11-07-2015, 05:56 PM
As I understood it, Osborne used Bowen's name as an alias yet there indeed was a real Bowen.
Yet obviously if he died in 1962, there were not two of them during the WCR investigation.
Osborne/Bowen was a con man, from what I knew, so changing his identity or dates related would be to hide himself in plain sight.
I'm not sure of course... what I do know is that this man contradicts McFarland and the Aussie girls when he said there were no other "English speaking" people on that bus, that the man next to him with a zippered bag was not Oswald.
The WCR only uses the name OSBORNE, yet all the evidence says BOWEN... If he was "connected" to the FBI/CIA then why contradict the other witnesses who put him on the bus he needs to be on?
This the CIA playing games with the FBI?
Yet obviously if he died in 1962, there were not two of them during the WCR investigation.
Osborne/Bowen was a con man, from what I knew, so changing his identity or dates related would be to hide himself in plain sight.
I'm not sure of course... what I do know is that this man contradicts McFarland and the Aussie girls when he said there were no other "English speaking" people on that bus, that the man next to him with a zippered bag was not Oswald.
The WCR only uses the name OSBORNE, yet all the evidence says BOWEN... If he was "connected" to the FBI/CIA then why contradict the other witnesses who put him on the bus he needs to be on?
This the CIA playing games with the FBI?
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter