIA site,7 which is in the ridiculous position of offering both its own report and analyses by Wallace and Roy Garland which refute large chunks of if it
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Slowly some of the facts are emerging. But the powerful Westminster paedo's continue their activities in the certain knowledge and that the British state will continue to cover it all up.
Quote:
MI5 files reveal Thatcher supported key ally over child sex abuse claims
MI5 files have revealed for the first time what many suspected. Margaret Thatcher was aware of alleged sexual offences by her Private Parliamentary Secretary Sir Peter Morrison yet chose to defend him.[/FONT] Testimony as well as documents MI5 have handed to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) suggest a rallying behind the Conservative minister despite concerns laid out about Morrison's "interest in small boys".[/FONT] Peter Morrison, Tory MP for Chester was a junior minister, then Conservative party deputy chairman before becoming Private Parliamentary Secretary to Margaret Thatcher in 1990.[/FONT] He was one of Thatcher's most faithful allies, persuading her to stand for the party leadership in 1975. Morrison was knighted in 1991 and died in 1995.[/FONT] The IICSA is probing how the Conservative Party and secret services dealt with allegations of child sex abuse made against Sir Peter Morrison. He was never charged with the allegations levelled against him.[/FONT] The MI5 files suggest then PM Thatcher knew of the allegations against him.[/FONT] In a memo from 1986, revealed to the inquiry yesterday, Eliza Manningham-Buller, who later became director general of MI5, wrote that she met Morrison and regarding the allegations against him, she reported that "the prime minister was aware of it and was supporting Peter."[/FONT] The memo also mentions his conversation with another member of Margaret Thatcher's cabinet, Sir Norman Tebbit a conversation Tebbit referred to shockingly on the BBC's Marr show years later. When asked if there was a "big political cover up" at the time, the former Chairman of the Conservative Party replied: "you didn't talk about those things."[/FONT]
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
The Facts:Sonia Poulton, a British journalist, social commentator, and filmmaker, has been investigating the dark web of pedophilia for years. Some of her research has been complied into a documentary called "Pedophiles In Parliament."
Reflect On:Evidence has been emerging for decades with regards to this type of activity in high profile places.' Why, only now, is the entire planet starting to wake up to this fact? Reflect on how much power and control these people have.
"They use all forms of persuasion to prevent people from speaking out, to silence people. Threats, intimidation, blackmail, financial deprivation. And all types of harassment such as put under intensive surveillance, telephone tapping, all of this. They pull out the stops and they have unlimited funds because those funds are supplied by the tax payer" Andrea Davison, Former Intelligence Agent (source)
Whilst the global press is focusing on Prince Andrew's alleged involvement with Jefferey Epstein's child trafficking sex ring, this may, in fact, actually pale in comparison to other criminal activity involving children by the hands of the British Establishment. Sonia Poulton, a British journalist, social commentator, and filmmaker, has been investigating the dark web of pedophilia for years that connects Margaret Thatcher, Sir' Edward Heath, David Cameron, Theresa May and Jeremey Corbyn to the cover-up (and for some, the actual facilitation) of sex crimes against children. It is thought that this cover-up, may have been going on for at least 30 years. Her documentary Paedophiles in Parliament' is a shocking expose which links many MP's to child abuse. Sonia exposes how the British Royal Family is also tied into this. <font color="#3D2546"><span style="font-family: Roboto"><span style="font-family: inherit">
Prominent Royal members were openly well-known friends to the now-deceased and notoriously depraved pedophile Jimmy Saville. Curiously, it is said that he had access to the Palace whenever he liked. With MI5 and Scotland Yard having the job of vetting' everyone around the Royals, it would have been known to them, that Jimmy Saville at the very least, had a very bad reputation and really was not royal' material. Yet, he had a very close relationship with Prince Charles, for decades. It is now alleged that there were at least 450 cases of abuse by the hands of Jimmy Saville and that 8 British police forces knew of this and did nothing about it. The news of his sick and cruel acts was only made widely known after he died. There is also a similar story in regards to Sir' Edward Heath, an ex-prime minister of the UK no less, who is also now known to have been an alleged pedophile. According to Anna Brees, Ex BBC Reporter, 40 people came forward to report that Edward Heath had sexually abused them. One of the victims, Michael Tarraga, UK, who tragically only has a few months to live due to severe COPD, claims he was bought and sold' for sex and was trafficked from several different foster homes he grew up in. He recently published the book Meat Rack Boy' detailing what had happened to him. The proceeds from his book go to helping others who have experienced horrific abused like he has. You can listen to a podcast with him where he explains how these rings operate here: Trevor Victor Norman Fortescue, CBE, also known known as Tim Fortescue, was a British politician. He was the Conservative Member of Parliament (MP) for Liverpool Garston from 1966 to 1974. Fortescue was appointed by Edward Heath as an assistant whip under Francis Pym, served as a senior whip, Lord Commissioner of the Treasury from 1971 until he resigned in September 1973. According to him, as stated in the documentary above:
For anyone with any sense, who was in trouble, would come to the whips and tell them the truth, and say now, I'm in a jam, can you help? It might be debt, it might be… a scandal involving small boys, or any kind of scandal in which, erm er, a member seemed likely to be mixed up in, they'd come and ask if we could help and if we could, we did. And we would do everything we can because we would store up brownie points… and if I mean, that sounds a pretty, pretty nasty reason, but it's one of the reasons because if we could get a chap out of trouble then, he will do as we ask forever more.
