28-06-2015, 12:57 AM
Let's talk a bit about Phillips and Oswald to point up another oddity with the "marked cards" theory.
Prior to the whole Mexico City escapade, Oswald was in the Dallas/ Fort Worth area, and then New Orleans. And there is some evidence that he actually did some leafleting in Dallas, before he went to the Crescent City. But once he was in New Orleans, there is little doubt that he went into high gear as an agent provocateur. At first, it was kind of underground and low key; then he went into high gear by leafleting in public. This culminated in the altercation with Bringuier, the photos and films of him that were taken, the court appearance, and Oswald pleading guilty, even though he was not the perpetrator.
Now, let us count the ways that Phillips was familiar with both Oswald, and Banister's operation.
In 1961, the evidence indicates that Phillips was in New Orleans to help prepare for a city wide telethon to raise funds for the anti Castro cause; and he met with Arcacha Smith and Banister at 544 Camp Street. (Destiny Betrayed, Second Edition, p. 105)
The evidence indicates that, after Kennedy cut off funding for the exiles, Phillips raised money from some wealthy Texans to help construct a CIA training camp at Lacombe, LA. When Bob Tanenbaum was counsel for the HSCA, he saw a film of exile training, likely from this camp. In it were Banister, Oswald, and Phillips. He had certain witnesses verify their presence there. (ibid, p. 116)
David Phillips, along with James McCord, was running the CIA's anti-FPCC program in 1963. (ibid, p. 158) Of which, Oswald had to be a part of from what he was doing in New Orleans. In fact, Phillips probably supplied Banister with the Corliss Lamont pamphlet from 1961 that the CIA had ordered at that time. (ibid)
As everyone and their mom knows, Veciana saw Phillips with Oswald in the late summer of 1963 in Dallas at the Southland Center.
This is all important because it all happened before the whole alleged "Oswald in Mexico" occurrence. But my point is this: Does anyone think that Phillips did not know who Oswald was by late August of 1963, and what he looked like? I mean I sure as heck think he did know. How can one deny the totality of this evidence?
Now, considering that Eddie Lopez told me that Goodpasture took care of the Phillips operations when he was not there, what is the probability that he would not have shown her a likeness before he left, or that she would have not have called him once she heard his name?
To me, the probability is about less than five per cent.
This is why I do not buy all this innocent groping around in the dark down in MC, which is what the "marked card" thesis holds to the the case.
Prior to the whole Mexico City escapade, Oswald was in the Dallas/ Fort Worth area, and then New Orleans. And there is some evidence that he actually did some leafleting in Dallas, before he went to the Crescent City. But once he was in New Orleans, there is little doubt that he went into high gear as an agent provocateur. At first, it was kind of underground and low key; then he went into high gear by leafleting in public. This culminated in the altercation with Bringuier, the photos and films of him that were taken, the court appearance, and Oswald pleading guilty, even though he was not the perpetrator.
Now, let us count the ways that Phillips was familiar with both Oswald, and Banister's operation.
In 1961, the evidence indicates that Phillips was in New Orleans to help prepare for a city wide telethon to raise funds for the anti Castro cause; and he met with Arcacha Smith and Banister at 544 Camp Street. (Destiny Betrayed, Second Edition, p. 105)
The evidence indicates that, after Kennedy cut off funding for the exiles, Phillips raised money from some wealthy Texans to help construct a CIA training camp at Lacombe, LA. When Bob Tanenbaum was counsel for the HSCA, he saw a film of exile training, likely from this camp. In it were Banister, Oswald, and Phillips. He had certain witnesses verify their presence there. (ibid, p. 116)
David Phillips, along with James McCord, was running the CIA's anti-FPCC program in 1963. (ibid, p. 158) Of which, Oswald had to be a part of from what he was doing in New Orleans. In fact, Phillips probably supplied Banister with the Corliss Lamont pamphlet from 1961 that the CIA had ordered at that time. (ibid)
As everyone and their mom knows, Veciana saw Phillips with Oswald in the late summer of 1963 in Dallas at the Southland Center.
This is all important because it all happened before the whole alleged "Oswald in Mexico" occurrence. But my point is this: Does anyone think that Phillips did not know who Oswald was by late August of 1963, and what he looked like? I mean I sure as heck think he did know. How can one deny the totality of this evidence?
Now, considering that Eddie Lopez told me that Goodpasture took care of the Phillips operations when he was not there, what is the probability that he would not have shown her a likeness before he left, or that she would have not have called him once she heard his name?
To me, the probability is about less than five per cent.
This is why I do not buy all this innocent groping around in the dark down in MC, which is what the "marked card" thesis holds to the the case.