11-12-2015, 12:48 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-12-2015, 06:10 AM by Albert Doyle.)
I don't think Scully realizes that while showing us a Missouri professor's academic work that critiques Money Order endorsement practices, saying they will soon be as necessary as incantations, in actuality the ensuing banking practices that followed actually trended towards all Money Orders and checks receiving automatic endorsement stamping. I don't think Scully realizes that while he thinks he has shown a source that suggests endorsements would be done away with like primitive tribal practices, in reality what occurred was endorsements became universal and were stamped on all check and Money Order exchanges. This is typical of Scully who often attempts to impress the reader with esoteric references, however, as I have shown here, he uses those references to defy context and try to suggest untruths that are the opposite of what even his own sources show.
If you read Scully and Von Pein they offer references that suggest banks were moving towards blank, unendorsed checks and Money Orders in bulk and cash letter transfers, but what actually happened is modernization and computer technology ended up endorsing all such instruments with quick strip stamping. The endorsement practice that eventually became the norm 100% endorses Larsen.
.
If you read Scully and Von Pein they offer references that suggest banks were moving towards blank, unendorsed checks and Money Orders in bulk and cash letter transfers, but what actually happened is modernization and computer technology ended up endorsing all such instruments with quick strip stamping. The endorsement practice that eventually became the norm 100% endorses Larsen.
.

