FBI's Pants on Fire!

[Tom Scully]

...........
And thanks for the Marks testimony - adds further proof the PMO had to be processed by the FRB of Chicago.

...................
But you didn't. So, until you can prove who the men were, their involvement in this PMO charade puts a much brighter light on the possibility they were not who they said they were but assisting the key players with an item of evidence that never existed in the first place.

DJ

David,
You make it obvious you are in over your head or have a reading comprehension problem. You've made extraordinary claims, (you can attempt to prove them, yourself) compared to the statement of the SS agent who received the $21.45 postal money order, as he stated in his official report, from J Harold Marks and Robert H Jackson.:
http://maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docI...%20jackson
He offered their initials on the back of said money order, and his relevant statement details are corroborated in Postal Inspector Harry Holmes's testimony.

http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/holmes1.htm
............
Mr. HOLMES. I gave that information to my boss by telephone. He called Washington immediately. Of course this information included the money order number. This number was transmitted by phone to the chief inspector in Washington, who immediately got the money order center at Washington to begin a

295

---

search, which they use IBM equipment to kick out this money order, and about 7 o'clock Saturday night they did kick out the original money order and sent it over by, so they said, by special conveyance to the Secret Service, chief of Secret Service at Washington now, and it turned out, so they said, to be the correct money order. I asked them by phone as to what it said on it, and it said it had been issued to A. J. Hidell, which to me then was the tip that I had the correct money order. Up to then I didn't know whether I had the correct money order or not....

Let us see if one of the attorney reading here will vouch for your method of challenging the official record based on your own misgivings, prompting you to advise Len Osanic's listeners and reader here that Mr. Marks or Mr. Jackson "did not exist" and then when called on your unsupported claims, demanding that others "prove" what is in the record.

I did not think your response merited a reply, but then I considered your claim that Marks's testimony adds "further proof" despite all the facts already presented.

J. Harold Marks's testimony was dated Wednesday, March 30, 1960 :
https://bulk.resource.org/gao.gov/91-375/0000AA67.pdf


From November 10, 2015, http://jfk.education/node/11
I've proven Marks's testimony was obsolete as of 5 January, 1963, as it related to postal money orders sold in Dallas, but you resorted to Marks's 1960 testimony as supporting evidence of your claims, despite the facts I have repeatedly presented.:

[URL="https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=ssl&ei=_J14Vr3DBMyn-AX6l5PYCg#tbm=bks&q=%22*The+annual+payment+to+the+Federal+Reserve%2C+approximately+%24600%2C000+in+1961%2C+has+%22"]
Treasury-Post Office Departments and Executive Office ... - Page 144[/URL]
https://books.google.com/books?id=lRguAAAAMAAJ

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations - 1964 - ‎Snippet view - ‎More editions
...As the money orders issued on the new machines flow into the Federal Reserve System, Federal Reserve System, the Federal Reserve is no longer required to punch the amounts but can process them directly upon receipt. The annual payment to the Federal Reserve, approximately $600,000 in 1961, has now been eliminated.

I posted some of that proof on this forum as well, on Nov. 16, 2015.:

.....

https://books.google.com/books?id=SUbVAAAAMAAJ
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations - 1964 - ?Snippet view - ?page 143
Money Order Audit
Service Rendered
...........Print-punch order machines
In 1951 the use of a punched card money order was adopted and in 1955 the audit work was
centralized in Kansas City, Mo., for the entire country. Only the money order serial number was prepunched on the card. The amount was not punched until the money order reached the Federal Reserve System. A charge has always been made by the Federal Reserve for this keypunching work.

In fiscal 1961, the Department was given funds to buy money order issuing machines which could be used in all post offices and which would punch the amount into the order at the time of issuance. Deliveries of the equipment began late in the fiscal year 1962 and the machines were placed in operation in two regions. .....

.........

http://www.uspostalbulletins.com/PDF/Vol...20order%22
page 2

and page 5.: http://www.uspostalbulletins.com/PDF/Vol...20order%22
Jim DiEugenio posted recently about private conversations related to this new research.:
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....ntry319566
If David's comment about Marks's 1960 testimony supporting Armstrong's contention as related by Hargrove and defended by David Josephs that "the money order was not cashed" and David has as slim of a grasp of detail as he indicated in his last post, and I have compared in this post, what is the purpose of all of that telephone time? David Josephs indicates his suspicions must be disproven, but he tried to maneuver me into disproving them. The record is there, David, have at it, your ownself. In the meantime, unless Len Osanic has converted to an entertainment format, making a blanket statement to his listeners (on November 19) that Robert H Jackson could not be identified/located seems an unreasonable thing to claim.