"Mike Rago" the entity --

[Greg Burnham]

Mike Rago is of no consequence.

I have butted heads with him numerous times on Lancer.
His photo interpretation skills are sadly lacking.


http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard...pic_page=3

Hi Robin,

Perhaps you are right and he is of no consequence. But he sure tries to make a lot of noise. And he has "signature" to boot. We shall see.

[Charles Drago]

Mike Rago is of no consequence.

I have butted heads with him numerous times on Lancer.
His photo interpretation skills are sadly lacking.


http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard...pic_page=3

Here's what is of consequence:

1. The policy of what for better or worse is a "signature" JFK assassination forum that permits and even encourages hostile penetrations.

2. The all but total lack of evidence suggesting that otherwise intelligent, creative, noble JFK investigators who regularly post on EF have developed the deep political skill sets necessary to recognize and blunt said penetrations. How else do we account for the eagerness of so many of our valued EF comrades to engage "Rago" and, before him, "Cinque" -- not to mention the likes of "Colby"?

3. It was left to Greg Burnham and to this correspondent to declare the obvious regarding the latest attack on EF. And no, I cannot, in good conscience and sound mind, agree that this is simply a case of an innocent "Rago's" "photo interpretation skills [being] sadly lacking."

Don't dismiss this episode. See it within the context of "Cinque" and "Colby" and God knows how many other hostile agents being given free rein at EF. See it within the context of the upcoming 50th JFK anniversary. See it as a pattern that is certain to intensify over the next 15 months.

[Robin Unger]

Rago was a rampant thread opener even when he was on Lancer.
some days he would open 5 or 6 threads at once, taking over the whole forum.

His tactics on Ed Forum still appears to be the same as he did on Lancer.

He is an attention seeker who pretends to know everything about everything.
when in fact he knows very little about anything.

That us just my opinion, after dealing with him on the various forums he has been banned from
over the last 2-years.

[Charles Drago]

Rago was a rampant thread opener even when he was on Lancer.
some days he would open 5 or 6 threads at once, taking over the whole forum.

His tactics on Ed Forum still appears to be the same as he did on Lancer.

He is an attention seeker who pretends to know everything about everything.
when in fact he knows very little about anything.

That us just my opinion, after dealing with him on the various forums he has been banned from
over the last 2-years.

i respect your opinions, Robin. Always have, even when, as is now the case, we disagree.

Meanwhile, "Rago" is blathering away, no one in a position of authority at EF seems the least bit perturbed about "his" rule-shattering use of at least one false identity, and good men and women are wasting bandwidth on a fool's errand.

[Robin Unger]

Quote:

this is simply a case of an innocent "Rago's" "photo interpretation skills [being] sadly lacking.


Charles i didn't say he was innocent.

I said he was of no consequence, as in ( he doesn't warrant the attention that is being paid to him )
his GIANT EGO will just lap that up.

I'm sure that he loves the fact that people on this forum are discussing him.

Quote:

and good men and women are wasting bandwidth on a fool's errand.



Yes Charles.

On that we do agree.

[Charles Drago]

Quote:

this is simply a case of an innocent "Rago's" "photo interpretation skills [being] sadly lacking.


Charles i didn't say he was innocent.

I said he was of no consequence, as in ( he doesn't warrant the attention that is being paid to him )
his GIANT EGO will just lap that up.

I'm sure that he loves the fact that people on this forum are discussing him.

Quote:

and good men and women are wasting bandwidth on a fool's errand.



Yes Charles.

On that we do agree.

I know what you wrote, Robin. I'm not sure you do. Because if "Rago" is not innocent, then by definition "he" is of consequence.

Get it?

The critical difference, Robin, is that here at DPF we're exploiting the inherent weakness of disinformation operations -- their weakness to exposure by equal or superior opponents willing to counterattack.

EF is entertaining "Rago" and his ilk.

DPF is exposing and exploiting "Rago" and his ilk.

There is a world of difference, if only you could see it.

[Charles Drago]

Let's close this little chapter of our Disinformation 101 textbook by noting how, at the EF Swamp, yet another of its short bus irregulars has played directly into the hands of the "Rago"/"Cinque" provocations' designers.

A certain David Andrews begins his latest support of the operation with this little gem:

"Rago/Ringler/Drago/Impkin!! In Hell, Jim Angleton is laughing uncontrollably over his beaker of hot gin."

I assume that "Impkin" is his half-witted swipe at our own Peter Lemkin -- who was savagely victimized by the corrupt, dishonest EF masters who are being served by Andrews.

Anyway ... this fool aids and abets the name confusion aspect of the operation even as he continues the dialogue with "Rago."

Mother is laughing, to be sure.

At David Andrews and the rest of the Global Village idiots.

[Peter Lemkin]

Let's close this little chapter of our Disinformation 101 textbook by noting how, at the EF Swamp, yet another of its short bus irregulars has played directly into the hands of the "Rago"/"Cinque" provocations' designers.

A certain David Andrews begins his latest support of the operation with this little gem:

"Rago/Ringler/Drago/Impkin!! In Hell, Jim Angleton is laughing uncontrollably over his beaker of hot gin."

I assume that "Impkin" is his half-witted swipe at our own Peter Lemkin -- who was savagely victimized by the corrupt, dishonest EF masters who are being served by Andrews.

Hmmmmmm......could well be......and yet the average EF member continues on, as if nothing was amiss in their little 'world' nor with their petty little 'forum'. The pathology and metastasis there is extreme, [pathological / deceptive /dangerous] IMO.

[Keith Millea]

Charles,I believe the Impkin is short for Simpkin.

[Charles Drago]

Charles,I believe the Impkin is short for Simpkin.

Why?