02-02-2016, 02:21 AM
Ruppert's book is still worthwhile, even if you discount the Peak Oil thing.
The whole back and forth about WTC7 and the melting point of steel and free-fall speed and so on is a great way to bury the conversation in excessive technical details. I agree with Gage and his fellow engineers but I've seen vociferous reviewers on Amazon lambast recent 9/11 books because the volume in question didn't discuss the buildings, freefall, nanothermite, etc etc etc. In one case I responded with a link to the author's earlier book, also on 9/11, which was published by Trine Day, which did have a big chapter on the demolition issue, and which has a screenshot of glowing WTC molten steel on the back cover. Not good enough - the author (said the Amazon reviewer) was clearly disinfo and the book was not to be trusted. There's probably about 50 other issues and facts that could be used to attack the official 9/11 story, but controlled demolition (which I agree with btw) has become the big one, blocking out a lot of the rest of the debate. No wonder Fetzer likes dragging space lasers into the discussion.
The whole back and forth about WTC7 and the melting point of steel and free-fall speed and so on is a great way to bury the conversation in excessive technical details. I agree with Gage and his fellow engineers but I've seen vociferous reviewers on Amazon lambast recent 9/11 books because the volume in question didn't discuss the buildings, freefall, nanothermite, etc etc etc. In one case I responded with a link to the author's earlier book, also on 9/11, which was published by Trine Day, which did have a big chapter on the demolition issue, and which has a screenshot of glowing WTC molten steel on the back cover. Not good enough - the author (said the Amazon reviewer) was clearly disinfo and the book was not to be trusted. There's probably about 50 other issues and facts that could be used to attack the official 9/11 story, but controlled demolition (which I agree with btw) has become the big one, blocking out a lot of the rest of the debate. No wonder Fetzer likes dragging space lasers into the discussion.