FBI's Pants on Fire!

[David Josephs]

David,
You make it obvious you are in over your head or have a reading comprehension problem.

Mr. Scully - your inability to present your mountains of unrelated and poorly linked crap as corroborative or opposing evidence remains as poor as ever. You claim to be keeper of the truth behind the evidence yet your information always falls short of dealing with the situation being discussed. If Marks and Jackson were real people and the PMO involved was real... then Holmes' story about the PMO Stub in the book found at the Dallas GPO would either easily prove it and support it and be seen for the fabrication it was.

But there is no stub. No book of PMOs with numbers related to THAT PMO. Just the word of one Harry HOLMES - which is easily proven to be a story of fancy to convict Oswald and not grounded in any truth.

It seems you want so bad for the evidence against Ozzie to be real you'll post most anything to confuse the issue. ::thumbsup::

Let's look at some of your contentions...

Since the SS report from DC mentions Jackson by name, he must be real and must have been involved in the recovery of said PMO - cause the SS like the FBI had no special interest in providing evidence focused solely on Oswald - I don't know if you're just plain dim or naive Tom. The SS and USPS are key members of the "Ozzie at all costs" brigade with the FBI gathering and coordinating all this BS evidence as they did in most every area of the case.

It is no surprise you accept FBI/SS WC summary reports as FACT. They are unsigned and generally unseen by those described within the report and are taken as the tablet from the mountain until on elooks at the crap these two agencies offer.

You accept Harry Holmes' explanation as factual as well - the joke remains on you. Did you read his statements in the notes he wrote about the events? Do you have any sense for the depth of the lies involved in what he offers?
Are you claiming that Holmes found the PMO via the Field and Stream mag for $12.78 plus a little extra plus shipping and just got lucky. The papers all said $12.78 based on this bogus story. Yet you believe him.

Whether PMOs were sent to Siberia deosn't change what the SS Chicago field office wrote in their report which conflicts with what the DC SS writes in theirs.

Here are those stupid Postal Inspectors working side by side with the Secret Service to find the PMO in Kansas City... How again can KROZ learn they found the PMO at 8pm CST, 9pm EST when the boys involved in that search have yet to find it and bring it to SA PARKER. Hmmm?



You want to claim that the SS Chicago office report is wrong despite numerous USPS empoyees involved in the search and completely unaware of this change in storage location.








Now sadly I covered up some important info in this document - what the FBI told the USPS/SS after acquiring the records from Kleins -
Why Tom if the FBI et al knew it was a $21.95 PMO would they be claiming the rifle cost $12.78 for weeks. The Field and Stream issue HOLMES finds the $12.78 within becomes THE GUN AD he used until they Kleins story comes together. Seems there is always an FBI FIRST STORY which is found to be impossible, summarily dropped and replaced by something just as transparent.





Now Tom, why would the FBI send the SS/USPS on a wild goose chase if the stub for the PMO was found that morning and/or that they have an Order Blank for $21.45?
How does HOLMES take a $12.78 ad and come up with a $21.45 PMO stub which for some reason is not in evidence, nor is a statement from the person who found it. The memory of HOLMES is amazing as long as it does not involve the names of key participants, witnesses or superiors.

So you see Tom... All your posting of grave locations and family trees does not address the problems you like to ignore - that the evidence is not Authentic. While I appreciate what Drew says - the fact this is not a trial makes the authentication of evidence even MORE important. If it cannot even pass the test here, it would never be admitted as evidence in a case against Oswald. If it's not authentic Tom, then all the accusations related to that piece of evidence are moot.

You have no explanation regarding who "Marks" originally had begin the search after DUGGINS calls him an hour before VERANT so that the SS reporting agent can tell us that
"they" were having trouble bringing the computers up...Why again are they messing with computers at the Center at 8:30pm when our man Holmes was involved in finding the PMO early that morning?

Neither Marks nor Jackson were called to testify or offer a written statement to corroborate the Secret Service's story. We simply are asked to believe them.

Well Tom, I can't do that given the mountain of lies the FBI/SS/USPS/IN&S/CIA offered up as convicting evidence. Their evidence moreso than anything else needs authentication - the process whereby the evidence can be accepted as REAL in a court of law.

Thanks again for your obtuse findings and tangential explanations without actually saying anything. I'd prefer you completely ignore everything I post given you POV on the subject and such a willingness to believe what you are fed.

Peace out Tom... when you finally see how the Evidence IS the Conspiracy maybe you'll finally stop trying to defend the completely fraudulent.