19-07-2015, 09:02 AM
From Duncan's forum--it could only be on his site:
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]From the merely sophomoric rubes who called him Dunkel (as if no public figure had ever changed his/her name in the history of mankind), to the more heinous bleating paranoids who claimed he was the all-powerful Wizard of Disinformation, shame on every one of you. I'm specifically calling out the histrionic human melodrama that is David Josephs, the pathetically withering, nonstop Insult Machine that is Jim DiEugenio, the somehow-passed-the-bar ninny Dawn Meredith (correspondence course?), the perpetually drunkish cartoon David Healy, the dreaded, lonely egomaniac Charles Drago, the indecipherable Phil Dragoo, and the posing, holier-than-everyone-else Greg Burnham.
There are many more out there, of course, but these are the standard bearers of endless, disgusting attacks on a guy who became a Hitlerian-type of enemy to them simply because he changed his mind on a few issues. He parted company, first, from some of the more ridiculous conspiracy theories. And as time went by, he (more so than probably 99.999 percent of researchers) was privy to data that convinced him that most of the rest of the theories were hogwash too.
He left the door open and never stopped researching. He believed in conspiracy. That was never good enough for the swill-slingers. He committed heresy, and then topped it off by actually earning a salary for his work at the Museum.
When Bugliosi died, that smug jerk Burnham ran a headline that said something like "Dead Bug" - and then facetiously claimed he meant no insult to the recently departed VB. Just like a kid who throws rocks and then runs behind mama's skirt.
I'm sure he, and his ilk, will outdo each other, rushing to characterize Gary in the darkest way possible, especially now that he's dead and can't respond. Not that responding would have been possible with this crowd - they make damn sure no alternative views are heard.
But reasonable folks - and there are many in the JFK community - know full well what kinds of acidic people you really are. You will continue to move further and further to the fringes, certain of your 'truth' - and you will convince no one.
You're all horrible people. Again, shame on you.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Wow, can you imagine what this guy will write when McAdams passes?
He will literally be weeping.
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]From the merely sophomoric rubes who called him Dunkel (as if no public figure had ever changed his/her name in the history of mankind), to the more heinous bleating paranoids who claimed he was the all-powerful Wizard of Disinformation, shame on every one of you. I'm specifically calling out the histrionic human melodrama that is David Josephs, the pathetically withering, nonstop Insult Machine that is Jim DiEugenio, the somehow-passed-the-bar ninny Dawn Meredith (correspondence course?), the perpetually drunkish cartoon David Healy, the dreaded, lonely egomaniac Charles Drago, the indecipherable Phil Dragoo, and the posing, holier-than-everyone-else Greg Burnham.
There are many more out there, of course, but these are the standard bearers of endless, disgusting attacks on a guy who became a Hitlerian-type of enemy to them simply because he changed his mind on a few issues. He parted company, first, from some of the more ridiculous conspiracy theories. And as time went by, he (more so than probably 99.999 percent of researchers) was privy to data that convinced him that most of the rest of the theories were hogwash too.
He left the door open and never stopped researching. He believed in conspiracy. That was never good enough for the swill-slingers. He committed heresy, and then topped it off by actually earning a salary for his work at the Museum.
When Bugliosi died, that smug jerk Burnham ran a headline that said something like "Dead Bug" - and then facetiously claimed he meant no insult to the recently departed VB. Just like a kid who throws rocks and then runs behind mama's skirt.
I'm sure he, and his ilk, will outdo each other, rushing to characterize Gary in the darkest way possible, especially now that he's dead and can't respond. Not that responding would have been possible with this crowd - they make damn sure no alternative views are heard.
But reasonable folks - and there are many in the JFK community - know full well what kinds of acidic people you really are. You will continue to move further and further to the fringes, certain of your 'truth' - and you will convince no one.
You're all horrible people. Again, shame on you.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Wow, can you imagine what this guy will write when McAdams passes?
He will literally be weeping.