Granted not all had a deep political analysis - but despite that, the resistance to what Trumpf and his cronies/crooks/bigots/and other criminals who care not for the People - they got it and they said it loud!
some of the best speeches I haven't yet found individually. Youtube is interested only in posting those of known celebs. However, on the full five and a half hour versions I posted you can find all the more political speeches from activists of various sorts.
Very bad signs Peter but all this apparatus has been put in place years before Trump even ran for office. Naturally he will use it but who gave him the means?
Now Trump is not going to release his taxes as he previously said. Wikileaks has put out another call for some one to leak them. They have been calling for them since before the election. And once received and verified they will publish. Not winning any friends in the new administration.
Magda Hassan Wrote:Very bad signs Peter but all this apparatus has been put in place years before Trump even ran for office. Naturally he will use it but who gave him the means?
I quite agree....the apparatus that Trumpf will use has been built up since WW2 - and some from even before that. He is but the endpoint in a long 'trail of tears' from a half-ass system to the final stages of a police state and ever-bloming fascism - LONG time in the making. My worry, however, is that soon under him, in response to opposition in the streets he will declare martial law or some such evil. From there on out things become a lot more difficult and deadly. His administration will use much less restraint. If Obama had hundreds of drone strikes, Trumpf will use thousands...if one is a whisleblower and caught now, it will be even worse than under Obama.....and so on....
This is a HUGE change for the negative; not just a little more change in the direction we've long been going. IMO. First we have to deal with the visible government - then to deal with the hidden structures [which most don't even see nor know about]. With Trumpf they will be much more visible, however.
The Women's March was very hopeful, and if that could be kept up as local action for a year or more, Trumpf would be unable to do as much as planned and in two years the Congress could have most of his supporters removed. No, Trump is not the first big problem - he is the end game of a process - but sad to see its day 'dawn'.
Much work to do - and it will not be easy nor fun! At least the next period of time will not be dull! Not dull at all!
I know this will sound incredibly cynical and passe, and I had considered not saying it. But it's relevant, I think.
Quote:The psychological rule says that when an inner situation is not made conscious, it happens outside, as fate. That is to say, when the individual remains undivided and does not become conscious of his inner opposite, the world must perforce act out the conflict and be torn into opposing halves.
Carl Jung
Collected Works 9ii
AION
Paragraph 126
I've just checked the para in Aion 9ii and it's actually a fairly lengthy para - as they tended to be in Jung's day - but for me it is telling and highly relevant to what we see unfolding.
Quote:Today, as never before, humanity is split into two apparently irreconcilable halves. The psychological rule says that when an inner situation is not made conscious, it happens outside, as fate. That is to say, when the individual remains undivided and does not become conscious of his inner opposite, the world must perforce act out the conflict and be torn into opposing halves.
I'll get my coat.
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Payments from foreign powers to Trump firms violate constitution lawsuit
Impending suit by a legal watchdog accuses newly inaugurated president of violating US constitution's emoluments clause
[URL="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/23/payments-from-foreign-powers-to-trump-firms-violate-constitution-lawsuit#img-1"]
[/URL]
Trump's businesses does deals with countries including China, India, Indonesia and the Philippines, the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington said. Photograph: Rex/ShutterstockReuters in Washington DC
Monday 23 January 2017 08.12 GMT
A US legal watchdog is to file a lawsuit accusing President Donald Trump ofviolating the US constitution by allowing his businesses to accept payments from foreign governments.
The lawsuit, brought by the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, will allege that the constitution's emoluments clause forbids payments to Trump's businesses. It will seek a court order on Monday forbidding Trump from accepting such payments, said Deepak Gupta, one of the lawyers working on the case.
Trump does business with countries including China, India, Indonesia and the Philippines, the group noted in a statement.
"When Trump the president sits down to negotiate trade deals with these countries, the American people will have no way of knowing whether he will also be thinking about the profits of Trump the businessman," it said.
A Trump representative referred questions to a law firm representing the president on ethics matters.
"We do not comment on our clients or the work we do for them," said the representative of the firm, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius.
The case is part of a wave of litigation expected to be filed against Trump by liberal advocacy groups. It will be filed in a Manhattan federal court, Gupta said, and attorneys for the plaintiffs will include Richard Painter, a former ethics lawyer in George W Bush's White House.
"This is purely harassment for political gain," he told the newspaper.Trump's son Eric, an executive vice-president of the Trump Organization, told the NYT on Sunday that the company had taken more steps than required by law to avoid any possible legal exposure, such as agreeing to donate any profits collected at Trump-owned hotels that come from foreign government guests to the US Treasury.
How is this different to the Clinton Foundation and Saudi and Qatari and other donations and pay for play?