Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Aussie PM dumped by own party
#51
The New Warlord Of Oz

July 21, 2010 By John Pilger

John Pilger's ZSpace Page / ZSpace

The Order of Mates celebrated beside Sydney Harbour the other day. This is a venerable masonry in Australian political life that unites the Labor Party with the rich elite known as the big end of town. They shake hands, not hug, though the Silver Bodgie now hugs. In his prime, the Silver Bodgie, aka Bob Hawke or Hawkie, wore suits that shone, wide-bottomed trousers and shirts with the buttons undone. A bodgie was a Australian version of the 1950s English Teddy Boy and Hawke’s thick grey-black coiffure added inches to his abbreviated stature.

Hawke also talked out of the corner of his mouth in an accent that was said to be “ocker”, or working class, although he himself was of the middle class and Oxford educated. As president of the Australian Council of Trade Unions, his popularity rested on his reputation as a hard-drinking larrikin, an Australian sobriquet once prized almost as much as an imperial honour. For Hawke, it was the disguise of one whose heart belonged to the big end of town, who cooled the struggles of working Australians, during the rise to power of the new property sharks, minerals barons and tax avoiders.

Indeed, as Labor prime minister in the 1980s, Hawke and his treasurer Paul Keating eliminated the most equitable spread of personal income on earth: a model for the Blairites. And the great Mate across the Pacific loved Hawkie. Victor Marchetti, the CIA strategist who helped draft the treaty that gave America control over its most important spy base in the southern hemisphere, told me, “When Hawke came along … he immediately sent signals that he knew how the game was played and who was buttering his bread. He became very co-operative, and even obsequious.”

The party overlooking Sydney Harbour on 12 July was to launch a book by Hawke’s wife, Blanche d’Alpuget, whose effusions about the Silver Bodgie include his single-handed rescue of Nelson Mandela from apartheid’s clutches. A highlight of the occasion was the arrival of the brand new prime minister, Julia Gillard, who proclaimed Hawke her “role model” and the “gold standard” for running Australia.

This may help explain the extraordinary and brutal rise of Gillard. In 48 hours in June, she and Mates in Labor’s parliamentary caucus got rid of the elected prime minister, Kevin Rudd. Her weapons were Rudd’s slide in the opinion polls and the power and prize of Australia’s vast trove of minerals. To pay off the national debt, Rudd had decreed a modest special tax on the profits of giants like BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. The response was a vicious advertising campaign against the government and a threat to shut down mines.

Within days of her coup, Gillard, who was Rudd’s deputy, had reduced the new tax; and the companies’ campaign was called off. It was a repeat of Hawke’s capitulation to the mining companies in the 1980s when they threatened to bring down a state Labor government in Western Australia. Like her predecessors, Gillard is pursuing a landgrab of the one region of Australia, the Northern Territory, where Aboriginal Australians have land and mineral rights. The deceit is spectacular and historical. The government claims it is “protecting” black Australian children from “abuse” and “neglect” within their communities. Official statistics show that the incidence of child abuse is no different from that of white Australia and the true cause of Aboriginal suffering is a systemic colonial racism that denies housing, water, roads, adequate health care and schools to indigenous people and harasses and imprisons them at a rate greater than in South Africa under apartheid.

Since her coup, Gillard has reaffirmed this racism at the heart of policy-making. Australia takes fewer refugees than almost any country, yet Gillard is using their “threat” to outdo the hysterics of an especially primitive parliamentary opposition led by Tony Abbot, known as the “mad monk”. Gillard’s “hardline” on refugees has been welcomed by the openly racist former MP Pauline Hanson as “sweep[ing] political correctness from the debate”. Hanson’s One Nation Party is the equivalent of the white supremacist British National Party. Gillard, an immigrant from Wales, demanded that refugees heading for Australia be “processed” (dumped) in East Timor, an impoverished country whose genocidal occupation by Indonesia was backed by Australian governments. Now liberated, the East Timorese have read their massive, under-populated neighbour a moral lesson by saying no.

Many of the refugees come from Afghanistan which Australia invaded at Washington’s insistence. “Our national security is at stake in Afghanistan”, said Gillard on 5 July, linking a faraway tribal war and resistance to foreign invaders with three terrorist attacks in Indonesia in which Australians were killed. There is not a shred of evidence to support her statement. Australia’s security is probably unique; since 1915, an estimated 22 people have died as a result of politically motivated violence.

The new prime minister’s partner is a former hair products salesman called Tim Mathieson. This would be of no interest had he not been given the job of “Australia’s men’s health ambassador” by one of Gillard’s cabinet colleagues, the health minister, even though he had no experience in healthcare. Mathieson is now a “rising star” in real estate, thanks to one Albert Dadon, whose company is seeking planning permission for a contentious high rise development in Melbourne. Dadon can claim membership of the Order of Mates. As head of the Australia Israel Cultural Exchange, he arranges admiring tours of Israel for politicians and journalists. Gillard went on such a junket last year in the wake of Israel’s massacre of 1400 people in Gaza, mostly women and children. She who would be the first female prime minister of Australia drooled her uncritical support for their killers.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply
#52
It looks like the Australian media is supporting Abbott to win the election on August 21. The bookies still have the Labor Party as strong favorites, so I'm inclined to think Labor will still win, although in the final analysis it doesn't matter which group of talking heads is elected, because they are all going to answer to their corporate masters anyway.

