13-08-2010, 06:15 PM (This post was last modified: 17-08-2010, 08:40 PM by Matthew Lewis.)
Jack White Wrote:I know of nobody who studies chemtrails who suggests
that commercial airliners are used. There is NO evidence
suggesting this.
Whether you know of it or not, many do suggest that. Some "chemtrail" theorists have suggested the airlines are in on it. Many post pics and videos of aircraft with clear commercial markings or of types not used as tankers. Some have even compared the aircraft they were seeing with commercial flights referenced in programs like Flight Explorer or Flight Aware.
Jack White Wrote:Large unmarked tanker jets of the type
used for aerial refueling are used.
USAF tankers have either 3 or 4 engines. What about the thousands of pics and videos showing aircraft with TWO engines? Or the pics clearly showing aircraft with commercial markings? Or the pics showing 747's or Airbus aircraft?
Jack White Wrote:Attached is an alleged spray attachment, though most
chemtrails I have seen are twin sprays coming from the
wing/engine areas.
Quote:[size=12]I know of nobody who studies chemtrails who suggests
that commercial airliners are used. There is NO evidence
suggesting this.
[/SIZE] There is no evidence that non commercial aircraft are used either.
Quote:[size=12]Large unmarked tanker jets of the type
used for aerial refueling are used.
[/SIZE] Prove it. Give us one shred of evidence to prove it. So far all you have provided is conjecture and backyard observations from 35,000 feet away. Since these planes fly over your house almost daily it should be easy for you to prove your beliefs. Use your digital camera and take a series of stills while zooming in on the plane. That way we can see the chemtrail and the drab paint job on the plane. We don’t expect to read the tail numbers. But if you are correct then it should not have a Delta paint job.
Jack you didn't! I can't believe you posted that picture. You just shot your creditability in the leg not just the foot. That particular picture is at least 10 years old! It's a E-6 TACAMO dumping fuel. This model is used by the Navy for command and communications. It's a highly modified 707. the normal fuel dump ports had to be moved inboard due to the communications pods on the wing tips. There is no way you took this photo in the last week. I know you did not specifically state you took the photo but it is implied based on my request for a series of photos. I did a google search and typed in "dumping fuel pictures". Lo and behold there is your picture right at the top of the page. Check out these links. http://morningmusings.rendabrumbeloe.org...-fuel.aspx http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/ic/e...index.html
I did a little googling. Sam Kent and Matthew Lewis
show up on most all forums I could find regarding Chemtrails.
Their passion to debunk the obvious is baffling.
I notice that someone using the ID of Jack White posts on a lot of forums espousing chemtrails. Their passion to believe in something with no proof is baffling.
18-08-2010, 12:28 AM (This post was last modified: 18-08-2010, 12:47 AM by Matthew Lewis.)
Jack White Wrote:I did a little googling. Sam Kent and Matthew Lewis
show up on most all forums I could find regarding Chemtrails.
Their passion to debunk the obvious is baffling.
Jack
The obvious? Like posting a pic of a plane doing a fuel dump that is not a tanker, not unmarked, and not "chemtrailing"?
Is it a crime to post on a subject that I find interesting and happen to know something about the science?
But seriously Jack, whatever happened to attack the message, not the messenger?
Jack White Wrote:Fanatical defenders seem to have a hidden agenda.
Just a love of aviation and an abhorrence of ignorance.
yeah.... most lone nuts say the same... "just a love of aviation".... What we need is some lone nut originality. LMFAO!
That comment can be construed as calling someone in this thread a "nut" David. Just want to bring that to your attention since it would be against the rules at DPF.
