FBI's Pants on Fire!

[David Josephs]

Thanks Tom- your indepth research proving that men by these names existed and were connected to the Records center is impressive as usual.

Please provide the corroboration that the people who met with and gave SA PARKER the PMO at 10:10 EST were the two men you biographed above... and that the men above - if the same as those on 11/23 - were also not assets for American intelligence.

And thanks for the Marks testimony - adds further proof the PMO had to be processed by the FRB of Chicago.

So let's look closely at the VERANT-DUGGINS-MARKS-JACKSON-PARKER acquisition as compared to the other 3 acquisitions of that same PMO that day.

Do you have anything to offer as to why these upstanding citizens and employees of the Fed Records Center would produce a PMO which was never processed thru the US Banking system and found 3 other times earlier that day?


------------------------------------------

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html...9&tab=page is part of the SS report which states that Postal Inspector Verant contacts Marks to initiate a search. Yes - a Finance Officer and Mr. Jackson, a Management Analyst are the two people chosen to go into the Fed Records Center on a Saturday evening and retreive the PMO.

Marks tells Verant that Deputy Chief Duggins called him an hour ago with the same request. This occurs at 9pm EST (all the times in my PMO timeline are EST)
Meaning that by 8pm EST Duggins had called MARKS again - must have been an important guy - who told VERANT that the search had already begun.

Also at 9pm EST SS SAIC Kroz is called in Kansas City (8pm local KC) and is informed the PMO has been found.
We must remember that Holmes has already gone thru this process - found the PMO stub and has gotten word it's been recoved mid-morning on Saturday, 9 hours before this happens

The report above goes on to say that the reporting agent, SA BURKE, PARKER and/or GRIMES tells Marks that there has been some trouble getting the computers "up to operational level" and needs 15 more minutes before they could locate the PMO given the information SS Chief PATERNI provided... at 8:30pm EST.

Who might that be Tom? Who was bringing the computers up late Sat night in order to find something for the Secret Service which had already been found. And where does Chief PATERNI get the information to convey to GAIGLAIN? https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html...8&tab=page

He provides every bit of info needed to create the PMO - on page 119 of this amazing document we learn that PI Lloyd Stevens in FORT WORTH provides the PMO details as a result of a discussion with Don DUGGINS... at 9:35pm EST (8:30 in KC) Marks claims he has the PMO - even though is had been found and bropuhg to the SS office in both Chicago and DC.

One wonders how KROZ in Kansas City can be told at 8pm local time or 9pm EST that the PMO has been found, when by 9pm EST Marks has not yet gone to the Records Center. The following linked page is the end of a SS report from Chicago showing the 7:55 and 8pm local times for when KROZ learns this info. https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html...4&tab=page

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html...9&tab=page this page is the cover page of the same report and states that "the money order involved was recovered by Postal Inspectors in Kansas City and forwarded to the Asst Chief's Office of this Service"




So help me out here Tom... we have 4 instances of finding the PMO

1. Holmes is told the PMO has been found by midday 11/23 due to his own PMO stub finding efforts
   
2. The Secret Service finds the PMO in Kansas City - where at 7:30pm local time Post Office Inspectors report they think the PMO would be wsent to KC and they were attempting to find it already
   
3. KROZ is called and told it was found in DC at 8pm local 9pm EST
   
4. MARKS hands a PMO to SS SA PARKER supposedly obtained by JACKSON at 10:10pm EST Sat night.
   

So Tom - when I state that we don't know if the men involved were actually Marks and Jackson since noone it seems took any time to corroborate that information. I gather, if you hade found either Marks or Jackson's statements or affidavits to the FBI and WC that they indeed did as was reported about them - you would have posted them.

But you didn't. So, until you can prove who the men were, their involvement in this PMO charade puts a much brighter light on the possibility they were not who they said they were but assisting the key players with an item of evidence that never existed in the first place.

DJ