One issue that does my head in is the incredibly misunderstood issue of Government (public) debt. The Conservatives alarmist TV Ads stating that public debt racked up by the Government will engulf and destroy us all are incredibly dishonest.

Australia's public debt currently sits around $50 billion. The Government's broadband rollout and other spending initiatives are expected to blow it out to about $90 billion by 2013.

However this amount pales in comparison to Australia's private debt, currently $1900 billion--forty times the size of the public debt level.

Private debt is comprised of household, personal and business debt. Household debt (86% of which is mortgage debt) comprises $1000 billion (one trillion) of the total private debt. $140 billion is personal debt and $750 billion is business debt.

It doesn't take an economic genius to see that our massive increase in private debt--in particular mortgage debt (it has increased from 20 to 80 percent of GDP in the last decade, I think) is the biggest economic problem the country faces.

Former PM John Howard irresponsibly encouraged this mortgage binge, and introduced the first home buyers grant to back it up. Thousands of people who couldn't afford it jumped on the mortgage bandwagon.

Now we're left with a property market so overheated that most people need to spend half or more of their income on rent or mortgage. With all that income tied up in housing obligations, the wider economy suffers.

When the housing bubble bursts and the foreclosures start mounting, those unfortunate people will be told by the media that the cause of all their problems was reckless Government debt, because of reckless Government spending.

Steve Keen's blogs were right all along.

http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/wp-co...igures.pdf

http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/
Reply
#53
Agreed Mark. I've been noticing this too. "The polls show that there would be a coalition win today" blah, blah. There is no way that Abbott could legitimately win given his generally being despised by almost all the people including half his party (except for those who answer polls apparently) but there sure is a push to make it look it aint so. :fight:
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply
#54
Magda Hassan Wrote:Agreed Mark. I've been noticing this too. "The polls show that there would be a coalition win today" blah, blah. There is no way that Abbott could legitimately win given his generally being despised by almost all the people including half his party (except for those who answer polls apparently) but there sure is a push to make it look it aint so. :fight:

Yeah. Abbott would be a scary result, with all those crazy nutcases on the front bench--not to mention Abbott himself. I might be proven wrong, but I can't believe the electorate would be stupid enough to elect a right wing conservative Government in the middle of a major deflationary downturn.

Of course, we live in an idiocracy.
Reply
#55
Thanks for those articles and websites, Ed, Magda and Mark. All good stuff.

Well it's election day today, and it's a very close result, with neither major party likely to be able to form a government without the cooperation of one or two independents or greens. Which may not be such a bad thing.

So sick of the election campaign, so glad it's over.
Reply
#56
Not everyone wanted to vote for Rio Tinto.
A shocking election campaign by both parties. How not to do it. Labor honchos have a lot to answer for their rolling of Rudd. Pleased the Greens did so well though.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply
#57
And they're obviously having a little joke with us - Idiocracy is the late night movie on one of the main tv channels this election night.
Reply
#58
Peter Dawson Wrote:Thanks for those articles and websites, Ed, Magda and Mark. All good stuff.

Well it's election day today, and it's a very close result, with neither major party likely to be able to form a government without the cooperation of one or two independents or greens. Which may not be such a bad thing.

So sick of the election campaign, so glad it's over.

73-72, 4 Independents and a Green in a 150 seat Lower House. Nine Greens in a 76 seat Senate. It's a great result from where I sit.

The two party system in Australia is as dead as a dodo--at last.

The conservatives are squealing about it. Piers Ackerman is calling for another election. It's very funny.
Reply
#59
Here is Wayne Swan having a funny handshake with Bob Katter.

How strange is that?
Reply
#60
Magda Hassan Wrote:A shocking election campaign by both parties. How not to do it. Labor honchos have a lot to answer for their rolling of Rudd.

Labor honchos were just following orders Magda. He insulted Israel remember?

The end of the two party system should be celebrated. Whatever the altenative, it can't be worse than the status quo.

I feel sorry for the US of A. The two party system is locked in there. They'll need a revolution to overthrow it.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Anonymous hactivists reveal files of corrupt governing party in Spain Magda Hassan 0 2,527 10-07-2013, 01:11 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Wikileaks Party now open for membership Magda Hassan 2 3,352 30-04-2013, 09:56 AM
Last Post: Coby Brendon
  Interesting speech at Green Party Convention Peter Lemkin 0 3,315 20-07-2012, 08:57 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  American Nazi Party gets own lobbyist. Magda Hassan 3 4,158 14-04-2012, 10:11 AM
Last Post: Jan Klimkowski
  Tea Party Plans Premeditated Felony Magda Hassan 0 2,384 12-11-2011, 09:35 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Italian post-fascists merge with Berlusconi's party Magda Hassan 2 3,731 29-10-2011, 10:19 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  New US party. American Third Position - Liberty Sovereignty Identity Magda Hassan 1 3,800 28-09-2011, 05:06 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Pirate Party enters legislature. Social Democrats win Berlin elections. Magda Hassan 0 3,216 19-09-2011, 10:14 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  The rent is too damn high party. Magda Hassan 2 3,086 20-10-2010, 07:09 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  "Imagine if the Tea Party Was Black" Austin Kelley 5 6,245 25-04-2010, 10:58 PM
Last Post: Keith Millea

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)