22-12-2015, 08:29 PM
David,
I have one contention to make. aside from that, I can demonstrate that there are inaccurate, unsubstantiated, and misleading claims and descriptions about the $21.45 money order displayed on the pages that resolve at these two links, and that they are on a website maintained by Jim Hargrove.
I have one contention to make. aside from that, I can demonstrate that there are inaccurate, unsubstantiated, and misleading claims and descriptions about the $21.45 money order displayed on the pages that resolve at these two links, and that they are on a website maintained by Jim Hargrove.
Quote:http://harveyandlee.net….Oswald Never Purchased a Mail Order Rifle
The Postal Money Order allegedly used to purchase the rifle that supposedly killed JFK is perhaps the most unexplainable document published by the Warren Commission. A quick look at this money order (see DOCUMENT link below) shows that it was never deposited nor cashed at a bank. It does not have a single bank stamp on the front or reverse side…
http://harveyandlee.net/Guns/Guns.html
FABRICATING A HOAX
MAIL ORDER RIFLE.
…In other words, this money order could easily have been pulled from a stack of fresh, unsold money orders by a postal official in Dallas, sometime after the assassination, and then given to the FBI….
Note: The text above is presented as prompts to locate the entire
description of the money order, as presented on the two web pages,
and are not intended to highlight specific conflicts with recently presented, related evidence. It is, of course, left to Mr. Hargrove to decide what he wished to present on web pages under his administration. I took issue with him not making any revision for
the purpose of presenting timely and informed details about the money
order to readers of these two web pages. Speaking only for myself,
knowing what I have learned since November 9, 2015, an update
of the present description of money order controversy would have
been a top priority. On my own site, I presented the newly discovered
money order background details, nearly in real time.
You posted that J Harold Marks's 1960 testimony supports that postal money orders were keypunched by the Federal Reserve.
You posted that Marks and Jackson are fictitious names.
My contention is that I have made no false, unsubstantiated or misleading claims. You have many suspicions. I've presented research details that put a number of them to rest. Please recall that I got into this about November 9, in reaction to Jean Davison backing the claim of Brian Castle, a claim you repeated yesterday, that the Federal Reserve keypunched holes in postal money orders.
I posted proof that this was an obsolete claim, as of 5 January, 1963, for all postal money orders sold in the Dallas postal region, on or after that date. From there, by extension I found there was an explanation for the jump in money order serial numbers sold in the Dallas postal region between 5 January, when Oswald purchased serial# 2,202,000,060, and the serial # of the $21.45 sold on 12 March. I also found that it was understandable and reasonable for there to be such confusion on where the paid money order could be found on November, 23, 1963, as there was a transition, beginning with the publicized new process money order announced in spring, 1962, compared to the older money order that the Federal Reserve was still key punching round holes into in 1963. What you maintain
are justifications for your deep suspicions are, upon my own recent thorough examination, routine effects/confusion resulting from a coincidental technological upgrade coordinated by the Post Office and the US Treasurer's ADP accomadation of postal money orders and 59,000 newly distributed print-punch postal money order machines issued in exactly in the period of time under study today.
You have overreacted, owing to awareness of too little detail.
http://jfk.education/node/11
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7871&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=7871&stc=1)
Peter Janney's uncle was Frank Pace, chairman of General Dynamics who enlisted law partners Roswell Gilpatric and Luce's brother-in-law, Maurice "Tex" Moore, in a trade of 16 percent of Gen. Dyn. stock in exchange for Henry Crown and his Material Service Corp. of Chicago, headed by Byfield's Sherman Hotel group's Pat Hoy. The Crown family and partner Conrad Hilton next benefitted from TFX, at the time, the most costly military contract award in the history of the world. Obama was sponsored by the Crowns and Pritzkers. So was Albert Jenner Peter Janney has preferred to write of an imaginary CIA assassination of his surrogate mother, Mary Meyer, but not a word about his Uncle Frank.