01-02-2016, 05:29 AM
You're in good company, as no other journalist, or researcher of any stature seems to want to touch it either. (Fools rush in, etc...)
I just ordered your collection The Assassinations from an Amazon 3rd party because I was so impressed by the prescience of what was on the web of "The Posthumous Assassination of JFK." I hope, in the longer article you tie it in with the similarly timed respective push from the left that you mention. Like Hersh's, Cockburn and Chomsky's (even alas IF Stone's) record on JFK is abysmal and incomprehensible. It always made sense to me, as was implied by Salandria, I think, why Chomsky would make a political decision to concentrate on the War and avoid a quagmire or even third rail by delving to JFK's murder. But why go out of your way to denigrate the man's legacy?
I just ordered your collection The Assassinations from an Amazon 3rd party because I was so impressed by the prescience of what was on the web of "The Posthumous Assassination of JFK." I hope, in the longer article you tie it in with the similarly timed respective push from the left that you mention. Like Hersh's, Cockburn and Chomsky's (even alas IF Stone's) record on JFK is abysmal and incomprehensible. It always made sense to me, as was implied by Salandria, I think, why Chomsky would make a political decision to concentrate on the War and avoid a quagmire or even third rail by delving to JFK's murder. But why go out of your way to denigrate the man's legacy?