Lord Mountbatten, who was an Uncle to Prince Philip, and very close to Prince Charles, was allegedly assassinated in 1979 by the IRA. However, recently uncovered FBI files, which reference a 1944 interview with Elizabeth de la Poer Beresford, Baroness Decies, a friend of the royal family. The report stated; "She states that in these circles Lord Louis Mountbatten and his wife are considered persons of extremely low morals. She stated that Lord Louis Mountbatten was known to be a homosexual with a perversion for young boys," Lord Mountbatten was also good friends with Jimmy Saville. How convenient' that this only ever comes out after these people die, you might say. Jimmy is said to have not only been a vile abuser himself, but also a procurer of children to abuse for others. Who were these people that he helped bring innocent children to? This kind of thing has been floating around out there for decades. For example, a member of the Royal family was claimed to be part of a suspected pedophile ring under investigation by the police in the late 1980s, a former police officer has said. The former Metropolitan Police officer said he was told by a detective sergeant that the investigation into the ring, which was also claimed to include an MP, was shut down for national security reasons. "I was in a car with two other vice squad officers … The detective sergeant said he had just had a major child abuse investigation shut down by the CPS regarding a royal and an MP," he told the Sunday Mirror newspaper. "He did not mention names, but he said the CPS had said it was not in the public's interest because it could destabilise national security'." Peter McKelvie, a former child protection chief in the UK, gained attention when he claimed that senior politicians, military figures and even people linked to the Royal Family were among the alleged abusers. While working in Hereford and Worcester, he helped to convict notorious child abuser Peter Righton, who was once one of the country's most respected authorities on child care. This highlights a great point, and something that I've come across multiple times in my research. Many people who work for national child care protection programs are directly involved in this type of thing. McKelvie is one of many who told the world that these types of powerful VIP pedophile rings have been running in secrecy for multiple years. (source) Anna Brees was recently interviewed by Shaun Atwood, a London based activist during a true-crime podcast and said that she has received information on some current MP's who have been sexually harming boys. In another eye-opening interview, Shaun also spoke to an ex Scotland Yard Police Officer of 27 years, about how the police cover-up pedophile rings. Jon Wedger explains how easy it is for pedophiles in the UK to get around the law and gain access to victims through programs for helping' children with special needs or those in foster care. The fact that the most vulnerable children in society are easy prey for these sick individuals to get regular access to is deeply disturbing. Whilst this film certainly makes for uncomfortable viewing it is indeed very hard to fathom what happens to innocent children, especially by those that are supposed to care' for the public but this is perhaps one of the most important topics that we are facing today. In an era where corruption and power is at an all-time high, is this, in fact, the biggest cause as to what is holding us back from living in a free society? Is it time to connect the dots and see what is really behind this widespread corruption, and that is, the hidden in plain sight systematic abuse of children by the hands of the powerful and those that are meant to protect us. OUR INTERVIEW WITH A SURVIVOR OF CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING
Anneke Lucas is an author, speaker, advocate for child sex trafficking victims, founder of the non-profit organization Liberation Prison Yoga, and creator of the Unconditional Model. Her work is based off her 30-year journey to restore her mental and physical wellbeing after surviving some of the worst atrocities known to humankind before the age of 12. Sold as a young child into a murderous pedophile network by her family, she was rescued after nearly six years of abuse and torture. We recently conducted an interview with her. Below is a clip from the four part series, as it was a very long and detailed interview. You can access the full interview HERE on CETV, a platform we created to help combat internet censorship and allow us to continue to do our work and get the word out about various issues and topics.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=8971&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=8971&stc=1)
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=8972&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=8972&stc=1)
Paedophile who tried to snatch 14-year-old schoolgirl in the...
Paedophile ex-policeman wins six-figure compensation payout...
![[Image: 3D635E1300000578-4238188-image-a-23_1487450099174.jpg]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/18/20/3D635E1300000578-4238188-image-a-23_1487450099174.jpg)
![[Image: 3D635FBD00000578-4238188-image-a-30_1487451176466.jpg]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/18/20/3D635FBD00000578-4238188-image-a-30_1487451176466.jpg)
![[Image: 3D635E3D00000578-4238188-image-a-25_1487450625781.jpg]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/18/20/3D635E3D00000578-4238188-image-a-25_1487450625781.jpg)
![[Image: 3D635E4D00000578-4238188-image-a-26_1487450634771.jpg]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/18/20/3D635E4D00000578-4238188-image-a-26_1487450634771.jpg)
![[Image: 3D1E8F0C00000578-4238188-image-a-29_1487451087015.jpg]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/18/20/3D1E8F0C00000578-4238188-image-a-29_1487451087015.jpg)
![[Image: 3D635E3100000578-4238188-image-a-27_1487450788556.jpg]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/18/20/3D635E3100000578-4238188-image-a-27_1487450788556.jpg)
![[Image: 055C4852000005DC-4238188-image-a-28_1487450928945.jpg]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/18/20/055C4852000005DC-4238188-image-a-28_1487450928945.jpg)
![[Image: MI5.jpg]](https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/MI5.jpg)
![[Image: Margaret-Thatcher-1024x638.jpg]](https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Margaret-Thatcher-1024x638.jpg)
![[Image: 800px-Official_portrait_of_Lord_Armstron...8x1024.jpg]](https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/800px-Official_portrait_of_Lord_Armstrong_of_Ilminster_crop_2-768x1024.jpg)
Lord Armstrong of Ilminster © UK Parliament![[Image: maxresdefault-1280x640.jpg]](https://32pscm16mza81bp71x2anhjy-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/maxresdefault-1280x640.jpg)
![[Image: pixel.gif]](https://www.paypal.com/en_US/i/scr/pixel.gif){kind=tracking}