Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Declassified: The CIA "Oswald" and Mexico City
#37
More incriminating stuff on Goodpasture:

This is not to say the plot was perfect. It wasn't. As Newman notes, the alleged Oswald tapes had to be made to disappear. Since it was not Oswald's voice on them, it threatened to expose the plot. Only the transcripts could be allowed to survive. But as CIA officer John Scelso noted in an internal memo, a copy of the October 1st intercept on Oswald had been discovered after the assassination.[SUP]187[/SUP] Shortly afterward, Scelso would be removed from his duties as liaison to the Warren Commission from the CIA. (He eventually retired early.) Richard Helms would replace him with James Angleton. Who, of course, knew exactly what to send the Commission about Oswald and what not to send. But the cover-up about the existence of the tapes after the assassination was put in place earlier by the trusty Goodpasture. On the afternoon of 11/23 she sent out a cable stating that a voice comparison between two of the alleged Oswald calls had not been made at the time of Oswald's visit because the tape of the 9/28 call had been erased before the tape of the 10/1 call was received.[SUP]188[/SUP] This is utter hogwash. As the Lopez Report establishes, the tapes were kept for ten days before being reused.[SUP]189[/SUP] And further, as Newman noted at a conference at Duquesne University in 2003, there was a voice comparison made and Goodpasture knew it. Further, it is preposterous to state that a tape would be recycled in a matter of 72 hours over a weekend.[SUP]190[/SUP] The disposal routine was never that fast, because it would not allow enough time for everything to be heard.



But Goodpasture then surpassed this first deception by sending out another cable on the 24th saying that all the tapes had been erased.[SUP]191[/SUP] How do we know this was a deception? Because Goodpasture, when challenged by Jeremy Gunn of the ARRB on this point, admitted that a tape dub had been sent to the Texas border on the night of the assassination. This was done through FBI agent Eldon Rudd, Hoover's attaché to the embassy.[SUP]192[/SUP] Rudd later became a Congressman. Apparently, aware of that he was caught up in, he vehemently opposed the creation of the HSCA and refused to testify before the Committee.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Declassified: The CIA "Oswald" and Mexico City - by Jim DiEugenio - 23-06-2015, 01:26 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Aaron Sharpe: Oswald's Exiting The Depository Brian Doyle 0 1,392 06-05-2025, 05:42 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  If the case against Oswald was legitimate Gil Jesus 0 1,385 04-07-2024, 12:11 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Government's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part III Gil Jesus 0 1,643 10-12-2023, 12:08 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Govenment's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part II Gil Jesus 1 1,870 28-11-2023, 03:36 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Why the Government's case against Oswald is BS --- Part I Gil Jesus 1 2,065 15-11-2023, 04:55 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Thomas Kelley reports Oswald said he did not view parade Richard Gilbride 1 1,979 26-09-2023, 04:31 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Evidence of Witness Tampering in the case against Oswald Gil Jesus 0 1,886 28-07-2023, 11:31 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  The REAL reason Oswald went to Irving on 11.21.63 Gil Jesus 1 2,290 15-06-2023, 03:46 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Conclusion Gil Jesus 1 2,367 01-04-2023, 04:23 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Part IV Gil Jesus 0 1,860 26-03-2023, 02:10 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)