Two new articles - Hopsicker and Hicks on Jeb Bush and the 9/11 cover-up

[R.K. Locke]

Hopsicker has been LIHOP for a while, and I doubt he's ever looked too closely at the building evidence. His work remains very valuable however, and I honestly think the movement would benefit if a few more activists would put down their petitions and footage of Building 7 and dug into some of the leads that Hopsicker uncovered in Florida.

Jeb airlifted the documents from Huffman on September 12th. What was the big hurry? The answer seems obvious, but itself poses a question that I'm not sure many have considered. If Jeb moved to courier those documents out of there on September 12th, was he unaware who the hijackers were until FBI 'leads' (and obviously those had been prepped to spring on the public beforehand) pointed to that same group of people on 9/11?

Hopsicker's work points towards links between the 'hijackers' and the drug trade. Was that group chosen to be the patsies simply because the various Iran-Contra and CIA figures who were protecting the drug trade would move heaven and earth to prevent any cracks developing in the official story, to avoid anyone looking deeper into who those people were, and what they were linked to? Any federal officials linked with the previous cover-ups of the drug trade would be very compliant in preventing any further investigation into that same milieu. I recall Lee Oswald was a useful patsy as his various CIA and FBI links were enough to encourage a complicated cover-up from day one. The 9/11 'hijackers' - before they participated in what was probably, to some of them, a much anticipated 'drill' with a big payday promised at the end of it - might have served a similar purpose.

I agree. Hopsicker's work is very valuable, irrespective of his (highly) dubious overall opinion of 9/11. I have posted his articles on here in the past. I also agree that the question of how the buildings fell is largely a distraction - especially since the physical evidence has been destroyed. It's the same problem that we still face with the Kennedy case 50+ years later. It's not that there is nothing to be learned from studying the building collapses, but there are clearly more fruitful avenues that could be pursued where the evidence is still extant.