|
The JFK Plot: A Structural Model
|
30-12-2008, 07:52 PM
Quote:I notice Harriman's name is not mentioned.Family Of Secrets pg. 16: Quote:Understanding the role of Brown Brothers Harriman is central to understanding the Bush legacy and the vast, if underappreciated, influence of the Bushes' immediate circle.The key word here is "underappreciated." A more forceful case for this is made in Tarpley and Chaitkin's George Bush: the Unauthorized Biography. http://www.tarpley.net/bush1.htm
30-12-2008, 07:58 PM
Is Harriman the root of all evil? Not a chance.
Throw in his less pro-active business-partners/legacy-allies Rockefeller, Morgan and Warburg -- and we are indeed at the root of vast evil. 
30-12-2008, 09:36 PM
Correct (with a minor clarification; see below), Cliff.
But your latest statement is at variance with your previous characterizations of Harriman. I wouldn't describe the perceived difference between Harriman and the others you cite as being the former's "pro-active" status. Harriman was their front-of-the-house man.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave. -- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity. -- Graham Greene
31-12-2008, 04:20 AM
Cliff Varnell Wrote:Family Of Secrets pg. 16: As you know, I was referring to the fact that Harriman was not mentioned in the review posted by Dawn (post #37). I realise the Bush and Harriman families, and several others, were part of the military/intelligence network, oil plutocracy and the export of war for profit. For my part, I can't see GHWB as being a major sponsor of DP at age 39. I could be wrong, the evil of this crowd can't be underestimated. I've yet to see the strong case against Harriman as mentioned on this thread, but one must keep an open mind to any and all plausible possibilities.
31-12-2008, 09:43 AM
Agreed on GHWB.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave. -- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity. -- Graham Greene 
31-12-2008, 01:48 PM
Charles Drago Wrote:Agreed on GHWB. I agree and disagree. Agree that he is part of the evil, but that he was front and center takes him out of group A: they remain behind the curtain, running the show. However, can anyone comment on WHY he'd be briefed on the assassination the day after, at 39? Why he said he does not know where he was 11/22/63? What his relationship was with DeMohrenschildt? The Bush crime family is tied to all that is wrong with this country, imho. Dawn
31-12-2008, 05:56 PM
Dawn Meredith Wrote:However, can anyone comment on WHY he'd be briefed on the assassination the day after, at 39? Two reasons: To spread guilt by association to those already around him, and to incriminate him for future blackmail purposes. Dawn Meredith Wrote:Why he said he does not know where he was 11/22/63? Two reasons: To indicate that his whereabouts that day are irrelevant to the murder, and because in this instance it's apparently too complicated and dangerous to make up an alibi. Dawn Meredith Wrote:What his relationship was with DeMohrenschildt? GDM's function, in my opinion, was to link LHO to false sponsors.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave. -- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity. -- Graham Greene
01-01-2009, 02:04 AM
Charles Drago Wrote:Happy New Year, my friend. Happy New Year, Charles -- and all our friends here at DP Forum! I look forward to continuing our discussions in 09 -- be safe, ya'all!
06-01-2009, 02:20 AM
Dawn Meredith Wrote:... Thanks for the review Dawn. I'm eager to read the book but I must say I'm stunned that Prescott would get a pass. Prescott write a letter to Allen Dulles' wife expressing rage at JFK and RFK over the Bay of Pigs "fiasco" and stating "I have never forgiven them." (See attachment.) According to http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/bush.htm the letter was written in 1968, after RFK was killed. I don't understand how the Bush dynasty story, or even the JFK assassination story, can be told without considerable focus on Prescott Bush.
06-01-2009, 02:30 PM
Myra:
Can't read the letter, even when I click on it it is way too small. Dawn |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
