01-02-2016, 11:49 AM
Quote:no other journalist, or researcher of any stature seems to want to touch it either.
Joan Mellen, John Newman, Jim Marrs, Peter Dale Scott, James Douglass, Walt Brown and Dick Russell have all either written books or lectured on the subject of 9/11, and argued that they disbelieve the official story. (Newman's easy to miss lecture was at a Cynthia McKinney conference in 2005). They're all JFK researchers of varying degrees of stature. Doug Horne featured a page in his final INSIDE THE AARB volume arguing that most serious JFK researchers agree with the official 9/11 story, but counting through the above suggests the opposite. I'm sure if I scanned the interview summaries at Black Op Radio I could find a few more.
Counting journalists, former GUARDIAN journalist Nafeez Ahmed wrote an entire book on 9/11, THE WAR ON TRUTH, and that book received a big back-cover blurb of praise from John Pilger. Author Mark Crispin Miller has also been outspoken about the subject.
As for James DiEugenio's comments here - and I respect and sympathize with his reasons - there are a good number of 9/11 researchers still doing solid work on a regular basis - Kevin Ryan, the guy that runs the Shoestring 9/11 blog, a few others. And yet I can count the number of really good and reliable JFK sites on probably one hand, and I can count the number of people doing really long, detailed reviews of new JFK books on one hand and still have most of my fingers left over. If Jim decided to dump his JFK work and start blogging about WTC7 we'd lose probably the one guy with his finger in the dyke holding back the ongoing tsunami of crap from flooding the JFK research community and drowning us all.